Resting-State Brain Network Characteristics Related to Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Preliminary fNIRS Proof-of-Concept Study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Guohui Yang, Chenyu Fan, Haozheng Li, Yu Tong, Shuang Lin, Yashuo Feng, Fengzhi Liu, Chunrong Bao, Hongyu Xie, Yi Wu
{"title":"Resting-State Brain Network Characteristics Related to Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Preliminary fNIRS Proof-of-Concept Study.","authors":"Guohui Yang, Chenyu Fan, Haozheng Li, Yu Tong, Shuang Lin, Yashuo Feng, Fengzhi Liu, Chunrong Bao, Hongyu Xie, Yi Wu","doi":"10.31083/JIN26406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigates the reliability of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in detecting resting-state brain network characteristics in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), focusing on static resting-state functional connectivity (sRSFC) and dynamic resting-state functional connectivity (dRSFC) patterns in MCI patients and healthy controls (HCs) without cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 89 MCI patients and 83 HCs were characterized using neuropsychological scales. Subject sRSFC strength and dRSFC variability coefficients were evaluated via fNIRS. The study evaluated the feasibility of using fNIRS to measure these connectivity metrics and compared resting-state brain network characteristics between the two groups. Correlations with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores were also explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>sRSFC strength in homologous brain networks was significantly lower than in heterologous networks (<i>p</i> < 0.05). A significant negative correlation was also observed between sRSFC strength and dRSFC variability at both the group and individual levels (<i>p</i> < 0.001). While sRSFC strength did not differentiate between MCI patients and HCs, the dRSFC variability between the dorsal attention network (DAN) and default mode network (DMN), and between the ventral attention network (VAN) and visual network (VIS), emerged as sensitive biomarkers after false discovery rate correction (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between MoCA scores and connectivity measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>fNIRS can be used to study resting-state brain networks, with dRSFC variability being more sensitive than sRSFC strength for discriminating between MCI patients and HCs. The DAN-DMN and VAN-VIS regions were found to be particularly useful for the identification of dRSFC differences between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR2200057281, registered on 6 March, 2022; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=133808.</p>","PeriodicalId":16160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of integrative neuroscience","volume":"24 2","pages":"26406"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of integrative neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/JIN26406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study investigates the reliability of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in detecting resting-state brain network characteristics in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), focusing on static resting-state functional connectivity (sRSFC) and dynamic resting-state functional connectivity (dRSFC) patterns in MCI patients and healthy controls (HCs) without cognitive impairment.

Methods: A total of 89 MCI patients and 83 HCs were characterized using neuropsychological scales. Subject sRSFC strength and dRSFC variability coefficients were evaluated via fNIRS. The study evaluated the feasibility of using fNIRS to measure these connectivity metrics and compared resting-state brain network characteristics between the two groups. Correlations with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores were also explored.

Results: sRSFC strength in homologous brain networks was significantly lower than in heterologous networks (p < 0.05). A significant negative correlation was also observed between sRSFC strength and dRSFC variability at both the group and individual levels (p < 0.001). While sRSFC strength did not differentiate between MCI patients and HCs, the dRSFC variability between the dorsal attention network (DAN) and default mode network (DMN), and between the ventral attention network (VAN) and visual network (VIS), emerged as sensitive biomarkers after false discovery rate correction (p < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between MoCA scores and connectivity measures.

Conclusions: fNIRS can be used to study resting-state brain networks, with dRSFC variability being more sensitive than sRSFC strength for discriminating between MCI patients and HCs. The DAN-DMN and VAN-VIS regions were found to be particularly useful for the identification of dRSFC differences between the two groups.

Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR2200057281, registered on 6 March, 2022; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=133808.

与轻度认知障碍相关的静息状态脑网络特征:一项初步的fNIRS概念验证研究。
背景:本研究探讨了功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)检测轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者静息状态脑网络特征的可靠性,重点研究了MCI患者和无认知障碍健康对照(hc)的静态静息状态功能连接(sRSFC)和动态静息状态功能连接(dRSFC)模式。方法:采用神经心理学量表对89例MCI患者和83例hc患者进行特征分析。通过近红外光谱(fNIRS)评估受试者sRSFC强度和dRSFC变异系数。该研究评估了使用fNIRS测量这些连接指标的可行性,并比较了两组之间静息状态的大脑网络特征。还探讨了与蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评分的相关性。结果:同种脑网络的sRSFC强度显著低于异种脑网络(p < 0.05)。在组和个体水平上,sRSFC强度和dRSFC变异性之间也观察到显著的负相关(p < 0.001)。虽然sRSFC强度在MCI患者和hcc患者之间没有差异,但在错误发现率校正后,背侧注意网络(DAN)和默认模式网络(DMN)以及腹侧注意网络(VAN)和视觉网络(VIS)之间的dRSFC变异性成为敏感的生物标志物(p < 0.05)。MoCA评分与连通性测量之间无显著相关性。结论:fNIRS可用于研究静息状态脑网络,在区分MCI患者和hcc患者时,dRSFC变异性比sRSFC强度更敏感。DAN-DMN和VAN-VIS区域被发现对识别两组之间的dRSFC差异特别有用。临床试验注册:ChiCTR2200057281,注册日期为2022年3月6日;https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=133808。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
173
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: JIN is an international peer-reviewed, open access journal. JIN publishes leading-edge research at the interface of theoretical and experimental neuroscience, focusing across hierarchical levels of brain organization to better understand how diverse functions are integrated. We encourage submissions from scientists of all specialties that relate to brain functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信