Comparative metagenomics reveals limited differences in antimicrobial resistance gene abundance across conventional and natural livestock production systems.

IF 1.8 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Catrione Lee, Rahat Zaheer, Krysty Thomas, Dominic Poulin-Laprade, Guylaine Talbot, Moussa S Diarra, Gary Van Domselaar, Athanasios Zovoilis, Tim A McAllister
{"title":"Comparative metagenomics reveals limited differences in antimicrobial resistance gene abundance across conventional and natural livestock production systems.","authors":"Catrione Lee, Rahat Zaheer, Krysty Thomas, Dominic Poulin-Laprade, Guylaine Talbot, Moussa S Diarra, Gary Van Domselaar, Athanasios Zovoilis, Tim A McAllister","doi":"10.1139/cjm-2024-0191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The livestock industry has been a source of concern in terms of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) development and spread, especially from a One Health perspective. Raising livestock without antimicrobials, so called natural (NAT) production, is an increasingly popular practice. This study used metagenomics to compare this practice to conventional (CONV) antimicrobial use (AMU) on the microbiome and resistome in the feces of beef cattle and swine and the cecal contents of broiler chickens. In cattle, Bacteroidetes, Euryarchaeota, and Spirochaetes were more abundant (<i>q</i> < 0.01) in CONV than NAT systems, with no differences (<i>q</i> > 0.05) in bacterial profiles in either swine or chickens. Classes of antimicrobial resistant genes (ARG) were not impacted regardless of AMU in any of the livestock species. However, many tetracycline resistance genes were more abundant in CONV as compared to NAT swine (<i>q</i> < 0.05), but this difference was not observed in cattle or chickens. This study confirmed that elimination of AMU does not necessarily result in an immediate decline in the abundance or diversity of ARGs within a single livestock production cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":9381,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2024-0191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The livestock industry has been a source of concern in terms of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) development and spread, especially from a One Health perspective. Raising livestock without antimicrobials, so called natural (NAT) production, is an increasingly popular practice. This study used metagenomics to compare this practice to conventional (CONV) antimicrobial use (AMU) on the microbiome and resistome in the feces of beef cattle and swine and the cecal contents of broiler chickens. In cattle, Bacteroidetes, Euryarchaeota, and Spirochaetes were more abundant (q < 0.01) in CONV than NAT systems, with no differences (q > 0.05) in bacterial profiles in either swine or chickens. Classes of antimicrobial resistant genes (ARG) were not impacted regardless of AMU in any of the livestock species. However, many tetracycline resistance genes were more abundant in CONV as compared to NAT swine (q < 0.05), but this difference was not observed in cattle or chickens. This study confirmed that elimination of AMU does not necessarily result in an immediate decline in the abundance or diversity of ARGs within a single livestock production cycle.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1954, the Canadian Journal of Microbiology is a monthly journal that contains new research in the field of microbiology, including applied microbiology and biotechnology; microbial structure and function; fungi and other eucaryotic protists; infection and immunity; microbial ecology; physiology, metabolism and enzymology; and virology, genetics, and molecular biology. It also publishes review articles and notes on an occasional basis, contributed by recognized scientists worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信