Polygenic Risk Score Combined with Transcranial Sonography Refines Parkinson's Disease Risk Prediction.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mart Kals, Anu Reigo, Maris Teder-Laving, Mariliis Vaht, Tiit Nikopensius, Andres Metspalu, Toomas Toomsoo
{"title":"Polygenic Risk Score Combined with Transcranial Sonography Refines Parkinson's Disease Risk Prediction.","authors":"Mart Kals, Anu Reigo, Maris Teder-Laving, Mariliis Vaht, Tiit Nikopensius, Andres Metspalu, Toomas Toomsoo","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dopaminergic neuron depletion in the substantia nigra (SN) and the pathological aggregation of α-synuclein are the neuropathological hallmarks of Parkinson's disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the association between the polygenic risk score for PD (PD-PRS) and transcranial sonography (TCS)-measured SN hyperechogenicity to enhance the accuracy of PD susceptibility prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PD-PRSs were calculated for over 41,000 Estonian Biobank participants age 55+ years without a PD diagnosis. Participants in the highest and lowest PD-PRS percentiles (n = 222) underwent TCS measurements and Sniffin' sticks olfactory testing. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine the associations between PD-PRS, risk and prodromal markers, and SN hyperechogenicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 204 participants with TCS measurements were analyzed, including 107 individuals in the high-risk PD-PRS group and 97 in the low-risk PD-PRS group. Incorporating PD-PRS group assignment improved the explained variance in SN hyperechogenicity from 17.2% to 31.9%. Participants in the low-risk PD-PRS group had 0.16 times lower odds (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.07-0.35, P < 0.001) of developing SN hyperechogenicity compared to high-risk PD-PRS individuals. Each unit increase in the Sniffin' sticks olfactory test score was significantly associated with reduced odds of SN hyperechogenicity (adjusted odds ratio = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.47-0.78, P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that TCS-measured SN hyperechogenicity is associated with PD-PRS and olfactory impairment. This combined assessment may improve early diagnosis of prodromal PD by pinpointing individuals at increased risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dopaminergic neuron depletion in the substantia nigra (SN) and the pathological aggregation of α-synuclein are the neuropathological hallmarks of Parkinson's disease (PD).

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the association between the polygenic risk score for PD (PD-PRS) and transcranial sonography (TCS)-measured SN hyperechogenicity to enhance the accuracy of PD susceptibility prediction.

Methods: PD-PRSs were calculated for over 41,000 Estonian Biobank participants age 55+ years without a PD diagnosis. Participants in the highest and lowest PD-PRS percentiles (n = 222) underwent TCS measurements and Sniffin' sticks olfactory testing. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine the associations between PD-PRS, risk and prodromal markers, and SN hyperechogenicity.

Results: Data from 204 participants with TCS measurements were analyzed, including 107 individuals in the high-risk PD-PRS group and 97 in the low-risk PD-PRS group. Incorporating PD-PRS group assignment improved the explained variance in SN hyperechogenicity from 17.2% to 31.9%. Participants in the low-risk PD-PRS group had 0.16 times lower odds (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.07-0.35, P < 0.001) of developing SN hyperechogenicity compared to high-risk PD-PRS individuals. Each unit increase in the Sniffin' sticks olfactory test score was significantly associated with reduced odds of SN hyperechogenicity (adjusted odds ratio = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.47-0.78, P = 0.002).

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that TCS-measured SN hyperechogenicity is associated with PD-PRS and olfactory impairment. This combined assessment may improve early diagnosis of prodromal PD by pinpointing individuals at increased risk.

多基因风险评分联合经颅超声改善帕金森病风险预测。
背景:黑质多巴胺能神经元耗损和α-突触核蛋白的病理聚集是帕金森病(PD)的神经病理标志。目的:本研究旨在探讨PD多基因风险评分(PD- prs)与经颅超声(TCS)测量SN高回声度的相关性,以提高PD易感性预测的准确性。方法:计算超过41,000名爱沙尼亚生物银行参与者的PD- prs,年龄55岁以上,无PD诊断。PD-PRS百分位数最高和最低的参与者(n = 222)进行了TCS测量和嗅探棒嗅觉测试。采用多变量logistic回归模型检验PD-PRS、风险和前驱标志物与SN高回声性之间的关系。结果:分析了204名受试者的TCS测量数据,其中高危PD-PRS组107人,低危PD-PRS组97人。结合PD-PRS分组将SN高回声解释方差从17.2%提高到31.9%。低危PD-PRS组患者的风险低0.16倍(95%可信区间(CI) = 0.07-0.35, P)。结论:tcs测量的SN高回声性与PD-PRS和嗅觉障碍有关。这种综合评估可以通过精确定位风险增加的个体来改善前驱帕金森病的早期诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信