Antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations can be imputed from phenotypic data using a random forest approach.

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
American journal of veterinary research Pub Date : 2025-02-27 Print Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.2460/ajvr.24.10.0314
Gayatri Anil, Joshua Glass, Abdolreza Mosaddegh, Casey L Cazer
{"title":"Antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations can be imputed from phenotypic data using a random forest approach.","authors":"Gayatri Anil, Joshua Glass, Abdolreza Mosaddegh, Casey L Cazer","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.10.0314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a public health threat requiring monitoring across multiple sectors because AMR genes and pathogens can pass between humans, animals, and the environment. Idiosyncrasies in AMR data, including missing data and changes in testing protocols, make characterizing AMR trends over time and sectors challenging. Therefore, this study applied machine learning methods to impute missing minimum inhibitory concentrations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Models were built using cattle-associated Escherichia coli from the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System. Random forest models were designed to predict the minimum inhibitory concentration of a given E coli isolate for 10 antimicrobials. Predictors included isolate metadata and the minimum inhibitory concentrations of other antimicrobials. Model performance was evaluated on held-out test data and 2 external datasets (E coli isolated from chickens and humans).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the accuracy within 1 minimum inhibitory concentration category was over 80% for all 10 antimicrobials and over 90% for 5 antimicrobials on test data. Six of the models performed as well on both external datasets as on test data, whereas the remaining 4 had similar accuracy on the human dataset but lower on the chicken data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results indicate that the models can predict minimum inhibitory concentration values at a level of accuracy that would be helpful for imputation in resistance datasets.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The imputation of missing minimum inhibitory concentrations would allow for better evaluation of AMR trends over time, helping inform stewardship policies. These models may also help streamline surveillance and clinical susceptibility testing because they suggest which antimicrobials need to be laboratory-tested and which can be extrapolated by modeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"S70-S79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.10.0314","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a public health threat requiring monitoring across multiple sectors because AMR genes and pathogens can pass between humans, animals, and the environment. Idiosyncrasies in AMR data, including missing data and changes in testing protocols, make characterizing AMR trends over time and sectors challenging. Therefore, this study applied machine learning methods to impute missing minimum inhibitory concentrations.

Methods: Models were built using cattle-associated Escherichia coli from the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System. Random forest models were designed to predict the minimum inhibitory concentration of a given E coli isolate for 10 antimicrobials. Predictors included isolate metadata and the minimum inhibitory concentrations of other antimicrobials. Model performance was evaluated on held-out test data and 2 external datasets (E coli isolated from chickens and humans).

Results: Overall, the accuracy within 1 minimum inhibitory concentration category was over 80% for all 10 antimicrobials and over 90% for 5 antimicrobials on test data. Six of the models performed as well on both external datasets as on test data, whereas the remaining 4 had similar accuracy on the human dataset but lower on the chicken data.

Conclusions: These results indicate that the models can predict minimum inhibitory concentration values at a level of accuracy that would be helpful for imputation in resistance datasets.

Clinical relevance: The imputation of missing minimum inhibitory concentrations would allow for better evaluation of AMR trends over time, helping inform stewardship policies. These models may also help streamline surveillance and clinical susceptibility testing because they suggest which antimicrobials need to be laboratory-tested and which can be extrapolated by modeling.

抗菌剂最小抑菌浓度可通过随机森林方法从表型数据中推算出来。
目的:抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是一种公共卫生威胁,需要在多个部门进行监测,因为AMR基因和病原体可以在人类、动物和环境之间传播。AMR数据的特殊性,包括数据缺失和测试协议的变化,使得描述AMR随时间和行业的趋势具有挑战性。因此,本研究应用机器学习方法来计算缺失的最小抑制浓度。方法:利用国家抗微生物药物耐药性监测系统的牛相关大肠杆菌建立模型。设计随机森林模型来预测给定大肠杆菌分离物对10种抗菌素的最低抑菌浓度。预测因子包括分离物元数据和其他抗菌素的最低抑制浓度。模型的性能是通过测试数据和2个外部数据集(从鸡和人身上分离的大肠杆菌)来评估的。结果:总体而言,在测试数据上,10种抗菌素在1个最低抑菌浓度类别内的准确性均超过80%,5种抗菌素在90%以上。其中6个模型在外部数据集和测试数据上的表现一样好,而其余4个模型在人类数据集上的准确性相似,但在鸡数据上的准确性较低。结论:这些结果表明,这些模型可以准确地预测最小抑制浓度值,这将有助于在耐药性数据集中进行输入。临床相关性:缺失最低抑制浓度的归因将允许更好地评估AMR随时间的趋势,有助于为管理政策提供信息。这些模型还可能有助于简化监测和临床敏感性测试,因为它们表明哪些抗菌素需要实验室测试,哪些可以通过建模推断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信