Jeroen Meulemans, Laila Mouqni, Noah Ostyn, Davide Di Santo, Greet Hens, Vincent Vander Poorten, Christophe Dooms, Nico De Crem, Paul De Leyn, Ann Goeleven, Pierre Delaere
{"title":"Partial cricotracheal resection for treatment of subglottic stenosis: complications and outcomes.","authors":"Jeroen Meulemans, Laila Mouqni, Noah Ostyn, Davide Di Santo, Greet Hens, Vincent Vander Poorten, Christophe Dooms, Nico De Crem, Paul De Leyn, Ann Goeleven, Pierre Delaere","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1559943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Subglottic stenosis (SGS) is defined as an obstruction of the subglottic area, potentially extending towards the first tracheal rings. Although endoscopic procedures are frequently preferred as first-line treatment, (partial) cricotracheal resection (PCTR) offers the most durable results. This study aims at reporting and analysing complications and respiratory and vocal outcomes after PCTR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this retrospective cohort analysis, the files of 37 patients with SGS who underwent PCTR in a tertiary referral center were reviewed. Patient- and stenosis-characteristics along with postoperative outcomes and complications were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of patients were female (95%), which reflects the high incidence of idiopathic SGS in our patient group (89.2% vs. 2.7% postintubation SGS and 8.1% SGS related to systemic inflammatory disease). Most patients presented with a Cotton grade II (35.1%) and III (54.1%) stenosis, with a mean craniocaudal stenosis length of 17.5 mm. The vast majority of patients (89.2%) had undergone previous endoscopic procedures. The most common complication after PCTR was fibrin deposit/granulation tissue formation at the anastomotic site (<i>n</i> = 15, 40.5%). Other complications were rare, with anastomotic dehiscence, postoperative haemorrhage and vocal cord paralysis each in 1 patient (2.7%), temporary tracheostomy in 2 patients (5.4%), and postoperative wound infection in 3 patients (8.1%). During follow-up, only 2 patients (5.4%) developed restenosis which was successfully salvaged by endoscopic procedures. No patients were long-term tracheostomy dependent. Post-operative mean peak expiratory flow (PEF) percentage showed a 43.7% increase compared to pre-operative. For the mean increase in maximum inspiratory flow (MIF) at 50% this was 1.3 L/s. VHI (voice handicap index) scores increased significantly from baseline preoperative score of 27.5 (±23.7) to a mean value of 54.9 (±18.7) (p = 0.002) 1-month postoperatively but decreased below preoperative scores after 2 years (22.2 ± 18.1, <i>p</i> = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCTR is an efficient treatment for SGS, with low complication rates, a low rate of long-term restenosis and good vocal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"12 ","pages":"1559943"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1559943","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Subglottic stenosis (SGS) is defined as an obstruction of the subglottic area, potentially extending towards the first tracheal rings. Although endoscopic procedures are frequently preferred as first-line treatment, (partial) cricotracheal resection (PCTR) offers the most durable results. This study aims at reporting and analysing complications and respiratory and vocal outcomes after PCTR.
Methods: For this retrospective cohort analysis, the files of 37 patients with SGS who underwent PCTR in a tertiary referral center were reviewed. Patient- and stenosis-characteristics along with postoperative outcomes and complications were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results: The majority of patients were female (95%), which reflects the high incidence of idiopathic SGS in our patient group (89.2% vs. 2.7% postintubation SGS and 8.1% SGS related to systemic inflammatory disease). Most patients presented with a Cotton grade II (35.1%) and III (54.1%) stenosis, with a mean craniocaudal stenosis length of 17.5 mm. The vast majority of patients (89.2%) had undergone previous endoscopic procedures. The most common complication after PCTR was fibrin deposit/granulation tissue formation at the anastomotic site (n = 15, 40.5%). Other complications were rare, with anastomotic dehiscence, postoperative haemorrhage and vocal cord paralysis each in 1 patient (2.7%), temporary tracheostomy in 2 patients (5.4%), and postoperative wound infection in 3 patients (8.1%). During follow-up, only 2 patients (5.4%) developed restenosis which was successfully salvaged by endoscopic procedures. No patients were long-term tracheostomy dependent. Post-operative mean peak expiratory flow (PEF) percentage showed a 43.7% increase compared to pre-operative. For the mean increase in maximum inspiratory flow (MIF) at 50% this was 1.3 L/s. VHI (voice handicap index) scores increased significantly from baseline preoperative score of 27.5 (±23.7) to a mean value of 54.9 (±18.7) (p = 0.002) 1-month postoperatively but decreased below preoperative scores after 2 years (22.2 ± 18.1, p = 0.036).
Conclusion: PCTR is an efficient treatment for SGS, with low complication rates, a low rate of long-term restenosis and good vocal outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.