Outcome Measures in Evaluation of Weighted Blankets: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Occupational Therapy International Pub Date : 2025-02-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/oti/3663534
Maria Lönn, Ellen Odéus
{"title":"Outcome Measures in Evaluation of Weighted Blankets: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Maria Lönn, Ellen Odéus","doi":"10.1155/oti/3663534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Weighted blankets are an intervention used in healthcare settings for alleviating anxiety and sleep problems. Selection of appropriate outcome measures that capture relevant effects is important in clinical practice and research. However, outcomes used are diverse and not standardised. Therefore, this scoping review is aimed at identifying, synthesising, and describing available research and used outcome measures in research studies evaluating weighted blankets. <b>Methods:</b> A scoping review was conducted, with a search of four databases. The search included studies published until February 2024. Results were categorized according to target population (adult or child) and primary outcome (sleep or anxiety). A conceptual map was developed to describe outcome measures used in the field. <b>Results:</b> A total of 38 studies were identified, including 12 randomised controlled trials, 13 pre-post-studies, 6 case studies, 3 register studies, and 3 qualitative studies. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Anxiety Visual Analogue Scale were commonly used outcome measurements in evaluation of weighted blanket effects on anxiety and most commonly conducted in an adult population. There was considerable heterogeneity in the outcomes used, particularly within the domain of sleep. In studies evaluating weighted blankets as a sleep intervention for children, objective measurement methods such as actigraphy were common, as was the use of a sleep diary. <b>Conclusion:</b> Even though there is extensive research available evaluating weighted blanket use and effects, there is a lack of standardised outcome measures and instruments are not adapted to use within occupational therapy practice. More research is necessary, informing clinical practice about which measures to use and when. Furthermore, there is a need to develop an instrument specifically tailored for use within occupational therapy practice to evaluate sleep interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49140,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Therapy International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"3663534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Therapy International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/oti/3663534","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Weighted blankets are an intervention used in healthcare settings for alleviating anxiety and sleep problems. Selection of appropriate outcome measures that capture relevant effects is important in clinical practice and research. However, outcomes used are diverse and not standardised. Therefore, this scoping review is aimed at identifying, synthesising, and describing available research and used outcome measures in research studies evaluating weighted blankets. Methods: A scoping review was conducted, with a search of four databases. The search included studies published until February 2024. Results were categorized according to target population (adult or child) and primary outcome (sleep or anxiety). A conceptual map was developed to describe outcome measures used in the field. Results: A total of 38 studies were identified, including 12 randomised controlled trials, 13 pre-post-studies, 6 case studies, 3 register studies, and 3 qualitative studies. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Anxiety Visual Analogue Scale were commonly used outcome measurements in evaluation of weighted blanket effects on anxiety and most commonly conducted in an adult population. There was considerable heterogeneity in the outcomes used, particularly within the domain of sleep. In studies evaluating weighted blankets as a sleep intervention for children, objective measurement methods such as actigraphy were common, as was the use of a sleep diary. Conclusion: Even though there is extensive research available evaluating weighted blanket use and effects, there is a lack of standardised outcome measures and instruments are not adapted to use within occupational therapy practice. More research is necessary, informing clinical practice about which measures to use and when. Furthermore, there is a need to develop an instrument specifically tailored for use within occupational therapy practice to evaluate sleep interventions.

评价加权毛毯的结果指标:一项范围综述。
简介:加重毛毯是一种在医疗环境中用于缓解焦虑和睡眠问题的干预措施。在临床实践和研究中,选择能够捕捉相关效果的适当结果测量方法是很重要的。然而,使用的结果是多样化的,没有标准化。因此,本综述旨在识别、综合和描述评估加权毛毯的现有研究和使用的研究结果指标。方法:进行范围综述,检索四个数据库。这项研究包括了2024年2月之前发表的研究。结果根据目标人群(成人或儿童)和主要结局(睡眠或焦虑)进行分类。制定了一份概念性地图,以描述在实地使用的结果措施。结果:共纳入38项研究,包括12项随机对照试验、13项前后研究、6项病例研究、3项登记研究和3项定性研究。状态-特质焦虑量表和焦虑视觉模拟量表是评估加权毯子效应对焦虑的常用结果测量方法,最常在成人人群中进行。使用的结果存在相当大的异质性,特别是在睡眠领域。在评估加重毛毯作为儿童睡眠干预措施的研究中,活动记录仪等客观测量方法很常见,睡眠日记的使用也很常见。结论:尽管有广泛的研究评估加权毯的使用和效果,但缺乏标准化的结果测量和工具,不适合在职业治疗实践中使用。有必要进行更多的研究,告知临床实践应该使用哪些措施以及何时使用。此外,有必要开发一种专门用于职业治疗实践的工具来评估睡眠干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Occupational Therapy International is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing manuscripts that reflect the practice of occupational therapy throughout the world. Research studies or original concept papers are considered for publication. Priority for publication will be given to research studies that provide recommendations for evidence-based practice and demonstrate the effectiveness of a specific treatment method. Single subject case studies evaluating treatment effectiveness are also encouraged. Other topics that are appropriate for the journal include reliability and validity of clinical instruments, assistive technology, community rehabilitation, cultural comparisons, health promotion and wellness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信