Efficacy of ultrasound-guided piriformis muscle corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shockwave therapy in patients with piriformis syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yu-Shan Fu, Kao-Shang Shih, Yu-Ting Lin, Lin-Fen Hsieh, Ya-Fang Liu, Yann-Rong Chen
{"title":"Efficacy of ultrasound-guided piriformis muscle corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shockwave therapy in patients with piriformis syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yu-Shan Fu, Kao-Shang Shih, Yu-Ting Lin, Lin-Fen Hsieh, Ya-Fang Liu, Yann-Rong Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jfma.2025.01.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Piriformis syndrome (PS) is a condition that causes low back pain. Ultrasound-guided injection (USI) has become a popular option for diagnostic block and treatment. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is widely used for treating musculoskeletal diseases. However, few studies have compared the therapeutic efficacy of local steroid injections and ESWT.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the therapeutic efficacy of local corticosteroid injections and ESWT against PS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 70 patients, who were randomly divided into two groups: the ESWT and USI groups. The ESWT group was subjected to one session of ESWT, and the USI group received one USI. Patients in both groups performed home-based stretching exercises. Evaluations were conducted at baseline and 1 and 5 weeks after the intervention. The outcomes included the patients' pain scores on a visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), hip range of motion, side effects, and self-evaluation data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The groups did not vary significantly in terms of demographics. Significant time effects were observed in both groups, indicating post-treatment improvements. Furthermore, significant group effects were discovered in ODI and VAS pain scores. However, determining the superiority of one treatment over the other was challenging because of significant pretreatment differences between the groups in terms of ODI and VAS pain scores. However, no significant between-group difference was noted in the improvement rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ESWT and USI appear to be effective in the treatment of PS. The levels of efficacy of the two treatment approaches may be similar.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>NCT04684537.</p>","PeriodicalId":17305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.01.020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Piriformis syndrome (PS) is a condition that causes low back pain. Ultrasound-guided injection (USI) has become a popular option for diagnostic block and treatment. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is widely used for treating musculoskeletal diseases. However, few studies have compared the therapeutic efficacy of local steroid injections and ESWT.

Objectives: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of local corticosteroid injections and ESWT against PS.

Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 70 patients, who were randomly divided into two groups: the ESWT and USI groups. The ESWT group was subjected to one session of ESWT, and the USI group received one USI. Patients in both groups performed home-based stretching exercises. Evaluations were conducted at baseline and 1 and 5 weeks after the intervention. The outcomes included the patients' pain scores on a visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), hip range of motion, side effects, and self-evaluation data.

Results: The groups did not vary significantly in terms of demographics. Significant time effects were observed in both groups, indicating post-treatment improvements. Furthermore, significant group effects were discovered in ODI and VAS pain scores. However, determining the superiority of one treatment over the other was challenging because of significant pretreatment differences between the groups in terms of ODI and VAS pain scores. However, no significant between-group difference was noted in the improvement rate.

Conclusions: ESWT and USI appear to be effective in the treatment of PS. The levels of efficacy of the two treatment approaches may be similar.

Clinical trial registration number: NCT04684537.

超声波引导下梨状肌皮质类固醇注射与体外冲击波疗法对梨状肌综合征患者的疗效对比:随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (JFMA), published continuously since 1902, is an open access international general medical journal of the Formosan Medical Association based in Taipei, Taiwan. It is indexed in Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Medline, ciSearch, CAB Abstracts, Embase, SIIC Data Bases, Research Alert, BIOSIS, Biological Abstracts, Scopus and ScienceDirect. As a general medical journal, research related to clinical practice and research in all fields of medicine and related disciplines are considered for publication. Article types considered include perspectives, reviews, original papers, case reports, brief communications, correspondence and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信