Deciphering the role of FDG-PET/CT in the management of sarcoidosis.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.017
Ryan Donnelly, Alessandro N Franciosi, Sarah H Forde, Michael McDermott, Michael P Keane, David J Murphy, Emmet E McGrath, Cormac McCarthy
{"title":"Deciphering the role of FDG-PET/CT in the management of sarcoidosis.","authors":"Ryan Donnelly, Alessandro N Franciosi, Sarah H Forde, Michael McDermott, Michael P Keane, David J Murphy, Emmet E McGrath, Cormac McCarthy","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-18 (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET/CT) has utility in identifying sites of active sarcoidosis. However, the role of FDG-PET/CT in predicting treatment response and guiding therapy outside of cardiac disease is yet to be completely understood.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Do physicians agree on the utility of FDG-PET/CT in sarcoid cases, and do they agree on the appropriate treatment response, based on the associated reports?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Physicians respondents were presented with a series of anonymised sarcoidosis case vignettes. The perceived utility of FDG-PET/CT in each case, as well as the ultimate treatment decision following provision of FDG-PET/CT results was assessed. Inter-rater agreement was assessed overall and per case vignette specialty using Gwet's Agreeability Coefficient (AC1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents (n=215) were predominantly respiratory physicians (86.78%) experienced in sarcoidosis management (94.39%), and a third of whom had >20 years' experience (32.66%). Pulmonary sarcoidosis case vignettes had the lowest rates of FDG-PET/CT endorsement among surveyed subspecialties (38 - 64%). Overall inter-rater agreement was assessed among physicians who positively endorsed an FDG-PET/CT. Treatment rationalisation based on FDG-PET/CT report was near-chance agreement for pulmonary AC1=0.178 (N=217, 95% CI 0.125- 0.234, p=0.07) and multisystem AC1=0.296 (N=168, 95% CI 0.066 - 0.477, p=0.41) cases, while agreement was highest for cases of cardiac sarcoidosis AC1=0.797 (N=374, 95% CI 0.759 - 0.838, p=<0.05).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our results indicate a low agreement between physicians regarding their management of pulmonary sarcoidosis following FDG-PET/CT. This highlights a need for further research and clarity over the role of FDG-PET/CT in the therapeutic management of pulmonary sarcoidosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-18 (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET/CT) has utility in identifying sites of active sarcoidosis. However, the role of FDG-PET/CT in predicting treatment response and guiding therapy outside of cardiac disease is yet to be completely understood.

Research question: Do physicians agree on the utility of FDG-PET/CT in sarcoid cases, and do they agree on the appropriate treatment response, based on the associated reports?

Study design and methods: Physicians respondents were presented with a series of anonymised sarcoidosis case vignettes. The perceived utility of FDG-PET/CT in each case, as well as the ultimate treatment decision following provision of FDG-PET/CT results was assessed. Inter-rater agreement was assessed overall and per case vignette specialty using Gwet's Agreeability Coefficient (AC1).

Results: Respondents (n=215) were predominantly respiratory physicians (86.78%) experienced in sarcoidosis management (94.39%), and a third of whom had >20 years' experience (32.66%). Pulmonary sarcoidosis case vignettes had the lowest rates of FDG-PET/CT endorsement among surveyed subspecialties (38 - 64%). Overall inter-rater agreement was assessed among physicians who positively endorsed an FDG-PET/CT. Treatment rationalisation based on FDG-PET/CT report was near-chance agreement for pulmonary AC1=0.178 (N=217, 95% CI 0.125- 0.234, p=0.07) and multisystem AC1=0.296 (N=168, 95% CI 0.066 - 0.477, p=0.41) cases, while agreement was highest for cases of cardiac sarcoidosis AC1=0.797 (N=374, 95% CI 0.759 - 0.838, p=<0.05).

Interpretation: Our results indicate a low agreement between physicians regarding their management of pulmonary sarcoidosis following FDG-PET/CT. This highlights a need for further research and clarity over the role of FDG-PET/CT in the therapeutic management of pulmonary sarcoidosis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信