The effect of peer group management intervention on chronic pain intensity, number of areas of pain, and pain self-efficacy.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2024-0018
Marjatta Inkeri Reilimo, Markku Sainio, Juha Liira, Marjukka Laurola
{"title":"The effect of peer group management intervention on chronic pain intensity, number of areas of pain, and pain self-efficacy.","authors":"Marjatta Inkeri Reilimo, Markku Sainio, Juha Liira, Marjukka Laurola","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2024-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Chronic pain causes loss of workability, and pharmacological treatment is often not sufficient, whereas psychosocial treatments may relieve continual pain. This study aimed to investigate the effect of peer group management intervention among patients with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants were 18-65-year-old employees of the Municipality of Helsinki (women 83%) who visited an occupational health care physician, nurse, psychologist, or physiotherapist for chronic pain lasting at least 3 months. An additional inclusion criterion was an elevated risk of work disability. Our study was a stepped wedge cluster, randomized controlled trial, and group interventions used mindfulness, relaxation, cognitive behavioral therapy, and acceptance and commitment therapy. We randomized sixty participants to either a pain management group intervention or to a waiting list with the same intervention 5 months later. After dropouts, 48 employees participated in 6 weekly group meetings. We followed up participants from groups A, B, and C for 12 months and groups D, E, and F for 6 months. As outcome measures, we used the pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, the number of areas of pain, the visual analog scale of pain, and the pain self-efficacy. We adjusted the results before and after the intervention for panel data, clustering effect, and time interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The peer group intervention decreased the number of areas of pain by 40%, from 5.96 (1-10) to 3.58 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and increased the pain self-efficacy by 15%, from 30.4 to 37.5 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Pain intensity decreased slightly, but not statistically significantly, from 7.1 to 6.8.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Peer group intervention for 6 weeks among municipal employees with chronic pain is partially effective. The number of areas of pain and pain self-efficacy were more sensitive indicators of change than the pain intensity. Any primary care unit with sufficient resources may implement the intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2024-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic pain causes loss of workability, and pharmacological treatment is often not sufficient, whereas psychosocial treatments may relieve continual pain. This study aimed to investigate the effect of peer group management intervention among patients with chronic pain.

Methods: The participants were 18-65-year-old employees of the Municipality of Helsinki (women 83%) who visited an occupational health care physician, nurse, psychologist, or physiotherapist for chronic pain lasting at least 3 months. An additional inclusion criterion was an elevated risk of work disability. Our study was a stepped wedge cluster, randomized controlled trial, and group interventions used mindfulness, relaxation, cognitive behavioral therapy, and acceptance and commitment therapy. We randomized sixty participants to either a pain management group intervention or to a waiting list with the same intervention 5 months later. After dropouts, 48 employees participated in 6 weekly group meetings. We followed up participants from groups A, B, and C for 12 months and groups D, E, and F for 6 months. As outcome measures, we used the pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, the number of areas of pain, the visual analog scale of pain, and the pain self-efficacy. We adjusted the results before and after the intervention for panel data, clustering effect, and time interval.

Results: The peer group intervention decreased the number of areas of pain by 40%, from 5.96 (1-10) to 3.58 (p < 0.001), and increased the pain self-efficacy by 15%, from 30.4 to 37.5 (p < 0.001). Pain intensity decreased slightly, but not statistically significantly, from 7.1 to 6.8.

Conclusions: Peer group intervention for 6 weeks among municipal employees with chronic pain is partially effective. The number of areas of pain and pain self-efficacy were more sensitive indicators of change than the pain intensity. Any primary care unit with sufficient resources may implement the intervention.

同伴群体管理干预对慢性疼痛强度、疼痛区数和疼痛自我效能的影响。
目的:慢性疼痛导致工作能力丧失,药物治疗往往是不够的,而社会心理治疗可以缓解持续的疼痛。本研究旨在探讨同伴团体管理干预对慢性疼痛患者的影响。方法:参与者是赫尔辛基市18-65岁的雇员(女性83%),她们因慢性疼痛持续至少3个月而就诊过职业卫生保健医师、护士、心理学家或物理治疗师。另一项纳入标准是工作残疾风险升高。本研究采用阶梯楔形聚类,随机对照试验,采用正念、放松、认知行为疗法和接受与承诺疗法。我们将60名参与者随机分为疼痛管理组干预组和等待5个月后同样干预组。在退出后,48名员工参加了每周6次的小组会议。A、B、C组随访12个月,D、E、F组随访6个月。作为结果测量,我们使用疼痛自我效能问卷、疼痛区域数、疼痛视觉模拟量表和疼痛自我效能。我们根据面板数据、聚类效应和时间间隔对干预前后的结果进行了调整。结果:同伴组干预使疼痛区数从5.96(1-10)减少到3.58,减少了40% (p < 0.001);使疼痛自我效能感从30.4提高到37.5,提高了15% (p < 0.001)。疼痛强度从7.1降至6.8,略有下降,但无统计学意义。结论:对市政工作人员慢性疼痛患者进行为期6周的同伴团体干预是部分有效的。疼痛区域数和疼痛自我效能感是比疼痛强度更敏感的变化指标。任何有足够资源的初级保健单位都可以实施干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信