Electron exchange capacity of dissolved natural organic matter: further method development and interpretation using square wave voltammetry in dimethyl sulfoxide†

IF 4.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Jeffrey M. Hudson, Han Cao, Wenqing Xu and Paul G. Tratnyek
{"title":"Electron exchange capacity of dissolved natural organic matter: further method development and interpretation using square wave voltammetry in dimethyl sulfoxide†","authors":"Jeffrey M. Hudson, Han Cao, Wenqing Xu and Paul G. Tratnyek","doi":"10.1039/D4EM00555D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Most measurements of the electron exchange capacity (EEC) of natural organic matter (NOM) have been done in water using mediated chronoamperometry (MCA), which gives precise results that are believed to be representative of the samples' current redox condition, but the broader significance of these EECs is less clear. In a recent study, we described a novel but complementary electrochemical approach to quantify EECs of 10 pyrogenic dissolved organic matter (pyDOM) and 6 standard/reference natural organic matter (NOM) materials without mediation using square-wave voltammetry (SWV) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Comparison of the results obtained by MCA and SWV showed that SWV in DMSO gave larger EECs than MCA, by several-fold for NOM and 1–2 orders of magnitude for pyDOM. In this study, we describe an improved protocol for calibration of the SWV/DMSO method, which largely eliminates the difference in EECs from SWV and MCA for the standard/reference NOM samples. The results show that values obtained <em>via</em> the SWV method depend on the specific redox standards used for calibration (<em>i.e.</em>, calibrant model compounds), with slopes that span 1.5 orders of magnitude due to variations in current response factors. For pyDOM, the higher values of EEC obtained by SWV were further verified and rationalized. Like the calibrant model compounds, it is proposed that the relatively large EECs for some pyDOM samples from high-temperature chars reflect a combination of hydrodynamic influences in our electrochemical cell, primarily related to electrode surface area to volume ratio and pyDOM size. A detailed explanation of the calibration method, choice of working electrode, DOM sorption effects, and cosolvent effects are discussed. The results obtained with this method suggest that the capacity of NOM for donating, accepting, and storing elections is an operationally defined property, the significance of which will depend on application, <em>e.g.</em>, to carbon, metal, or nutrient cycling, pollutant attenuation, <em>etc.</em></p>","PeriodicalId":74,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts","volume":" 4","pages":" 917-935"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/em/d4em00555d","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most measurements of the electron exchange capacity (EEC) of natural organic matter (NOM) have been done in water using mediated chronoamperometry (MCA), which gives precise results that are believed to be representative of the samples' current redox condition, but the broader significance of these EECs is less clear. In a recent study, we described a novel but complementary electrochemical approach to quantify EECs of 10 pyrogenic dissolved organic matter (pyDOM) and 6 standard/reference natural organic matter (NOM) materials without mediation using square-wave voltammetry (SWV) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Comparison of the results obtained by MCA and SWV showed that SWV in DMSO gave larger EECs than MCA, by several-fold for NOM and 1–2 orders of magnitude for pyDOM. In this study, we describe an improved protocol for calibration of the SWV/DMSO method, which largely eliminates the difference in EECs from SWV and MCA for the standard/reference NOM samples. The results show that values obtained via the SWV method depend on the specific redox standards used for calibration (i.e., calibrant model compounds), with slopes that span 1.5 orders of magnitude due to variations in current response factors. For pyDOM, the higher values of EEC obtained by SWV were further verified and rationalized. Like the calibrant model compounds, it is proposed that the relatively large EECs for some pyDOM samples from high-temperature chars reflect a combination of hydrodynamic influences in our electrochemical cell, primarily related to electrode surface area to volume ratio and pyDOM size. A detailed explanation of the calibration method, choice of working electrode, DOM sorption effects, and cosolvent effects are discussed. The results obtained with this method suggest that the capacity of NOM for donating, accepting, and storing elections is an operationally defined property, the significance of which will depend on application, e.g., to carbon, metal, or nutrient cycling, pollutant attenuation, etc.

溶解天然有机物的电子交换能力:二甲亚砜中方波伏安法的进一步发展和解释。
天然有机物质(NOM)的电子交换容量(EEC)的大多数测量都是使用介导的计时电流法(MCA)在水中完成的,它给出了精确的结果,被认为是样品当前氧化还原条件的代表,但这些EEC的更广泛意义尚不清楚。在最近的研究中,我们描述了一种新颖但互补的电化学方法,可以在二甲亚砜(DMSO)中使用方波伏安法(SWV)来量化10种热原溶解有机物(pyDOM)和6种标准/参考天然有机物(NOM)材料的eec,而无需中介。MCA和SWV的比较结果表明,DMSO中SWV的EECs比MCA大,NOM的EECs是MCA的几倍,pyDOM的EECs是MCA的1-2个数量级。在本研究中,我们描述了一种改进的SWV/DMSO方法校准方案,该方案在很大程度上消除了标准/参考NOM样品中SWV和MCA的EECs差异。结果表明,通过SWV方法获得的值取决于用于校准的特定氧化还原标准(即校准模型化合物),由于电流响应因子的变化,斜率跨越1.5个数量级。对于pyDOM, SWV获得的较高EEC值得到了进一步的验证和合理化。与校正模型化合物一样,我们提出高温炭中一些pyDOM样品的相对较大的EECs反映了电化学电池中流体动力学影响的组合,主要与电极表面积与体积比和pyDOM尺寸有关。详细说明了校准方法、工作电极的选择、DOM吸附效应和共溶剂效应。用这种方法获得的结果表明,NOM捐赠、接受和储存选举的能力是一种可操作定义的属性,其意义取决于应用,例如碳、金属或养分循环、污染物衰减等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
202
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts publishes high quality papers in all areas of the environmental chemical sciences, including chemistry of the air, water, soil and sediment. We welcome studies on the environmental fate and effects of anthropogenic and naturally occurring contaminants, both chemical and microbiological, as well as related natural element cycling processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信