Efficacy of Pharmacological Interventions in Milder Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Minoru Urata, Hitoshi Sakurai, Fumihiko Ueno, Taku Maruki, Teruo Tada, Takahito Uchida, Yasuyuki Matsumoto, Masami Murao, Masayuki Tomita, Hajime Baba, Masaki Kato, Takashi Tsuboi, Koichiro Watanabe
{"title":"Efficacy of Pharmacological Interventions in Milder Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Minoru Urata, Hitoshi Sakurai, Fumihiko Ueno, Taku Maruki, Teruo Tada, Takahito Uchida, Yasuyuki Matsumoto, Masami Murao, Masayuki Tomita, Hajime Baba, Masaki Kato, Takashi Tsuboi, Koichiro Watanabe","doi":"10.1002/npr2.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mild depression lacks a consistent definition across diagnostic criteria and rating scales, posing challenges to standardizing treatment strategies. International guidelines predominantly recommend psychotherapy as the first-line treatment for mild depression, while the use of antidepressants remains contentious. Supplements such as omega-3 fatty acids, St. John's Wort, and magnesium have garnered attention as alternative therapeutic options for depression. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy of pharmacological interventions, including supplements, in the treatment of mild depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed and Embase through November 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating pharmacotherapy or supplements for mild depression diagnosed using standardized criteria. Eligible studies underwent screening and risk of bias assessment utilizing the ROB2 tool. Data on remission rates, symptom improvement, dropout rates, and adverse events were extracted, with meta-analyses conducted where applicable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs comprising 1049 participants met inclusion criteria. Among the agents studied, St. John's Wort was analyzed in two trials, both comparing it to fluoxetine. A meta-analysis found no significant difference in response rates between the two treatments (risk ratio [RR] = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.78-1.18) or dropout rates (RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.62-1.88). For other agents, single studies evaluated their effects. Eicosapentaenoic acid and Rhodiola rosea demonstrated significant improvements in depressive symptoms compared to placebo. In non-blinded trials, magnesium chloride showed efficacy in alleviating depressive symptoms. Other interventions, such as lavender, lemon balm, and transcranial electroacupuncture stimulation, were as effective as antidepressants. Conversely, S-adenosylmethionine did not produce significant improvements relative to placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review demonstrates that certain supplements, such as eicosapentaenoic acids and Rhodiola rosea, are therapeutic options for mild depression. However, no RCTs compared antidepressants directly to placebo for mild depression. The paucity of high-quality RCTs exclusively targeting mild depression limits definitive conclusions, warranting further rigorous research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19137,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","volume":"45 1","pages":"e70008"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/npr2.70008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mild depression lacks a consistent definition across diagnostic criteria and rating scales, posing challenges to standardizing treatment strategies. International guidelines predominantly recommend psychotherapy as the first-line treatment for mild depression, while the use of antidepressants remains contentious. Supplements such as omega-3 fatty acids, St. John's Wort, and magnesium have garnered attention as alternative therapeutic options for depression. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy of pharmacological interventions, including supplements, in the treatment of mild depression.

Methods: Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed and Embase through November 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating pharmacotherapy or supplements for mild depression diagnosed using standardized criteria. Eligible studies underwent screening and risk of bias assessment utilizing the ROB2 tool. Data on remission rates, symptom improvement, dropout rates, and adverse events were extracted, with meta-analyses conducted where applicable.

Results: Eight RCTs comprising 1049 participants met inclusion criteria. Among the agents studied, St. John's Wort was analyzed in two trials, both comparing it to fluoxetine. A meta-analysis found no significant difference in response rates between the two treatments (risk ratio [RR] = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.78-1.18) or dropout rates (RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.62-1.88). For other agents, single studies evaluated their effects. Eicosapentaenoic acid and Rhodiola rosea demonstrated significant improvements in depressive symptoms compared to placebo. In non-blinded trials, magnesium chloride showed efficacy in alleviating depressive symptoms. Other interventions, such as lavender, lemon balm, and transcranial electroacupuncture stimulation, were as effective as antidepressants. Conversely, S-adenosylmethionine did not produce significant improvements relative to placebo.

Conclusion: This review demonstrates that certain supplements, such as eicosapentaenoic acids and Rhodiola rosea, are therapeutic options for mild depression. However, no RCTs compared antidepressants directly to placebo for mild depression. The paucity of high-quality RCTs exclusively targeting mild depression limits definitive conclusions, warranting further rigorous research.

药物干预对轻度抑郁症的疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:轻度抑郁症在诊断标准和评定量表中缺乏一致的定义,这对标准化治疗策略提出了挑战。国际指导方针主要推荐心理治疗作为轻度抑郁症的一线治疗,而抗抑郁药的使用仍然存在争议。omega-3脂肪酸、圣约翰草和镁等补充剂作为治疗抑郁症的替代疗法已经引起了人们的关注。本系统综述旨在评估包括补充剂在内的药物干预治疗轻度抑郁症的疗效。方法:到2024年11月,在PubMed和Embase中进行综合检索,以确定随机对照试验(rct),研究使用标准化标准诊断的轻度抑郁症的药物治疗或补充剂。使用ROB2工具对符合条件的研究进行筛选和风险偏倚评估。提取了缓解率、症状改善、辍学率和不良事件的数据,并在适用的情况下进行了荟萃分析。结果:8项rct包括1049名受试者符合纳入标准。在研究的药物中,圣约翰草在两个试验中进行了分析,都将其与氟西汀进行了比较。荟萃分析发现两种治疗的有效率(风险比[RR] = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.78-1.18)或退出率(RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.62-1.88)无显著差异。对于其他药物,单个研究评估了它们的效果。与安慰剂相比,二十碳五烯酸和红景天对抑郁症状有显著改善。在非盲法试验中,氯化镁显示出缓解抑郁症状的疗效。其他干预措施,如薰衣草、柠檬香蜂草和经颅电针刺激,与抗抑郁药一样有效。相反,s -腺苷蛋氨酸与安慰剂相比没有显著改善。结论:本综述表明,某些补充剂,如二十碳五烯酸和红景天,是轻度抑郁症的治疗选择。然而,没有随机对照试验直接比较抗抑郁药和安慰剂治疗轻度抑郁症。专门针对轻度抑郁症的高质量随机对照试验的缺乏限制了明确的结论,需要进一步严格的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信