Understanding Implementation Fidelity of Physical Health Screening in Mental Health Nursing: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Issues in Mental Health Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1080/01612840.2025.2464692
Camilla Långstedt, Daniel Bressington, Maritta Välimäki
{"title":"Understanding Implementation Fidelity of Physical Health Screening in Mental Health Nursing: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Camilla Långstedt, Daniel Bressington, Maritta Välimäki","doi":"10.1080/01612840.2025.2464692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physical health screening for patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders is suboptimal despite patients' poor physical health and nurses' willingness to conduct assessments. However, this inadequate service provision is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to describe nurses' adherence to conducting screening with the Finnish Health Improvement Profile and related factors. An explanatory, sequential two-phase mixed-methods design was used. A quantitative method was used to describe nurses' adherence and a qualitative approach to describe moderating factors. The data were collected and analyzed separately and later integrated into one dataset. Generally, screening was implemented as intended regarding content adherence despite very few nurses conducting the screening. Analysis identified four main themes related to adherence. <i>Comprehensiveness of policy description</i> included complexity and duration; <i>strategies to facilitate implementation</i> included fragmented information, instructions, nurses' fragmented work tasks, management and equipment; <i>quality of delivery</i> included preparedness and nurses' confidence and skills; and <i>participant responsiveness</i> included nurses' enthusiasm in screening, nurses' engagement in screening, patient willingness to participate, patient's refusal to participate, patient's cognitive capacity and collaborative screening. For successful screening, the utility and feasibility of the screening tool would need to be reevaluated after addressing some of the barriers identified as moderating factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":14664,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"267-279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2025.2464692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physical health screening for patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders is suboptimal despite patients' poor physical health and nurses' willingness to conduct assessments. However, this inadequate service provision is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to describe nurses' adherence to conducting screening with the Finnish Health Improvement Profile and related factors. An explanatory, sequential two-phase mixed-methods design was used. A quantitative method was used to describe nurses' adherence and a qualitative approach to describe moderating factors. The data were collected and analyzed separately and later integrated into one dataset. Generally, screening was implemented as intended regarding content adherence despite very few nurses conducting the screening. Analysis identified four main themes related to adherence. Comprehensiveness of policy description included complexity and duration; strategies to facilitate implementation included fragmented information, instructions, nurses' fragmented work tasks, management and equipment; quality of delivery included preparedness and nurses' confidence and skills; and participant responsiveness included nurses' enthusiasm in screening, nurses' engagement in screening, patient willingness to participate, patient's refusal to participate, patient's cognitive capacity and collaborative screening. For successful screening, the utility and feasibility of the screening tool would need to be reevaluated after addressing some of the barriers identified as moderating factors.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Issues in Mental Health Nursing NURSINGPSYCHIATRY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Issues in Mental Health Nursing is a refereed journal designed to expand psychiatric and mental health nursing knowledge. It deals with new, innovative approaches to client care, in-depth analysis of current issues, and empirical research. Because clinical research is the primary vehicle for the development of nursing science, the journal presents data-based articles on nursing care provision to clients of all ages in a variety of community and institutional settings. Additionally, the journal publishes theoretical papers and manuscripts addressing mental health promotion, public policy concerns, and educational preparation of mental health nurses. International contributions are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信