Deciphering the Role of FDG-PET/CT Imaging in the Management of Sarcoidosis.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.017
Ryan Donnelly, Alessandro N Franciosi, Sarah H Forde, Michael McDermott, Michael P Keane, David J Murphy, Emmet E McGrath, Cormac McCarthy
{"title":"Deciphering the Role of FDG-PET/CT Imaging in the Management of Sarcoidosis.","authors":"Ryan Donnelly, Alessandro N Franciosi, Sarah H Forde, Michael McDermott, Michael P Keane, David J Murphy, Emmet E McGrath, Cormac McCarthy","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>2-Deoxy-2-[<sup>18</sup>F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG)-PET/CT imaging has utility in identifying sites of active sarcoidosis. However, the role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in predicting treatment response and guiding therapy outside of cardiac disease is yet to be completely understood.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Do physicians agree on the utility of FDG-PET/CT imaging in sarcoid cases, and do they agree on the appropriate treatment response, based on the associated reports?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Physician respondents were presented with a series of anonymized sarcoidosis case vignettes. The perceived utility of FDG-PET/CT imaging in each case, as well as the ultimate treatment decision following provision of FDG-PET/CT results, was assessed. Interrater agreement was assessed overall and per-case vignette specialty, using the Gwet agreement coefficient (AC1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents (n = 215) were predominantly respiratory physicians (86.78%) experienced in sarcoidosis management (94.39%), and one-third of whom had > 20 years of experience (32.66%). Pulmonary sarcoidosis case vignettes had the lowest rates of FDG-PET/CT endorsement among surveyed subspecialties (38%-64%). Overall interrater agreement was assessed among physicians who positively endorsed FDG-PET/CT imaging. Treatment rationalization based on FDG-PET/CT report approached near-chance agreement for pulmonary cases (AC1 = 0.178) (n = 217; 95% CI, 0.125-0.234; P = .07) and multisystem cases (AC1 = 0.296) (n = 168; 95% CI, 0.066-0.477; P = .41), whereas agreement was highest for cases of cardiac sarcoidosis (AC1 = 0.797) (n = 374; 95% CI, 0.759-0.838; P < .05).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our results indicate low agreement between physicians regarding their management of pulmonary sarcoidosis following FDG-PET/CT imaging. This highlights a need for further research and clarity concerning the role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the therapeutic management of pulmonary sarcoidosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG)-PET/CT imaging has utility in identifying sites of active sarcoidosis. However, the role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in predicting treatment response and guiding therapy outside of cardiac disease is yet to be completely understood.

Research question: Do physicians agree on the utility of FDG-PET/CT imaging in sarcoid cases, and do they agree on the appropriate treatment response, based on the associated reports?

Study design and methods: Physician respondents were presented with a series of anonymized sarcoidosis case vignettes. The perceived utility of FDG-PET/CT imaging in each case, as well as the ultimate treatment decision following provision of FDG-PET/CT results, was assessed. Interrater agreement was assessed overall and per-case vignette specialty, using the Gwet agreement coefficient (AC1).

Results: Respondents (n = 215) were predominantly respiratory physicians (86.78%) experienced in sarcoidosis management (94.39%), and one-third of whom had > 20 years of experience (32.66%). Pulmonary sarcoidosis case vignettes had the lowest rates of FDG-PET/CT endorsement among surveyed subspecialties (38%-64%). Overall interrater agreement was assessed among physicians who positively endorsed FDG-PET/CT imaging. Treatment rationalization based on FDG-PET/CT report approached near-chance agreement for pulmonary cases (AC1 = 0.178) (n = 217; 95% CI, 0.125-0.234; P = .07) and multisystem cases (AC1 = 0.296) (n = 168; 95% CI, 0.066-0.477; P = .41), whereas agreement was highest for cases of cardiac sarcoidosis (AC1 = 0.797) (n = 374; 95% CI, 0.759-0.838; P < .05).

Interpretation: Our results indicate low agreement between physicians regarding their management of pulmonary sarcoidosis following FDG-PET/CT imaging. This highlights a need for further research and clarity concerning the role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the therapeutic management of pulmonary sarcoidosis.

解读 FDG-PET/CT 在肉样瘤病治疗中的作用。
背景:氟-2-脱氧葡萄糖-18 (FDG)正电子发射断层扫描(PET/CT)在识别活动性结节病部位方面具有实用价值。然而,FDG-PET/CT在预测治疗反应和指导心脏以外疾病治疗中的作用尚不完全清楚。研究问题:医生是否同意FDG-PET/CT在肉瘤病例中的应用,他们是否同意基于相关报告的适当治疗反应?研究设计和方法:向受访医生展示了一系列匿名结节病病例。评估了每种情况下FDG-PET/CT的感知效用,以及提供FDG-PET/CT结果后的最终治疗决策。使用Gwet的亲和性系数(AC1)对评分者之间的一致性进行了总体评估,并对每个案例的小插曲进行了评估。结果:215名受访医生中,有结节病管理经验的以呼吸内科医生为主(86.78%),有结节病管理经验的占94.39%,其中1 / 3有20年以上的经验(32.66%)。在调查的亚专科中,肺结节病病例的FDG-PET/CT认可率最低(38 - 64%)。评估了积极支持FDG-PET/CT的医生之间的总体评分一致性。基于FDG-PET/CT报告的治疗合理化在肺部AC1=0.178 (N=217, 95% CI 0.125- 0.234, p=0.07)和多系统AC1=0.296 (N=168, 95% CI 0.066 - 0.477, p=0.41)病例中几乎是一致的,而心脏结节病AC1=0.797 (N=374, 95% CI 0.759 - 0.838, p=解释:我们的结果表明,FDG-PET/CT后,医生对肺结节病管理的一致性较低。这表明需要进一步研究和明确FDG-PET/CT在肺结节病治疗管理中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信