Patient Navigators Improve In-Office Eye Exam Adherence After Community Eye Screenings in a Randomized Clinical Trial: NYC-SIGHT Study

IF 4.1 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
LISA A. HARK , PRAKASH GORROOCHURN , LAURA T. PIZZI , ERIC JUTKOWITZ , ANNETTE M. GOULAK , STEFANIA C. MARURI , NOGA HARIZMAN , JASON D. HOROWITZ , LISA PARK , QING WANG , DANIEL F. DIAMOND , IVES A. VALENZUELA , DESIREE R. TORRES , YUJIA WANG , TARUN SHARMA , JEFFREY M. LIEBMANN , GEORGE A. CIOFFI
{"title":"Patient Navigators Improve In-Office Eye Exam Adherence After Community Eye Screenings in a Randomized Clinical Trial: NYC-SIGHT Study","authors":"LISA A. HARK ,&nbsp;PRAKASH GORROOCHURN ,&nbsp;LAURA T. PIZZI ,&nbsp;ERIC JUTKOWITZ ,&nbsp;ANNETTE M. GOULAK ,&nbsp;STEFANIA C. MARURI ,&nbsp;NOGA HARIZMAN ,&nbsp;JASON D. HOROWITZ ,&nbsp;LISA PARK ,&nbsp;QING WANG ,&nbsp;DANIEL F. DIAMOND ,&nbsp;IVES A. VALENZUELA ,&nbsp;DESIREE R. TORRES ,&nbsp;YUJIA WANG ,&nbsp;TARUN SHARMA ,&nbsp;JEFFREY M. LIEBMANN ,&nbsp;GEORGE A. CIOFFI","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.02.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess the effectiveness and cost of patient navigators in improving adherence to an initial in-office eye exam following community-based eye health screenings and referral to ophthalmology among underserved populations.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>5-year prospective, cluster-randomized clinical trial.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Eligible individuals aged 40 years and older were recruited from affordable housing developments and senior centers in Upper Manhattan.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Demographics, social determinants of health, clinical characteristics, and access to eye care were collected. Eye health screenings included visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and fundus photography. Those diagnosed with glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, retinal abnormalities, cataracts, or other ocular conditions were referred for in-office eye exams, with initial appointments scheduled by study staff. Navigator Intervention participants received appointment scheduling support for 10 months, Usual Care participants did not receive navigator assistance. T tests, chi-square tests and multivariate stepwise logistic regression analyzed factors associated with adherence. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside the study.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Adherence to the initial in-office eye exam for those referred to ophthalmology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 468 referred participants, 47% (n = 220/468) attended the initial in-office eye exam. Adherence rates: Navigator Intervention (51.8%) versus Usual Care (38.1%). Of those who attended the in-office eye exam, mean age: 70.2 ± 11.3 years; 65.5% female; 46.8% African American, 47.3% Hispanic. Participants in the Navigator Intervention group had higher odds of adhering to the initial in-office eye exam compared to those receiving Usual Care (OR = 1.529; 95% CI (1.023, 2.285)). Participants who spoke English as their primary language also had higher odds of adhering to the initial eye exam (OR = 1.815; 95% CI (1.211, 2721)). Cost per participant in the Navigator Intervention group who attended the in-office eye exam: $24.25 vs. $33.03 per Usual Care participant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patient navigators improved adherence to in-office eye exams following community-based eye health screenings and referral to ophthalmology among an underserved population. The Navigator Intervention resulted in cost savings with an incremental cost-effectiveness difference of $8.78 less per participant randomized to the Navigator Intervention group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"274 ","pages":"Pages 54-66"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425000984","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the effectiveness and cost of patient navigators in improving adherence to an initial in-office eye exam following community-based eye health screenings and referral to ophthalmology among underserved populations.

Design

5-year prospective, cluster-randomized clinical trial.

Participants

Eligible individuals aged 40 years and older were recruited from affordable housing developments and senior centers in Upper Manhattan.

Methods

Demographics, social determinants of health, clinical characteristics, and access to eye care were collected. Eye health screenings included visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and fundus photography. Those diagnosed with glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, retinal abnormalities, cataracts, or other ocular conditions were referred for in-office eye exams, with initial appointments scheduled by study staff. Navigator Intervention participants received appointment scheduling support for 10 months, Usual Care participants did not receive navigator assistance. T tests, chi-square tests and multivariate stepwise logistic regression analyzed factors associated with adherence. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside the study.

Main Outcome Measures

Adherence to the initial in-office eye exam for those referred to ophthalmology.

Results

Of 468 referred participants, 47% (n = 220/468) attended the initial in-office eye exam. Adherence rates: Navigator Intervention (51.8%) versus Usual Care (38.1%). Of those who attended the in-office eye exam, mean age: 70.2 ± 11.3 years; 65.5% female; 46.8% African American, 47.3% Hispanic. Participants in the Navigator Intervention group had higher odds of adhering to the initial in-office eye exam compared to those receiving Usual Care (OR = 1.529; 95% CI (1.023, 2.285)). Participants who spoke English as their primary language also had higher odds of adhering to the initial eye exam (OR = 1.815; 95% CI (1.211, 2721)). Cost per participant in the Navigator Intervention group who attended the in-office eye exam: $24.25 vs. $33.03 per Usual Care participant.

Conclusions

Patient navigators improved adherence to in-office eye exams following community-based eye health screenings and referral to ophthalmology among an underserved population. The Navigator Intervention resulted in cost savings with an incremental cost-effectiveness difference of $8.78 less per participant randomized to the Navigator Intervention group.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信