Enhanced Heat Recovery From Electric Arc Furnaces: Optimization and Comparative Analysis of Steam and Organic Rankine Cycles

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Mahdi Mehrpour, Ehsan Houshfar, Mehdi Ashjaee
{"title":"Enhanced Heat Recovery From Electric Arc Furnaces: Optimization and Comparative Analysis of Steam and Organic Rankine Cycles","authors":"Mahdi Mehrpour,&nbsp;Ehsan Houshfar,&nbsp;Mehdi Ashjaee","doi":"10.1155/er/6689904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>In this study, two distinct approaches were proposed for recovering heat from the exhaust gases of electric arc furnaces (EAFs)—the steam cycle and the organic Rankine cycle (ORC). These methods were evaluated based on various criteria, including energy and exergy efficiency, economic feasibility, and environmental impacts. To identify optimal performance parameters, the effects of different working fluids in the ORC were examined, revealing significant variations in cycle behavior depending on the fluid used. Consequently, the most effective operational conditions for each specific fluid were identified and recorded based on temperature and pressure fluctuations. The analysis led to the selection of acetone as the optimal working fluid due to its favorable performance despite its high flammability, characterized by its isentropic nature. The energy and exergy efficiencies of the cycle using this fluid reached 21% and 61%, respectively, with a power output of 597.4 kW under maximum conditions. Additionally, the study demonstrated that, given the high temperature of the heat source, the steam cycle is more justifiable than the combined steam and ORC with the proposed configuration. The exergy efficiency of the steam cycle reached a maximum of 57%, with a net power output of 2897 kW and a total cost rate of $0.041/s under these conditions. Finally, by optimizing the steam cycle using a genetic algorithm, the ideal values for exergy efficiency were slightly reduced to 53%, with a significant decrease in the total cost rate to $0.036/s.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Research","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/er/6689904","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/er/6689904","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, two distinct approaches were proposed for recovering heat from the exhaust gases of electric arc furnaces (EAFs)—the steam cycle and the organic Rankine cycle (ORC). These methods were evaluated based on various criteria, including energy and exergy efficiency, economic feasibility, and environmental impacts. To identify optimal performance parameters, the effects of different working fluids in the ORC were examined, revealing significant variations in cycle behavior depending on the fluid used. Consequently, the most effective operational conditions for each specific fluid were identified and recorded based on temperature and pressure fluctuations. The analysis led to the selection of acetone as the optimal working fluid due to its favorable performance despite its high flammability, characterized by its isentropic nature. The energy and exergy efficiencies of the cycle using this fluid reached 21% and 61%, respectively, with a power output of 597.4 kW under maximum conditions. Additionally, the study demonstrated that, given the high temperature of the heat source, the steam cycle is more justifiable than the combined steam and ORC with the proposed configuration. The exergy efficiency of the steam cycle reached a maximum of 57%, with a net power output of 2897 kW and a total cost rate of $0.041/s under these conditions. Finally, by optimizing the steam cycle using a genetic algorithm, the ideal values for exergy efficiency were slightly reduced to 53%, with a significant decrease in the total cost rate to $0.036/s.

Abstract Image

本研究提出了从电弧炉(EAF)废气中回收热量的两种不同方法--蒸汽循环和有机朗肯循环(ORC)。根据各种标准对这些方法进行了评估,包括能源和放能效率、经济可行性和环境影响。为了确定最佳性能参数,对 ORC 中不同工作流体的影响进行了研究,结果表明,所使用的流体不同,循环行为也有很大差异。因此,根据温度和压力波动,确定并记录了每种特定流体最有效的运行条件。分析结果表明,尽管丙酮具有较高的可燃性,但由于其等熵特性,性能良好,因此被选为最佳工作流体。使用这种液体的循环的能量效率和放能效率分别达到 21% 和 61%,在最大条件下输出功率为 597.4 千瓦。此外,研究还表明,考虑到热源的温度较高,采用蒸汽循环比采用建议配置的蒸汽和 ORC 组合循环更合理。在这些条件下,蒸汽循环的能效最高可达 57%,净输出功率为 2897 千瓦,总成本率为 0.041 美元/秒。最后,通过使用遗传算法对蒸汽循环进行优化,放能效率的理想值略微降低到 53%,总成本率显著降低到 0.036 美元/秒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Energy Research
International Journal of Energy Research 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1170
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Energy Research (IJER) is dedicated to providing a multidisciplinary, unique platform for researchers, scientists, engineers, technology developers, planners, and policy makers to present their research results and findings in a compelling manner on novel energy systems and applications. IJER covers the entire spectrum of energy from production to conversion, conservation, management, systems, technologies, etc. We encourage papers submissions aiming at better efficiency, cost improvements, more effective resource use, improved design and analysis, reduced environmental impact, and hence leading to better sustainability. IJER is concerned with the development and exploitation of both advanced traditional and new energy sources, systems, technologies and applications. Interdisciplinary subjects in the area of novel energy systems and applications are also encouraged. High-quality research papers are solicited in, but are not limited to, the following areas with innovative and novel contents: -Biofuels and alternatives -Carbon capturing and storage technologies -Clean coal technologies -Energy conversion, conservation and management -Energy storage -Energy systems -Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation -Hydrogen energy and fuel cells -Hydrogen production technologies -Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies -Nuclear energy -Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass) -Smart energy system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信