Mandibular Angle Osteotomy via Intraoral Approach: A 15-Year Experience from a Single Plastic Surgery Center in China.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Zhiyang Xie, Shunchao Yan, Chongxu Qiao, Zai Shi, Jingyi Xu, Kaili Yan, Yuming Qu, Shu Wang, Wensong Shangguan, Guoping Wu
{"title":"Mandibular Angle Osteotomy via Intraoral Approach: A 15-Year Experience from a Single Plastic Surgery Center in China.","authors":"Zhiyang Xie, Shunchao Yan, Chongxu Qiao, Zai Shi, Jingyi Xu, Kaili Yan, Yuming Qu, Shu Wang, Wensong Shangguan, Guoping Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04765-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mandibular angle osteotomy (MAO) using an intraoral approach is a common procedure for correcting square facial contours in the Asian population. While previous retrospective studies have primarily focused on complications rates, limited research has examined time-related trends and the epidemiological characteristics of the surgical population. A comprehensive study with a large sample size and long-term follow-up is crucial to enhance outcomes, minimize complications, provide evidence-based insights, and consolidate clinical experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study reviewed 3,501 MAO cases performed via an intraoral approach between January 2008 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into three cohorts based on admission dates: group A (January 2008 to December 2012), group B (January 2013 to December 2017), and group C (January 2018 to December 2022). Demographic data, complication rates, and patient-reported satisfaction scores were analyzed across the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average ages for groups A, B, and C were 27.38 ± 6.94, 27.41 ± 6.42, and 28.57 ± 6.65 years, respectively, with group C patients being significantly older than those in group B (P < 0.001). Gender distribution showed 48 males and 825 females in group A; 93 males and 1,097 females in group B; and 122 males and 1,316 females in group C, with significant difference between groups A and B (P = 0.039). Complication rates were 13.05% (114 cases) in group A, 5.54% (66 cases) in group B, and 2.50% (36 cases) in group C. Postoperative satisfaction scores for groups A, B, and C were 3.32 ± 0.64, 3.86 ± 0.54, and 4.42 ± 0.58, respectively, with significant improvements across groups (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The demand for MAO has steadily increased, particularly among individuals aged 21 to 40, with a predominance of female patients. Expanding indications have led to more cases involving middle-aged, elderly, and male patients. Advancements in surgical techniques have contributed to better aesthetic outcomes and lower complication rates. The use of modified osteotomy procedures and digital technologies has enabled safer, more precise surgeries across diverse populations, resulting in significant improvements in lower facial contours.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04765-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mandibular angle osteotomy (MAO) using an intraoral approach is a common procedure for correcting square facial contours in the Asian population. While previous retrospective studies have primarily focused on complications rates, limited research has examined time-related trends and the epidemiological characteristics of the surgical population. A comprehensive study with a large sample size and long-term follow-up is crucial to enhance outcomes, minimize complications, provide evidence-based insights, and consolidate clinical experience.

Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 3,501 MAO cases performed via an intraoral approach between January 2008 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into three cohorts based on admission dates: group A (January 2008 to December 2012), group B (January 2013 to December 2017), and group C (January 2018 to December 2022). Demographic data, complication rates, and patient-reported satisfaction scores were analyzed across the groups.

Results: The average ages for groups A, B, and C were 27.38 ± 6.94, 27.41 ± 6.42, and 28.57 ± 6.65 years, respectively, with group C patients being significantly older than those in group B (P < 0.001). Gender distribution showed 48 males and 825 females in group A; 93 males and 1,097 females in group B; and 122 males and 1,316 females in group C, with significant difference between groups A and B (P = 0.039). Complication rates were 13.05% (114 cases) in group A, 5.54% (66 cases) in group B, and 2.50% (36 cases) in group C. Postoperative satisfaction scores for groups A, B, and C were 3.32 ± 0.64, 3.86 ± 0.54, and 4.42 ± 0.58, respectively, with significant improvements across groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The demand for MAO has steadily increased, particularly among individuals aged 21 to 40, with a predominance of female patients. Expanding indications have led to more cases involving middle-aged, elderly, and male patients. Advancements in surgical techniques have contributed to better aesthetic outcomes and lower complication rates. The use of modified osteotomy procedures and digital technologies has enabled safer, more precise surgeries across diverse populations, resulting in significant improvements in lower facial contours.

Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信