Dexmedetomidine to Reduce Vasopressor Resistance in Refractory Septic Shock: α2 Agonist Dexmedetomidine for REfractory Septic Shock (ADRESS): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Auguste Dargent, Abderrahmane Bourredjem, Marine Jacquier, Julien Bohe, Laurent Argaud, Bruno Levy, Isabelle Fournel, Amelie Cransac, Julio Badie, Luc Quintin, Jean-Pierre Quenot
{"title":"Dexmedetomidine to Reduce Vasopressor Resistance in Refractory Septic Shock: α2 Agonist Dexmedetomidine for REfractory Septic Shock (ADRESS): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.","authors":"Auguste Dargent, Abderrahmane Bourredjem, Marine Jacquier, Julien Bohe, Laurent Argaud, Bruno Levy, Isabelle Fournel, Amelie Cransac, Julio Badie, Luc Quintin, Jean-Pierre Quenot","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Increasing evidence has suggested the benefits of dexmedetomidine in patients with sepsis. Dexmedetomidine may increase vasopressor sensitivity, which may be of interest in the setting of refractory septic shock. The α2 Agonist Dexmedetomidine for REfractory Septic Shock (ADRESS) pilot study aimed to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on the vasopressor response in patients with refractory septic shock.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted in 5 ICUs in France.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Inclusion criteria were septic shock (Sepsis-3 definition) and norepinephrine requirement greater than or equal to 0.25 µg/kg/min (0.5 µg/kg/min of norepinephrine tartrate) with persistent circulatory failure (defined by lactate > 2 mmol/L, oliguria, or skin mottling) and invasive mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The arterial pressure response to phenylephrine was measured before starting the treatment (0 hr), at 6 hours (primary outcome), and 12 hours. In the treatment arm, dexmedetomidine was given at a fixed dose of 1 µg/kg/hr.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Inclusions were stopped early because of higher mortality in the dexmedetomidine arm. Thirty-two patients of the 36 planned were included. Response to phenylephrine at 6 hours was lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the placebo group (1.26 ± 0.23 vs. 1.45 ± 0.26; p = 0.048), although this difference was also observed at baseline (p = 0.029). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of cumulative norepinephrine dose, lactatemia, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, fluid balance, ventilation-free days, or occurrence of bradycardia. Mortality on day 3 was higher in the dexmedetomidine group than in the placebo group, with a difference that diminished and was no longer significant on 30 and 90 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients in the dexmedetomidine arm had a significantly lower response to phenylephrine at all study times including baseline, which might have contributed to higher early mortality in the dexmedetomidine arm and preclude to conclude on dexmedetomidine efficacy in refractory septic shock. However, heart rate was not decreased in the dexmedetomidine arm.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006608","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Increasing evidence has suggested the benefits of dexmedetomidine in patients with sepsis. Dexmedetomidine may increase vasopressor sensitivity, which may be of interest in the setting of refractory septic shock. The α2 Agonist Dexmedetomidine for REfractory Septic Shock (ADRESS) pilot study aimed to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on the vasopressor response in patients with refractory septic shock.

Design: This study was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot trial.

Setting: The study was conducted in 5 ICUs in France.

Patients: Inclusion criteria were septic shock (Sepsis-3 definition) and norepinephrine requirement greater than or equal to 0.25 µg/kg/min (0.5 µg/kg/min of norepinephrine tartrate) with persistent circulatory failure (defined by lactate > 2 mmol/L, oliguria, or skin mottling) and invasive mechanical ventilation.

Interventions: The arterial pressure response to phenylephrine was measured before starting the treatment (0 hr), at 6 hours (primary outcome), and 12 hours. In the treatment arm, dexmedetomidine was given at a fixed dose of 1 µg/kg/hr.

Measurements and main results: Inclusions were stopped early because of higher mortality in the dexmedetomidine arm. Thirty-two patients of the 36 planned were included. Response to phenylephrine at 6 hours was lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the placebo group (1.26 ± 0.23 vs. 1.45 ± 0.26; p = 0.048), although this difference was also observed at baseline (p = 0.029). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of cumulative norepinephrine dose, lactatemia, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, fluid balance, ventilation-free days, or occurrence of bradycardia. Mortality on day 3 was higher in the dexmedetomidine group than in the placebo group, with a difference that diminished and was no longer significant on 30 and 90 days.

Conclusions: Patients in the dexmedetomidine arm had a significantly lower response to phenylephrine at all study times including baseline, which might have contributed to higher early mortality in the dexmedetomidine arm and preclude to conclude on dexmedetomidine efficacy in refractory septic shock. However, heart rate was not decreased in the dexmedetomidine arm.

右美托咪定降低难治性脓毒性休克患者的血管加压阻力:α2 促效剂右美托咪定治疗难治性脓毒性休克 (ADRESS):双盲随机对照试验。
目的:越来越多的证据表明右美托咪定对脓毒症患者有益。右美托咪定可能增加血管加压药的敏感性,这可能对难治性脓毒性休克的设置感兴趣。α2激动剂右美托咪定治疗难治性脓毒性休克(address)的中试研究旨在评价右美托咪定对难治性脓毒性休克患者血管升压反应的影响。设计:本研究为多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲先导试验。环境:本研究在法国的5个icu中进行。患者:纳入标准为脓毒症休克(脓毒症-3定义)和去甲肾上腺素需氧量大于或等于0.25µg/kg/min(酒石酸去甲肾上腺素0.5µg/kg/min),伴有持续性循环衰竭(以乳酸浓度0.2 mmol/L、少尿或皮肤斑斑为定义)和有创机械通气。干预措施:在开始治疗前(0小时)、6小时(主要结局)和12小时测量对苯肾上腺素的动脉压反应。在治疗组,右美托咪定以1µg/kg/hr的固定剂量给予。测量结果和主要结果:由于右美托咪定组的死亡率较高,早期停止了夹杂物。36例患者中的32例纳入研究。右美托咪定组6小时对苯肾上腺素的反应低于安慰剂组(1.26±0.23∶1.45±0.26;P = 0.048),尽管在基线时也观察到这种差异(P = 0.029)。在累积去甲肾上腺素剂量、乳酸血症、序贯器官衰竭评估评分、体液平衡、无通气天数或心动过缓发生方面,两组间无显著差异。右美托咪定组第3天的死亡率高于安慰剂组,差异在第30天和第90天减弱,不再显著。结论:右美托咪定组的患者在包括基线在内的所有研究时间对苯肾上腺素的反应都明显较低,这可能是右美托咪定组早期死亡率较高的原因,并排除了右美托咪定对难治性脓毒性休克疗效的结论。然而,右美托咪定组的心率没有降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信