A Joint Conversation: People With Cystic Fibrosis' Perception of Healthcare Teams' Knowledge, Comfort, and Barriers in Discussing Substance Use.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Sanaz Vaziri, Meghan E McGarry, Addison A Cuneo, Shaina M Willen, Kensho Iwanaga, Fatima Neemuchwala, Elizabeth R Gibb, Marilynn Chan, Ngoc P Ly
{"title":"A Joint Conversation: People With Cystic Fibrosis' Perception of Healthcare Teams' Knowledge, Comfort, and Barriers in Discussing Substance Use.","authors":"Sanaz Vaziri, Meghan E McGarry, Addison A Cuneo, Shaina M Willen, Kensho Iwanaga, Fatima Neemuchwala, Elizabeth R Gibb, Marilynn Chan, Ngoc P Ly","doi":"10.1002/ppul.71017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substance use has increased among people with CF (pwCF), yet communication about use remains understudied between pwCF and their healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Investigate pwCF's perceptions regarding their healthcare team's discussions surrounding substance use, comfort level discussing such usage, and barriers encountered during these discussions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used a one-time electronic survey to assess communication regarding substance use between pwCF aged 13 years and older and their CF healthcare team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 226 participants, 74% (n = 167) reported being asked about marijuana, 57% (n = 128) about CBD, 70% (n = 150) about e-cigarettes, and 88% (n = 189) about cigarettes by their CF healthcare team. Fewer providers discussed the risks and benefits of each substance: 47% (n = 107) for marijuana, 40% (n = 90) for CBD, 44% (n = 99) for e-cigarettes, and 61% (n = 138) for cigarettes. Provider knowledge was rated higher for cigarettes and e-cigarettes compared to marijuana and CBD. Most participants felt comfortable discussing substance use, though a minority expressed discomfort, mainly due to concerns about documentation in medical records and perceived lack of support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights variability in communication between pwCF and their healthcare teams regarding substance use, particularly when it comes to marijuana and CBD. The findings suggest a need for standardized guidelines and educational resources to improve recreational substance screening and discussion in CF clinical care, especially given the changing landscape of marijuana regulations and increasing use among pwCF.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"60 3","pages":"e71017"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Substance use has increased among people with CF (pwCF), yet communication about use remains understudied between pwCF and their healthcare providers.

Objective: Investigate pwCF's perceptions regarding their healthcare team's discussions surrounding substance use, comfort level discussing such usage, and barriers encountered during these discussions.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used a one-time electronic survey to assess communication regarding substance use between pwCF aged 13 years and older and their CF healthcare team.

Results: Of 226 participants, 74% (n = 167) reported being asked about marijuana, 57% (n = 128) about CBD, 70% (n = 150) about e-cigarettes, and 88% (n = 189) about cigarettes by their CF healthcare team. Fewer providers discussed the risks and benefits of each substance: 47% (n = 107) for marijuana, 40% (n = 90) for CBD, 44% (n = 99) for e-cigarettes, and 61% (n = 138) for cigarettes. Provider knowledge was rated higher for cigarettes and e-cigarettes compared to marijuana and CBD. Most participants felt comfortable discussing substance use, though a minority expressed discomfort, mainly due to concerns about documentation in medical records and perceived lack of support.

Conclusion: This study highlights variability in communication between pwCF and their healthcare teams regarding substance use, particularly when it comes to marijuana and CBD. The findings suggest a need for standardized guidelines and educational resources to improve recreational substance screening and discussion in CF clinical care, especially given the changing landscape of marijuana regulations and increasing use among pwCF.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信