Patrick T Davies, Vanessa T Cao, Marissa V Hendrickson, Morgan J Thompson
{"title":"Lessons learned from witnessing constructive interparental conflict and the beneficial implications for children.","authors":"Patrick T Davies, Vanessa T Cao, Marissa V Hendrickson, Morgan J Thompson","doi":"10.1037/dev0001952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined children's emotion situation knowledge and social problem-solving abilities as mediators in the prospective link between constructive interparental conflict (IPC) and children's psychological adjustment in a sample of 238 preschool children (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 4.38 years; 52% female children; 28% Black; 14% multiracial or other race; 16% Latinx) and their mothers. The methodological approach consisted of multiple methods and informants in a longitudinal design with three annual measurement occasions (i.e., preschool, kindergarten, first grade). Results of the path analysis indicated that Wave 1 constructive IPC predicted residualized increases in children's emotion situation knowledge and social problem solving at Wave 2 with the inclusion of hostile IPC, demographic factors, and prior child characteristics (i.e., child age, race, internalizing and externalizing symptoms, social competence) as simultaneous predictors. In turn, children's emotion situation knowledge at Wave 2 predicted residualized decreases in their internalizing and externalizing symptoms at Wave 3. Wave 2 social problem solving also predicted residualized increases in their social competence at Wave 3. Results are discussed in the context of how they advance developmental models of constructive family conflict. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001952","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examined children's emotion situation knowledge and social problem-solving abilities as mediators in the prospective link between constructive interparental conflict (IPC) and children's psychological adjustment in a sample of 238 preschool children (Mage = 4.38 years; 52% female children; 28% Black; 14% multiracial or other race; 16% Latinx) and their mothers. The methodological approach consisted of multiple methods and informants in a longitudinal design with three annual measurement occasions (i.e., preschool, kindergarten, first grade). Results of the path analysis indicated that Wave 1 constructive IPC predicted residualized increases in children's emotion situation knowledge and social problem solving at Wave 2 with the inclusion of hostile IPC, demographic factors, and prior child characteristics (i.e., child age, race, internalizing and externalizing symptoms, social competence) as simultaneous predictors. In turn, children's emotion situation knowledge at Wave 2 predicted residualized decreases in their internalizing and externalizing symptoms at Wave 3. Wave 2 social problem solving also predicted residualized increases in their social competence at Wave 3. Results are discussed in the context of how they advance developmental models of constructive family conflict. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.