Effects of Opioid-based and Opioid-free Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgeries.

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of African Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.4103/aam.aam_137_24
Akshay Hiryur Manjunatha Swamy, G Sneka, Girish Bandigowdanahalli Kumararadhya, Abhilash Chennabasappa, K G Shivakumar, Sheema Umesh
{"title":"Effects of Opioid-based and Opioid-free Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgeries.","authors":"Akshay Hiryur Manjunatha Swamy, G Sneka, Girish Bandigowdanahalli Kumararadhya, Abhilash Chennabasappa, K G Shivakumar, Sheema Umesh","doi":"10.4103/aam.aam_137_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of anesthetic management of patients undergoing surgeries should be to allow physiological changes during surgery with minimal effects on the vitals and rapid recovery from anesthesia with minimal residual effects. Since opioid-based anesthesia is associated with opioid abuse and side effects peri- and postoperatively, we conducted this study to compare the effects of opioid-free anesthesia using dexmedetomidine and ketamine with opioid-based anesthesia using fentanyl in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgeries.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A randomized prospective double-blinded study was undertaken on 70 adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgeries. The patients were equally and randomly divided into two groups: patients in Group A were administered IV dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg body weight and ketamine 25 mg and those in Group B were administered IV fentanyl 2 µg/kg body weight. Comparisons of parameters representing hemodynamic stability were done between the two groups, along with the depth of sedation and adverse effects, if any.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was significantly less increase in heart rate in the dexmedetomidine group than that in the fentanyl group after intubation in intraoperative period as well as after extubation. There was an abrupt decrease in the respiratory rate (RR) at 60 th min in the patients administered fentanyl, and the difference in the fall was statistically significant compared to in those administered dexmedetomidine. In the dexmedetomidine group, there was a good stability of RR with the baseline values at all time intervals. There was a decrease in the mean arterial pressure values in both the groups, the difference being statistically insignificant. The depth of sedation was better in the patients administered dexmedetomidine according to the Ramsay Sedation Score as compared to in those administered fentanyl. The incidence of adverse effects was also lesser in the patients administered dexmedetomidine than in those administered fentanyl.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study concluded that opioid-free anesthesia using dexmedetomidine is better than opioid-based anesthesia using fentanyl for patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgeries due to better perioperative hemodynamic stability, deeper sedation, and lesser adverse effects postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":7938,"journal":{"name":"Annals of African Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"317-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of African Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_137_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of anesthetic management of patients undergoing surgeries should be to allow physiological changes during surgery with minimal effects on the vitals and rapid recovery from anesthesia with minimal residual effects. Since opioid-based anesthesia is associated with opioid abuse and side effects peri- and postoperatively, we conducted this study to compare the effects of opioid-free anesthesia using dexmedetomidine and ketamine with opioid-based anesthesia using fentanyl in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgeries.

Materials and methods: A randomized prospective double-blinded study was undertaken on 70 adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgeries. The patients were equally and randomly divided into two groups: patients in Group A were administered IV dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg body weight and ketamine 25 mg and those in Group B were administered IV fentanyl 2 µg/kg body weight. Comparisons of parameters representing hemodynamic stability were done between the two groups, along with the depth of sedation and adverse effects, if any.

Results: There was significantly less increase in heart rate in the dexmedetomidine group than that in the fentanyl group after intubation in intraoperative period as well as after extubation. There was an abrupt decrease in the respiratory rate (RR) at 60 th min in the patients administered fentanyl, and the difference in the fall was statistically significant compared to in those administered dexmedetomidine. In the dexmedetomidine group, there was a good stability of RR with the baseline values at all time intervals. There was a decrease in the mean arterial pressure values in both the groups, the difference being statistically insignificant. The depth of sedation was better in the patients administered dexmedetomidine according to the Ramsay Sedation Score as compared to in those administered fentanyl. The incidence of adverse effects was also lesser in the patients administered dexmedetomidine than in those administered fentanyl.

Conclusion: This study concluded that opioid-free anesthesia using dexmedetomidine is better than opioid-based anesthesia using fentanyl for patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgeries due to better perioperative hemodynamic stability, deeper sedation, and lesser adverse effects postoperatively.

阿片类药物麻醉与非阿片类药物麻醉在择期腹腔镜手术中的作用。
背景:手术患者麻醉管理的目的应是使术中生理变化对生命体征的影响最小,麻醉后快速恢复,残余影响最小。由于阿片类药物麻醉与阿片类药物滥用和手术前后的副作用有关,我们进行了这项研究,比较了选择性腹腔镜手术患者中使用右美托咪定和氯胺酮的无阿片类药物麻醉与使用芬太尼的阿片类药物麻醉的效果。材料与方法:对70例接受择期腹腔镜手术的成人患者进行随机、前瞻性双盲研究。将患者平均随机分为两组:A组患者静脉给予右美托咪定1 μg/kg体重和氯胺酮25 mg, B组患者静脉给予芬太尼2 μg/kg体重。比较两组之间代表血流动力学稳定性的参数,以及镇静深度和不良反应(如果有的话)。结果:右美托咪定组插管后、术中及拔管后的心率增幅均明显低于芬太尼组。芬太尼组患者呼吸频率(RR)在第60分钟突然下降,与右美托咪定组相比,下降的差异有统计学意义。右美托咪定组RR与基线值在各时间间隔均有良好的稳定性。两组平均动脉压值均有下降,差异无统计学意义。根据Ramsay镇静评分,右美托咪定组的镇静深度优于芬太尼组。服用右美托咪定的患者的不良反应发生率也低于芬太尼的患者。结论:本研究认为,对于择期腹腔镜手术患者,右美托咪定无阿片类药物麻醉优于芬太尼阿片类药物麻醉,因为右美托咪定围手术期血流动力学稳定性更好,镇静作用更深,术后不良反应更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of African Medicine
Annals of African Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Annals of African Medicine is published by the Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria and the Annals of African Medicine Society. The Journal is intended to serve as a medium for the publication of research findings in the broad field of Medicine in Africa and other developing countries, and elsewhere which have relevance to Africa. It will serve as a source of information on the state of the art of Medicine in Africa, for continuing education for doctors in Africa and other developing countries, and also for the publication of meetings and conferences. The journal will publish articles I any field of Medicine and other fields which have relevance or implications for Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信