Trainee perspectives on diversity, equity, and inclusion: a group concept mapping study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2025.2468936
Nicholas Szoko, Ana Radovic, Jennifer E Wolford, Loreta Matheo, Orquidia Torres
{"title":"Trainee perspectives on diversity, equity, and inclusion: a group concept mapping study.","authors":"Nicholas Szoko, Ana Radovic, Jennifer E Wolford, Loreta Matheo, Orquidia Torres","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2025.2468936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Growing work highlights the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in graduate medical education. Few studies have employed participatory research approaches to solicit trainee perspectives related to DEI. Our goal was to utilize group concept mapping (GCM), a mixed-methods participatory research approach, to describe resident perspectives on DEI within a large pediatric residency program. To organize and represent their perspectives on DEI, trainees completed brainstorming, sorting/rating, and interpretation activities in accordance with GCM methodology. Activities occurred via two synchronous discussion sessions (brainstorming and interpretation) and an electronic survey (sorting/rating). Items from the brainstorming session were sorted (i.e. grouped into categories by similarity) and rated (i.e. ranked on perceived importance and likelihood to change) by participants individually. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering were used to generate point maps, cluster maps, and go-zone illustrations for use in the interpretation session. We present data regarding participant characteristics and engagement, results from GCM activities, and action steps from this process. There were a total of 127 trainees in the residency program in 2021-2022. Participation varied across activities (brainstorming session: 21 participants; sorting/rating: 48 participants; interpretation session: 20 participants). A total of 64 unique items were generated from brainstorming. Five clusters emerged: 1) city factors, 2) institutional factors, 3) program representation, 4) program components, 5) non-DEI program perks. Program representation and program components clusters were rated as the most important and the most likely to be changed. Participants identified several action steps during the interpretation session which were shared with institutional leadership to direct programmatic reform. We demonstrate the utility of GCM, a structured and scalable participatory research method, to characterize trainee perceptions of DEI in graduate medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"30 1","pages":"2468936"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2468936","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing work highlights the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in graduate medical education. Few studies have employed participatory research approaches to solicit trainee perspectives related to DEI. Our goal was to utilize group concept mapping (GCM), a mixed-methods participatory research approach, to describe resident perspectives on DEI within a large pediatric residency program. To organize and represent their perspectives on DEI, trainees completed brainstorming, sorting/rating, and interpretation activities in accordance with GCM methodology. Activities occurred via two synchronous discussion sessions (brainstorming and interpretation) and an electronic survey (sorting/rating). Items from the brainstorming session were sorted (i.e. grouped into categories by similarity) and rated (i.e. ranked on perceived importance and likelihood to change) by participants individually. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering were used to generate point maps, cluster maps, and go-zone illustrations for use in the interpretation session. We present data regarding participant characteristics and engagement, results from GCM activities, and action steps from this process. There were a total of 127 trainees in the residency program in 2021-2022. Participation varied across activities (brainstorming session: 21 participants; sorting/rating: 48 participants; interpretation session: 20 participants). A total of 64 unique items were generated from brainstorming. Five clusters emerged: 1) city factors, 2) institutional factors, 3) program representation, 4) program components, 5) non-DEI program perks. Program representation and program components clusters were rated as the most important and the most likely to be changed. Participants identified several action steps during the interpretation session which were shared with institutional leadership to direct programmatic reform. We demonstrate the utility of GCM, a structured and scalable participatory research method, to characterize trainee perceptions of DEI in graduate medical education.

越来越多的工作凸显了医学研究生教育中多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)举措的重要性。很少有研究采用参与式研究方法来征求学员对多元化、公平和包容(DEI)的看法。我们的目标是利用小组概念图(GCM)这一混合方法参与式研究方法来描述大型儿科住院医师培训项目中住院医师对多元化、公平和包容(DEI)的看法。为了组织和表达他们对 DEI 的观点,学员们按照 GCM 方法完成了头脑风暴、分类/评级和解释活动。活动通过两个同步讨论环节(头脑风暴和解读)和一个电子调查(分类/评级)进行。集思广益环节中的项目由参与者单独进行分类(即按相似性分组)和评级(即根据感知的重要性和改变的可能性进行排序)。多维缩放和分层聚类被用于生成点图、聚类图和去区图,供解释会议使用。我们介绍了有关参与者特征和参与度的数据、GCM 活动的结果以及在此过程中采取的行动步骤。2021-2022 年,共有 127 名学员参加了住院医师培训项目。不同活动的参与情况各不相同(头脑风暴会议:21 人参与;分类/评级:48 人参与;解读会议:20 人参与):48 人参加;口译环节:20 人参加)。头脑风暴共产生了 64 个独特的项目。共产生了五组项目:1)城市因素;2)机构因素;3)项目代表性;4)项目组成部分;5)非教育发展研究所项目福利。其中,计划代表性和计划内容被认为是最重要的,也是最有可能改变的。在解释会议期间,与会者确定了几个行动步骤,并与机构领导层分享,以指导计划改革。我们展示了 GCM 这种结构化、可扩展的参与式研究方法在描述受训者对医学研究生教育中 DEI 的看法时的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信