Diverse toxins exhibit a common binding mode to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Hung N Do, Jessica Z Kubicek-Sutherland, S Gnanakaran
{"title":"Diverse toxins exhibit a common binding mode to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.","authors":"Hung N Do, Jessica Z Kubicek-Sutherland, S Gnanakaran","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2025.02.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are critical ligand-gated ion channels in the human nervous system. They are targets for various neurotoxins produced by algae, plants, and animals. While many structures of nAChRs bound by neurotoxins have been published, the binding mechanism of toxins to the nAChRs remains unclear. In this work, we have performed extensive Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics simulations on several Aplysia californica nAChRs in complex with α-conotoxins, strychnine, and pinnatoxins, as well as human nAChRs in complex with α-bungarotoxin and α-conotoxin, to determine the binding and dissociation pathways of the toxins to the nAChRs and the associated effects. We uncovered two common binding and dissociation pathways shared by toxins and nAChRs. In the first binding pathway, the toxins diffused from the bulk solvent to bind a region near the extracellular pore before moving downwards along the nAChRs to the nAChR orthosteric pocket. The second binding pathway involved a direct diffusion of the toxins from the bulk solvent into the nAChR orthosteric pocket. The dissociation pathways were the reverse of the observed binding pathways. Notably, we determined that the electrostatically bipolar interactions between the nAChR orthosteric pocket and toxins provided an explanation for the common binding mode shared by diverse toxins.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.02.022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are critical ligand-gated ion channels in the human nervous system. They are targets for various neurotoxins produced by algae, plants, and animals. While many structures of nAChRs bound by neurotoxins have been published, the binding mechanism of toxins to the nAChRs remains unclear. In this work, we have performed extensive Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics simulations on several Aplysia californica nAChRs in complex with α-conotoxins, strychnine, and pinnatoxins, as well as human nAChRs in complex with α-bungarotoxin and α-conotoxin, to determine the binding and dissociation pathways of the toxins to the nAChRs and the associated effects. We uncovered two common binding and dissociation pathways shared by toxins and nAChRs. In the first binding pathway, the toxins diffused from the bulk solvent to bind a region near the extracellular pore before moving downwards along the nAChRs to the nAChR orthosteric pocket. The second binding pathway involved a direct diffusion of the toxins from the bulk solvent into the nAChR orthosteric pocket. The dissociation pathways were the reverse of the observed binding pathways. Notably, we determined that the electrostatically bipolar interactions between the nAChR orthosteric pocket and toxins provided an explanation for the common binding mode shared by diverse toxins.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biophysical journal
Biophysical journal 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
3090
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信