{"title":"Mandibular Angle Osteotomy via Intraoral Approach: A 15-Year Experience from a Single Plastic Surgery Center in China.","authors":"Zhiyang Xie, Shunchao Yan, Chongxu Qiao, Zai Shi, Jingyi Xu, Kaili Yan, Yuming Qu, Shu Wang, Wensong Shangguan, Guoping Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04765-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mandibular angle osteotomy (MAO) using an intraoral approach is a common procedure for correcting square facial contours in the Asian population. While previous retrospective studies have primarily focused on complications rates, limited research has examined time-related trends and the epidemiological characteristics of the surgical population. A comprehensive study with a large sample size and long-term follow-up is crucial to enhance outcomes, minimize complications, provide evidence-based insights, and consolidate clinical experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study reviewed 3,501 MAO cases performed via an intraoral approach between January 2008 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into three cohorts based on admission dates: group A (January 2008 to December 2012), group B (January 2013 to December 2017), and group C (January 2018 to December 2022). Demographic data, complication rates, and patient-reported satisfaction scores were analyzed across the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average ages for groups A, B, and C were 27.38 ± 6.94, 27.41 ± 6.42, and 28.57 ± 6.65 years, respectively, with group C patients being significantly older than those in group B (P < 0.001). Gender distribution showed 48 males and 825 females in group A; 93 males and 1,097 females in group B; and 122 males and 1,316 females in group C, with significant difference between groups A and B (P = 0.039). Complication rates were 13.05% (114 cases) in group A, 5.54% (66 cases) in group B, and 2.50% (36 cases) in group C. Postoperative satisfaction scores for groups A, B, and C were 3.32 ± 0.64, 3.86 ± 0.54, and 4.42 ± 0.58, respectively, with significant improvements across groups (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The demand for MAO has steadily increased, particularly among individuals aged 21 to 40, with a predominance of female patients. Expanding indications have led to more cases involving middle-aged, elderly, and male patients. Advancements in surgical techniques have contributed to better aesthetic outcomes and lower complication rates. The use of modified osteotomy procedures and digital technologies has enabled safer, more precise surgeries across diverse populations, resulting in significant improvements in lower facial contours.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04765-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Mandibular angle osteotomy (MAO) using an intraoral approach is a common procedure for correcting square facial contours in the Asian population. While previous retrospective studies have primarily focused on complications rates, limited research has examined time-related trends and the epidemiological characteristics of the surgical population. A comprehensive study with a large sample size and long-term follow-up is crucial to enhance outcomes, minimize complications, provide evidence-based insights, and consolidate clinical experience.
Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 3,501 MAO cases performed via an intraoral approach between January 2008 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into three cohorts based on admission dates: group A (January 2008 to December 2012), group B (January 2013 to December 2017), and group C (January 2018 to December 2022). Demographic data, complication rates, and patient-reported satisfaction scores were analyzed across the groups.
Results: The average ages for groups A, B, and C were 27.38 ± 6.94, 27.41 ± 6.42, and 28.57 ± 6.65 years, respectively, with group C patients being significantly older than those in group B (P < 0.001). Gender distribution showed 48 males and 825 females in group A; 93 males and 1,097 females in group B; and 122 males and 1,316 females in group C, with significant difference between groups A and B (P = 0.039). Complication rates were 13.05% (114 cases) in group A, 5.54% (66 cases) in group B, and 2.50% (36 cases) in group C. Postoperative satisfaction scores for groups A, B, and C were 3.32 ± 0.64, 3.86 ± 0.54, and 4.42 ± 0.58, respectively, with significant improvements across groups (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: The demand for MAO has steadily increased, particularly among individuals aged 21 to 40, with a predominance of female patients. Expanding indications have led to more cases involving middle-aged, elderly, and male patients. Advancements in surgical techniques have contributed to better aesthetic outcomes and lower complication rates. The use of modified osteotomy procedures and digital technologies has enabled safer, more precise surgeries across diverse populations, resulting in significant improvements in lower facial contours.
Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP).
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.