Epidemiology of Hikikomori: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 studies.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1111/pcn.13768
Wei Zhang, Meng-Yi Chen, Yuan Feng, Zhaohui Su, Teris Cheung, Todd Jackson, Qinge Zhang, Yu-Tao Xiang
{"title":"Epidemiology of Hikikomori: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 studies.","authors":"Wei Zhang, Meng-Yi Chen, Yuan Feng, Zhaohui Su, Teris Cheung, Todd Jackson, Qinge Zhang, Yu-Tao Xiang","doi":"10.1111/pcn.13768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Hikikomori, a severe form of social withdrawal, has been recognized as an important global public health problem. However, estimates of the worldwide Hikikomori prevalence have been inconsistent. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the cross-cultural prevalence of Hikikomori through a meta-analysis and systematic review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched multiple databases (including PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) for relevant studies. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses for categorical variables and meta-regression analyses for continuous variables were performed to identify potential moderators of Hikikomori prevalence estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 studies based on 58,229 participants were included for analysis. The overall prevalence of Hikikomori was 8.0% (95% CI, 4.9%-12.9%). The prevalence of Hikikomori did not differ significantly between regions (East Asia and Western), time periods (pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic), sex, sample size, or presence versus absence of psychiatric disorders. In contrast, higher prevalence rates were reported in studies using the 25-item Hikikomori Questionnaire (HQ-25) (21.7%; 95% CI, 11.8%-36.4%) versus other questionnaires (5.0%; 95% CI, 3.1%-7.9%, [P < 0.01]) and nonprobability sampling (12.5%; 95% CI, 7.9%-19.2%) versus probability sampling methods (3.1%; 95% CI, 1.4%-6.9% [P < 0.01]). Lower study quality (coefficient = -0.45, P = 0.03) and older age were also linked to higher prevalence (coefficient = 0.10, P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that Hikikomori is a common problem globally. The results highlight the importance of using standardized diagnostic tools as well as further research on moderating factors and intervention methods to alleviate disabling experiences associated with Hikikomori.</p>","PeriodicalId":20938,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"138-146"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.13768","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Hikikomori, a severe form of social withdrawal, has been recognized as an important global public health problem. However, estimates of the worldwide Hikikomori prevalence have been inconsistent. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the cross-cultural prevalence of Hikikomori through a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Methods: We systematically searched multiple databases (including PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) for relevant studies. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses for categorical variables and meta-regression analyses for continuous variables were performed to identify potential moderators of Hikikomori prevalence estimates.

Results: A total of 19 studies based on 58,229 participants were included for analysis. The overall prevalence of Hikikomori was 8.0% (95% CI, 4.9%-12.9%). The prevalence of Hikikomori did not differ significantly between regions (East Asia and Western), time periods (pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic), sex, sample size, or presence versus absence of psychiatric disorders. In contrast, higher prevalence rates were reported in studies using the 25-item Hikikomori Questionnaire (HQ-25) (21.7%; 95% CI, 11.8%-36.4%) versus other questionnaires (5.0%; 95% CI, 3.1%-7.9%, [P < 0.01]) and nonprobability sampling (12.5%; 95% CI, 7.9%-19.2%) versus probability sampling methods (3.1%; 95% CI, 1.4%-6.9% [P < 0.01]). Lower study quality (coefficient = -0.45, P = 0.03) and older age were also linked to higher prevalence (coefficient = 0.10, P = 0.01).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that Hikikomori is a common problem globally. The results highlight the importance of using standardized diagnostic tools as well as further research on moderating factors and intervention methods to alleviate disabling experiences associated with Hikikomori.

隐蔽青年的流行病学:19项研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:“隐蔽青年”是一种严重的社会退缩形式,已被公认为一个重要的全球公共卫生问题。然而,对全球“隐蔽青年”患病率的估计并不一致。本研究旨在通过荟萃分析和系统回顾,对“隐蔽青年”的跨文化流行状况进行全面评估。方法:系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Web of Science等多个数据库进行相关研究。使用随机效应模型计算合并患病率估计值。对分类变量进行亚组分析,对连续变量进行元回归分析,以确定隐蔽青年患病率估计的潜在调节因子。结果:共纳入19项研究,涉及58,229名参与者。隐蔽青年的总体患病率为8.0% (95% CI, 4.9%-12.9%)。隐蔽青年的患病率在地区(东亚和西方)、时间段(covid -19大流行之前和之后)、性别、样本量或存在与不存在精神疾病之间没有显著差异。相比之下,使用25项“隐蔽青年问卷”(HQ-25)的研究报告的患病率更高(21.7%;95% CI, 11.8%-36.4%)与其他问卷(5.0%;95% CI, 3.1%-7.9%, [P < 0.01])和非概率抽样(12.5%;95% CI, 7.9%-19.2%)与概率抽样方法(3.1%;95% CI, 1.4%-6.9% [P]结论:本荟萃分析表明,“隐蔽青年”是全球普遍存在的问题。研究结果强调了使用标准化诊断工具以及进一步研究调节因素和干预方法以减轻与“隐蔽青年”相关的致残经历的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: PCN (Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences) Publication Frequency: Published 12 online issues a year by JSPN Content Categories: Review Articles Regular Articles Letters to the Editor Peer Review Process: All manuscripts undergo peer review by anonymous reviewers, an Editorial Board Member, and the Editor Publication Criteria: Manuscripts are accepted based on quality, originality, and significance to the readership Authors must confirm that the manuscript has not been published or submitted elsewhere and has been approved by each author
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信