Clinical comparative study of the modified superior mesenteric artery approach in total laparoscopic radical resection for right colon cancer - a single-center retrospective study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Lishuai Xu, Jiawei Wang, Yue Peng, Chengwei Wu, Song Wang, Xu Zhang, Changming Liang, Senlin Wan, Cheng Yang, Qingsheng Fu, Yabin Xia, Xiaoxu Huang, Li Xu
{"title":"Clinical comparative study of the modified superior mesenteric artery approach in total laparoscopic radical resection for right colon cancer - a single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Lishuai Xu, Jiawei Wang, Yue Peng, Chengwei Wu, Song Wang, Xu Zhang, Changming Liang, Senlin Wan, Cheng Yang, Qingsheng Fu, Yabin Xia, Xiaoxu Huang, Li Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12957-025-03725-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the safety and feasibility of the modified approach for accessing the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in total laparoscopic radical resection for right colon cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included 107 patients who underwent total laparoscopic radical resection of right colon cancer at The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College between August 2022 and December 2023. 53 patients were in the modified SMA approach (modified group) and 54 patients were in the traditional SMA approach (control group). The control group and modified group underwent total laparoscopic radical resection of right colon cancer, and the following baseline and pathological characteristics of the two groups were compared: intraoperative condition, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications. Our modified surgical method was to isolate the mesocolon using a cranial(the ligament of Treitz) -to- caudal(the pedicle of ileocolic) pathway and the orderly ligation of blood vessels in the SMA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline characteristics or pathological data between the two groups. Compared with the traditional SMA approach, the modified SMA approach had a shorter surgical time(P < 0.001) and vascular dissection time (P < 0.001) and less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.000). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of total harvested lymph nodes or positive harvested lymph nodes between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05); There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative hospital stay, time to first flatus, time to pull out drainage tube and drainage between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified SMA approach in totally laparoscopic radical resection for right colon cancer can shorten the surgical and vascular dissection time, reduce intraoperative bleeding and reduce the surgical difficulty and intraoperative risk of the SMA approach for right colon cancer. In clinical practice, its safety and feasibility are relatively high, and it is worth promoting.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College and registered with the China Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2300075919, Date of Registration:2023-09-19- retrospective registration) http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx .</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03725-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To explore the safety and feasibility of the modified approach for accessing the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in total laparoscopic radical resection for right colon cancer.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 107 patients who underwent total laparoscopic radical resection of right colon cancer at The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College between August 2022 and December 2023. 53 patients were in the modified SMA approach (modified group) and 54 patients were in the traditional SMA approach (control group). The control group and modified group underwent total laparoscopic radical resection of right colon cancer, and the following baseline and pathological characteristics of the two groups were compared: intraoperative condition, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications. Our modified surgical method was to isolate the mesocolon using a cranial(the ligament of Treitz) -to- caudal(the pedicle of ileocolic) pathway and the orderly ligation of blood vessels in the SMA.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline characteristics or pathological data between the two groups. Compared with the traditional SMA approach, the modified SMA approach had a shorter surgical time(P < 0.001) and vascular dissection time (P < 0.001) and less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.000). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of total harvested lymph nodes or positive harvested lymph nodes between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05); There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative hospital stay, time to first flatus, time to pull out drainage tube and drainage between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The modified SMA approach in totally laparoscopic radical resection for right colon cancer can shorten the surgical and vascular dissection time, reduce intraoperative bleeding and reduce the surgical difficulty and intraoperative risk of the SMA approach for right colon cancer. In clinical practice, its safety and feasibility are relatively high, and it is worth promoting.

Trial registration: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College and registered with the China Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2300075919, Date of Registration:2023-09-19- retrospective registration) http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx .

背景:探讨在右侧结肠癌全腹腔镜根治性切除术中采用改良方法进入肠系膜上动脉(SMA)的安全性和可行性:目的:探讨右侧结肠癌全腹腔镜根治性切除术中肠系膜上动脉(SMA)进入改良方法的安全性和可行性:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2022年8月至2023年12月期间在皖南医学院第一附属医院接受全腹腔镜右结肠癌根治性切除术的107例患者。53例患者采用改良SMA方法(改良组),54例患者采用传统SMA方法(对照组)。对照组和改良组患者均接受了全腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治性切除术,并比较了两组患者的术中情况、术后恢复情况和术后并发症等基线和病理特征。我们改良的手术方法是通过头端(Treitz韧带)-尾端(回肠结肠梗)路径分离结肠系膜,并有序结扎SMA血管:结果:两组患者的基线特征和病理数据差异无统计学意义。与传统的SMA方法相比,改良SMA方法的手术时间更短(P 0.05);两组患者的术后住院时间、首次排气时间、拔出引流管时间和引流量差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),两组患者的并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05):结论:改良SMA入路在全腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治性切除术中的应用,可缩短手术和血管解剖时间,减少术中出血,降低SMA入路治疗右半结肠癌的手术难度和术中风险。在临床实践中,其安全性和可行性较高,值得推广:本研究经皖南医学院第一附属医院伦理委员会批准,并在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2300075919,注册日期:2023-09-19-回顾性注册)http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信