Intersectional Stigma and Occupational Engagement Among Racialized Higher Education Students: A Qualitative Study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Nikhil Tomar, Ryan Gibson, Kathryne Brewer, Nicholas Mian
{"title":"Intersectional Stigma and Occupational Engagement Among Racialized Higher Education Students: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Nikhil Tomar, Ryan Gibson, Kathryne Brewer, Nicholas Mian","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2025.050984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Intersectional stigma of mental illness and race/ethnicity is a persistent determinant of the growing mental health care disparities among students in the United States. It is also the foundation on which concerns of inclusion and belonging are experienced, warranting scholarship on intersectional stigma and occupational engagement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine intersectional stigma and its relationship with occupational engagement among racialized higher education students.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study used a qualitative descriptive design with interview methodology, and thematic analysis was used for data analysis. Transcript checks, peer debriefings, and multiple analysts helped strengthen the rigor of the study. Theoretical frameworks included the principle of gradient rationality to examine stigma and the moral economics of occupations framework to examine occupational engagement.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Higher education institution. Participants Thirteen racialized students with mental illness were recruited via purposive sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes emerged: identities and their negotiations, mental health journey, intersectional stigma of mental illness and race/ethnicity, and occupational engagement (mental health care and community participation).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Findings highlight that intersectional stigma and racial/ethnic identity construction are fluid processes instead of fixed attributes and guide occupational engagement. Future research will help occupational therapy practitioners and leaders in efforts to address the growing public mental health crisis. Plain-Language Summary: This study highlights that concerns related to belonging and inclusion among racialized students with mental illness are experienced through the intersectional stigma of mental illness and race/ethnicity. Understanding intersectional stigma also allows practitioners and scholars to better inform and implement culturally sensitive care within mental health care settings. Positionality Statement: This research was conducted by a team of interdisciplinary multiracial researchers. This research was initiated by Nikhil Tomar, an immigrant scholar of color with a professional background in occupational therapy. The team included researchers from clinical psychology, social work, and sociology. The team included a Black scholar with expertise in race/ethnic identity, a Biracial scholar with expertise in stigma and global mental health, and a White scholar with expertise in children and adolescent mental health. The interdisciplinary nature of this research allowed the authors to challenge conventional wisdom in their respective fields and conduct research in a critical manner. Tomar has expertise in interview methodology and mental health research, which helped him conduct interviews by balancing the needs for participant safety and data collection.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"79 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.050984","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Intersectional stigma of mental illness and race/ethnicity is a persistent determinant of the growing mental health care disparities among students in the United States. It is also the foundation on which concerns of inclusion and belonging are experienced, warranting scholarship on intersectional stigma and occupational engagement.

Objective: To examine intersectional stigma and its relationship with occupational engagement among racialized higher education students.

Design: This study used a qualitative descriptive design with interview methodology, and thematic analysis was used for data analysis. Transcript checks, peer debriefings, and multiple analysts helped strengthen the rigor of the study. Theoretical frameworks included the principle of gradient rationality to examine stigma and the moral economics of occupations framework to examine occupational engagement.

Setting: Higher education institution. Participants Thirteen racialized students with mental illness were recruited via purposive sampling.

Results: Four themes emerged: identities and their negotiations, mental health journey, intersectional stigma of mental illness and race/ethnicity, and occupational engagement (mental health care and community participation).

Conclusions and relevance: Findings highlight that intersectional stigma and racial/ethnic identity construction are fluid processes instead of fixed attributes and guide occupational engagement. Future research will help occupational therapy practitioners and leaders in efforts to address the growing public mental health crisis. Plain-Language Summary: This study highlights that concerns related to belonging and inclusion among racialized students with mental illness are experienced through the intersectional stigma of mental illness and race/ethnicity. Understanding intersectional stigma also allows practitioners and scholars to better inform and implement culturally sensitive care within mental health care settings. Positionality Statement: This research was conducted by a team of interdisciplinary multiracial researchers. This research was initiated by Nikhil Tomar, an immigrant scholar of color with a professional background in occupational therapy. The team included researchers from clinical psychology, social work, and sociology. The team included a Black scholar with expertise in race/ethnic identity, a Biracial scholar with expertise in stigma and global mental health, and a White scholar with expertise in children and adolescent mental health. The interdisciplinary nature of this research allowed the authors to challenge conventional wisdom in their respective fields and conduct research in a critical manner. Tomar has expertise in interview methodology and mental health research, which helped him conduct interviews by balancing the needs for participant safety and data collection.

种族化高等教育学生的交叉污名与职业投入:一项质性研究。
重要性:精神疾病和种族/民族的交叉耻辱是美国学生心理保健差距日益扩大的持久决定因素。它也是包容和归属感问题的基础,保证了交叉污名和职业参与的学术研究。目的:探讨种族化高等教育学生的交叉污名及其与职业投入的关系。设计:本研究采用访谈法定性描述设计,数据分析采用专题分析。记录检查、同行汇报和多位分析师帮助加强了研究的严谨性。理论框架包括检验耻感的梯度理性原则和检验职业投入的职业道德经济学框架。单位:高等教育机构。采用有目的抽样的方法,招募了13名种族化的精神疾病学生。结果:出现了四个主题:身份及其谈判,心理健康之旅,精神疾病和种族/民族的交叉耻辱,以及职业参与(精神卫生保健和社区参与)。结论和相关性:研究结果强调,交叉污名和种族/民族身份建构是流动的过程,而不是固定的属性,并指导职业参与。未来的研究将有助于职业治疗从业者和领导者努力解决日益严重的公共心理健康危机。摘要:本研究强调了精神疾病的种族化学生在归属感和包容性方面的担忧是通过精神疾病和种族/民族的交叉耻辱来经历的。了解交叉病耻感也使从业者和学者能够更好地告知和实施精神卫生保健环境中的文化敏感护理。立场声明:这项研究是由一组跨学科的多种族研究人员进行的。这项研究是由Nikhil Tomar发起的,他是一位具有职业治疗专业背景的有色人种移民学者。该团队包括来自临床心理学、社会工作和社会学的研究人员。该团队包括一位在种族/民族身份方面具有专长的黑人学者,一位在耻辱和全球心理健康方面具有专长的混血儿学者,以及一位在儿童和青少年心理健康方面具有专长的白人学者。本研究的跨学科性质使作者能够挑战各自领域的传统智慧,并以批判性的方式进行研究。Tomar在访谈方法学和心理健康研究方面具有专业知识,这有助于他通过平衡参与者安全和数据收集的需求来进行访谈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信