Sustainability and Techno-Economic Assessment of Batch and Flow Chemistry in Seven Industrial Pharmaceutical Processes.

IF 7.3 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-14 eCollection Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c09289
Mert Can Ince, Brahim Benyahia, Gianvito Vilé
{"title":"Sustainability and Techno-Economic Assessment of Batch and Flow Chemistry in Seven Industrial Pharmaceutical Processes.","authors":"Mert Can Ince, Brahim Benyahia, Gianvito Vilé","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c09289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) is commonly perceived as more efficient when performed using continuous-flow methods, whereas batch processes are often seen as less favorable due to their limitations in yield, heat and mass transfer, and safety. This perception largely stems from existing studies that focus on green metrics such as the E-factor and yield. However, a comprehensive comparison of batch and flow processes through full techno-economic analyses (TEA) and life-cycle assessments (LCA) remains underexplored, leaving key aspects of their environmental and economic impacts inadequately assessed. This work addresses this gap by presenting a detailed comparison of batch and flow syntheses of seven industrially relevant APIs, including amitriptyline hydrochloride, tamoxifen, zolpidem, rufinamide, artesunate, ibuprofen, and phenibut. Eleven environmental impact categories within the framework of nine planetary boundaries were assessed, and the study also included an evaluation of capital and operating costs for both production methods. The results demonstrated that, on average, continuous-flow processes are significantly more sustainable with improvements in energy efficiency, water consumption, and waste reduction. Flow processes also show a marked reduction in carbon emissions and up to a 97% reduction in energy consumption, highlighting their potential for greener API manufacturing. Despite these advantages, the study identified areas where the continuous-flow technology requires further development. Specifically, manufacturing certain APIs in flow show lower-than-average improvements in operating expenditure and land system changes, the latter being directly correlated with the consumption of organic solvents, that can be comparable to or even higher than in batch. These challenges highlight the need for further optimization of flow processes to fully realize their potential in API production.</p>","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":"13 7","pages":"2864-2874"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c09289","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) is commonly perceived as more efficient when performed using continuous-flow methods, whereas batch processes are often seen as less favorable due to their limitations in yield, heat and mass transfer, and safety. This perception largely stems from existing studies that focus on green metrics such as the E-factor and yield. However, a comprehensive comparison of batch and flow processes through full techno-economic analyses (TEA) and life-cycle assessments (LCA) remains underexplored, leaving key aspects of their environmental and economic impacts inadequately assessed. This work addresses this gap by presenting a detailed comparison of batch and flow syntheses of seven industrially relevant APIs, including amitriptyline hydrochloride, tamoxifen, zolpidem, rufinamide, artesunate, ibuprofen, and phenibut. Eleven environmental impact categories within the framework of nine planetary boundaries were assessed, and the study also included an evaluation of capital and operating costs for both production methods. The results demonstrated that, on average, continuous-flow processes are significantly more sustainable with improvements in energy efficiency, water consumption, and waste reduction. Flow processes also show a marked reduction in carbon emissions and up to a 97% reduction in energy consumption, highlighting their potential for greener API manufacturing. Despite these advantages, the study identified areas where the continuous-flow technology requires further development. Specifically, manufacturing certain APIs in flow show lower-than-average improvements in operating expenditure and land system changes, the latter being directly correlated with the consumption of organic solvents, that can be comparable to or even higher than in batch. These challenges highlight the need for further optimization of flow processes to fully realize their potential in API production.

七种工业制药工艺中间歇和流动化学的可持续性和技术经济评价。
人们通常认为,采用连续流动方法合成活性药物成分 (API) 的效率更高,而间歇工艺由于在产量、传热和传质以及安全性方面的局限性,通常被认为不太有利。这种看法主要源于现有的研究,这些研究侧重于 E 因子和产量等绿色指标。然而,通过完整的技术经济分析(TEA)和生命周期评估(LCA)对间歇式和流动式工艺进行全面比较的研究仍然不足,导致对其环境和经济影响的关键方面评估不足。本研究针对这一空白,详细比较了七种工业相关原料药的批次合成和流程合成,包括盐酸阿米替林、他莫昔芬、唑吡坦、芦非那胺、青蒿琥酯、布洛芬和菲尼布特。对九个地球边界框架内的十一个环境影响类别进行了评估,研究还包括对两种生产方法的资本和运营成本进行评估。研究结果表明,平均而言,连续流工艺在能源效率、水消耗和废物减少方面都有明显改善,因而更具可持续性。连续流工艺还能显著减少碳排放,能耗最多可降低 97%,突出了其在绿色原料药生产方面的潜力。尽管具有这些优势,但研究发现了连续流技术需要进一步发展的领域。具体来说,以流动方式生产某些原料药在运营支出和土地系统变化方面的改进低于平均水平,后者与有机溶剂的消耗直接相关,可能与间歇式生产相当甚至更高。这些挑战凸显了进一步优化流动工艺的必要性,以充分发挥其在原料药生产中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1470
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment. The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信