Predictors of Improvement in Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter Ablation: Systematic Review.

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.15420/aer.2024.24
Nikhil Ahluwalia, Ahmed Hussain, Rui Providencia, Richard J Schilling
{"title":"Predictors of Improvement in Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter Ablation: Systematic Review.","authors":"Nikhil Ahluwalia, Ahmed Hussain, Rui Providencia, Richard J Schilling","doi":"10.15420/aer.2024.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) can improve after catheter ablation (CA) in many patients with AF. However, prospective prediction of response can be challenging. The aim of this study was, therefore, to perform a systematic literature review of features associated with improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with AF and LVSD undergoing first CA.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases up to 24 January 2024, for studies involving adult patients with LVSD receiving treatment for AF. The focus was on research articles and clinical trials reporting features associated with changes in LVEF following CA. The review followed PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 789 unique articles were reviewed and 20 were included in the systematic review. Sixty-nine per cent (range, 54-79%) of included patients met the criteria for responder status, which were based on LVEF improvement (usually an increase in LVEF >10% or to >50% at follow-up). Baseline surrogates of myocardial fibrosis on MRI (R<sup>2</sup>=-0.67), electroanatomical mapping (R<sup>2</sup>=-0.93) and biochemical surrogates have shown the strongest association with LVEF change. Left atrium and LV chamber size, diastolic dysfunction ECGbased parameters and a known heart failure aetiology have shown prognostic value independently and in combination.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Imaging, clinical and ECG-based surrogates of LV fibrosis may be pre-CA markers of LVEF improvement in patients with AF and LVSD. However, the confounding effect of procedural outcomes should be considered. A composite risk stratification tool would have clinical utility in risk stratification and patient selection; however, prospective studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8412,"journal":{"name":"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review","volume":"14 ","pages":"e02"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2024.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) can improve after catheter ablation (CA) in many patients with AF. However, prospective prediction of response can be challenging. The aim of this study was, therefore, to perform a systematic literature review of features associated with improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with AF and LVSD undergoing first CA.

Method: Systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases up to 24 January 2024, for studies involving adult patients with LVSD receiving treatment for AF. The focus was on research articles and clinical trials reporting features associated with changes in LVEF following CA. The review followed PRISMA guidelines.

Results: A total of 789 unique articles were reviewed and 20 were included in the systematic review. Sixty-nine per cent (range, 54-79%) of included patients met the criteria for responder status, which were based on LVEF improvement (usually an increase in LVEF >10% or to >50% at follow-up). Baseline surrogates of myocardial fibrosis on MRI (R2=-0.67), electroanatomical mapping (R2=-0.93) and biochemical surrogates have shown the strongest association with LVEF change. Left atrium and LV chamber size, diastolic dysfunction ECGbased parameters and a known heart failure aetiology have shown prognostic value independently and in combination.

Discussion: Imaging, clinical and ECG-based surrogates of LV fibrosis may be pre-CA markers of LVEF improvement in patients with AF and LVSD. However, the confounding effect of procedural outcomes should be considered. A composite risk stratification tool would have clinical utility in risk stratification and patient selection; however, prospective studies are needed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信