Differentiating idiopathic Parkinson's disease from multiple system atrophy-P using brain MRI-based radiomics: a multicenter study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864251318865
Yin-Hui Huang, Mei-Li Yang, Yuan-Zhe Li, Ya-Fang Chen, Chi Cai, Jing Huang, Yi Wang, Tie-Qiang Li, Qin-Yong Ye
{"title":"Differentiating idiopathic Parkinson's disease from multiple system atrophy-P using brain MRI-based radiomics: a multicenter study.","authors":"Yin-Hui Huang, Mei-Li Yang, Yuan-Zhe Li, Ya-Fang Chen, Chi Cai, Jing Huang, Yi Wang, Tie-Qiang Li, Qin-Yong Ye","doi":"10.1177/17562864251318865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differentiating idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) from multiple system atrophy-parkinsonian type (MSA-P) is essential for optimizing patient care and prognosis, given the differences in disease progression and treatment response.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop and evaluate a radiomics-based model using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived features to distinguish IPD from MSA-P.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multicenter retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter retrospective study was conducted with 287 patients (186 IPD and 101 MSA-P) who underwent brain MRI. Radiomic features were extracted from T1-weighted imaging and T2-weighted imaging sequences, and various machine learning classifiers were applied, including logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), ExtraTrees, extreme gradient boosting, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. A nomogram combining clinical and radiomic features was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SVM model, selected as the base for the Rad-signature, achieved the best diagnostic performance, with AUCs of 0.885 and 0.900 in the training and testing cohorts, respectively. The Rad-signature significantly outperformed clinical-only models in distinguishing IPD from MSA-P. The nomogram incorporating radiomic and clinical features yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.973 and 0.963 for training and testing cohorts, respectively) and balanced sensitivity and specificity. Decision curve analysis confirmed the nomogram's clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiomics-based MRI analysis offers a powerful tool for distinguishing IPD from MSA-P, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, and aiding personalized treatment planning. Integrating radiomic and clinical data may improve diagnostic workflows in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251318865"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864251318865","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Differentiating idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) from multiple system atrophy-parkinsonian type (MSA-P) is essential for optimizing patient care and prognosis, given the differences in disease progression and treatment response.

Objectives: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a radiomics-based model using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived features to distinguish IPD from MSA-P.

Design: A multicenter retrospective study.

Methods: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted with 287 patients (186 IPD and 101 MSA-P) who underwent brain MRI. Radiomic features were extracted from T1-weighted imaging and T2-weighted imaging sequences, and various machine learning classifiers were applied, including logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), ExtraTrees, extreme gradient boosting, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. A nomogram combining clinical and radiomic features was also evaluated.

Results: The SVM model, selected as the base for the Rad-signature, achieved the best diagnostic performance, with AUCs of 0.885 and 0.900 in the training and testing cohorts, respectively. The Rad-signature significantly outperformed clinical-only models in distinguishing IPD from MSA-P. The nomogram incorporating radiomic and clinical features yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.973 and 0.963 for training and testing cohorts, respectively) and balanced sensitivity and specificity. Decision curve analysis confirmed the nomogram's clinical utility.

Conclusion: Radiomics-based MRI analysis offers a powerful tool for distinguishing IPD from MSA-P, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, and aiding personalized treatment planning. Integrating radiomic and clinical data may improve diagnostic workflows in clinical practice.

基于脑mri的放射组学鉴别特发性帕金森病和多系统萎缩- p:一项多中心研究
背景:鉴于疾病进展和治疗反应的差异,区分特发性帕金森病(IPD)和多系统萎缩-帕金森型(MSA-P)对于优化患者护理和预后至关重要。目的:本研究旨在利用磁共振成像(MRI)衍生特征开发和评估基于放射组学的模型,以区分IPD和MSA-P。设计:多中心回顾性研究。方法:对287例(IPD 186例,MSA-P 101例)行脑MRI检查的患者进行多中心回顾性研究。从t1加权成像和t2加权成像序列中提取放射学特征,并应用各种机器学习分类器,包括逻辑回归、支持向量机(SVM)、ExtraTrees、极端梯度增强和光梯度增强机。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、准确性、灵敏度和特异性评估模型的性能。结合临床和放射学特征的nomogram也被评估。结果:选择SVM模型作为Rad-signature的基础,其诊断效果最好,在训练队列和测试队列的auc分别为0.885和0.900。在区分IPD和MSA-P方面,rad标记明显优于临床模型。结合放射组学和临床特征的nomogram诊断准确性最高(训练组和测试组的AUC分别为0.973和0.963),并且平衡了敏感性和特异性。决策曲线分析证实了nomogram临床应用价值。结论:基于放射组学的MRI分析为区分IPD和MSA-P提供了强有力的工具,提高了诊断准确性,有助于个性化治疗计划。整合放射学和临床数据可以改善临床实践中的诊断工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信