Epidemiological monitoring of sewage sludge and wastewater from an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor using SARS-CoV-2 as a model.

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Water Science and Technology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.2166/wst.2025.014
João Pedro Stepan Wagner, Maria Fernanda Rech, Bruno Aschidamini Prandi, Ana Cláudia Franco, Caroline Rigotto, Fabiana Horn
{"title":"Epidemiological monitoring of sewage sludge and wastewater from an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor using SARS-CoV-2 as a model.","authors":"João Pedro Stepan Wagner, Maria Fernanda Rech, Bruno Aschidamini Prandi, Ana Cláudia Franco, Caroline Rigotto, Fabiana Horn","doi":"10.2166/wst.2025.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the potential of sludge-based monitoring from an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor for epidemiological surveillance, using SARS-CoV-2 as a model. We monitored SARS-CoV-2 copy numbers and mutations, and compared concentrations in sludge to concentrations in wastewater samples taken on the same days. From January to August 2021, 32 sludge samples were analyzed; 30 (93%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2, and copy numbers varied from 0.147 to 2.314 copies ×10<sup>6</sup>/L. In wastewater samples collected on the same days, 31 (96%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2, and copy numbers ranged from 0.058 to 3.014 copies ×10<sup>6</sup>/L. The concentration of SARS-CoV-2 in the sludge rose along with confirmed hospitalization cases in March, while wastewater SARS-CoV-2 concentrations rose 2 weeks earlier along with numbers of new confirmed cases. Mutations of variants of concern, Gamma and Delta, were identified in sludge samples in the same months that they became dominant in the corresponding regions. Our results indicate that, although monitoring of sewage sludge was not effective in anticipating infection numbers, it is a promising way to gain insight into the epidemiological situation in a city or region.</p>","PeriodicalId":23653,"journal":{"name":"Water Science and Technology","volume":"91 4","pages":"333-343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2025.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the potential of sludge-based monitoring from an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor for epidemiological surveillance, using SARS-CoV-2 as a model. We monitored SARS-CoV-2 copy numbers and mutations, and compared concentrations in sludge to concentrations in wastewater samples taken on the same days. From January to August 2021, 32 sludge samples were analyzed; 30 (93%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2, and copy numbers varied from 0.147 to 2.314 copies ×106/L. In wastewater samples collected on the same days, 31 (96%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2, and copy numbers ranged from 0.058 to 3.014 copies ×106/L. The concentration of SARS-CoV-2 in the sludge rose along with confirmed hospitalization cases in March, while wastewater SARS-CoV-2 concentrations rose 2 weeks earlier along with numbers of new confirmed cases. Mutations of variants of concern, Gamma and Delta, were identified in sludge samples in the same months that they became dominant in the corresponding regions. Our results indicate that, although monitoring of sewage sludge was not effective in anticipating infection numbers, it is a promising way to gain insight into the epidemiological situation in a city or region.

以 SARS-CoV-2 为模型,对来自上流式厌氧污泥毯反应器的污水污泥和废水进行流行病学监测。
本研究以SARS-CoV-2为模型,探讨了上流式厌氧污泥毯式反应器中基于污泥的监测在流行病学监测中的潜力。我们监测了SARS-CoV-2的拷贝数和突变,并将污泥中的浓度与同一天采集的废水样本中的浓度进行了比较。2021年1 - 8月,对32份污泥样本进行分析;30例(93%)SARS-CoV-2阳性,拷贝数为0.147 ~ 2.314 copies ×106/L。同日采集的废水样品中,31份(96%)呈SARS-CoV-2阳性,拷贝数为0.058 ~ 3.014 copies ×106/L。3月份,污泥中SARS-CoV-2的浓度随着确诊住院病例的增加而上升,而两周前,废水中SARS-CoV-2的浓度随着新确诊病例的增加而上升。在污泥样本中发现了Gamma和Delta变体的突变,这些变体在相应区域成为优势的相同月份。我们的研究结果表明,虽然污泥监测不能有效预测感染人数,但它是一种有希望了解城市或地区流行病学情况的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Science and Technology
Water Science and Technology 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
366
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: Water Science and Technology publishes peer-reviewed papers on all aspects of the science and technology of water and wastewater. Papers are selected by a rigorous peer review procedure with the aim of rapid and wide dissemination of research results, development and application of new techniques, and related managerial and policy issues. Scientists, engineers, consultants, managers and policy-makers will find this journal essential as a permanent record of progress of research activities and their practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信