Species distribution, antibiotic susceptibility and clinical characteristics in Enterococcal bacteremia; experience from South India

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Dr Vettakkara Niyas, Dr Rajalakshmi Ananthanarayanan, Dr Febeena Hussain
{"title":"Species distribution, antibiotic susceptibility and clinical characteristics in Enterococcal bacteremia; experience from South India","authors":"Dr Vettakkara Niyas,&nbsp;Dr Rajalakshmi Ananthanarayanan,&nbsp;Dr Febeena Hussain","doi":"10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>While the incidence of Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) infections in India remains lower than in other countries, recent reports indicate an upward trend. This study investigates the clinical characteristics and antibiotic susceptibility profile associated with Enterococcus bacteremia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient records with Enterococcal bacteremia from January 2016 to December 2022 at our tertiary care center in Kerala, South India. For the detection of bacterial growth, BacT/AlLERT 3D instrument was used. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility were done by the VITEK-2 system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the study period, we identified 214 unique Enterococcus isolates in blood cultures. The median age of patients was 62 years (interquartile range: 51-71 years), with males constituting 66% of the cases. The most prevalent comorbidity was diabetes, affecting 51% of patients (n=109), followed by chronic kidney disease in 27% (n=58), and chronic liver disease in 22% (n=48). Malignancies were present in 16% of patients (n=34), and 17% (n=36) experienced immunosuppression from either disease or medication. The primary sources of infection were genitourinary (17%, n=36) and intestinal (16%, n=35) tracts, with infective endocarditis (IE) observed in 7% (n=15).</div><div>E. faecalis was the predominant species, accounting for 50% of cases (n=107), followed by E. faecium at 39.5% (n=85). Other species included E. gallinarum (n=6), E. raffinose (n=4), E. durans (n=2), E. avium (n=2), and E. casseliflavus (n=1). Species identification was indeterminate in 6 isolates.</div><div>Among the E. faecalis isolates, 100% susceptibility was noted for vancomycin and linezolid, 95% for teicoplanin, 88% for penicillin, 86% for ampicillin, and 61% for gentamicin. For E. faecium, susceptibility rates were 95% for vancomycin and linezolid, 88% for teicoplanin, 36% for gentamicin, and only 11% for penicillin and ampicillin. Daptomycin was tested in 28 isolates, with 1 being resistant and 2 showing intermediate susceptibility. Among the 2 isolates that exhibited vancomycin and linezolid resistance, daptomycin remained susceptible.</div><div>Overall, 59% of patients improved, 30% expired, and 11% were discharged at their request and could not be followed up. Among the 95 patients with E. faecalis bacteremia, 67% survived, while among the 76 patients with E. faecium bacteremia, 64% survived. There was no statistically significant correlation between comorbidities, infection source, species, and clinical outcomes. Among those diagnosed with vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus, almost one-third (29%) succumbed. Among the 4 patients diagnosed with VRE, 3 did not survive.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Enterococcal bacteremia is associated with significant mortality, with approximately one-third of patients succumbing to the illness. However, vancomycin resistance remains relatively low even in Enterococcus faecium isolates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14006,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 107403"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971224004788","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

While the incidence of Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) infections in India remains lower than in other countries, recent reports indicate an upward trend. This study investigates the clinical characteristics and antibiotic susceptibility profile associated with Enterococcus bacteremia.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient records with Enterococcal bacteremia from January 2016 to December 2022 at our tertiary care center in Kerala, South India. For the detection of bacterial growth, BacT/AlLERT 3D instrument was used. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility were done by the VITEK-2 system.

Results

During the study period, we identified 214 unique Enterococcus isolates in blood cultures. The median age of patients was 62 years (interquartile range: 51-71 years), with males constituting 66% of the cases. The most prevalent comorbidity was diabetes, affecting 51% of patients (n=109), followed by chronic kidney disease in 27% (n=58), and chronic liver disease in 22% (n=48). Malignancies were present in 16% of patients (n=34), and 17% (n=36) experienced immunosuppression from either disease or medication. The primary sources of infection were genitourinary (17%, n=36) and intestinal (16%, n=35) tracts, with infective endocarditis (IE) observed in 7% (n=15).
E. faecalis was the predominant species, accounting for 50% of cases (n=107), followed by E. faecium at 39.5% (n=85). Other species included E. gallinarum (n=6), E. raffinose (n=4), E. durans (n=2), E. avium (n=2), and E. casseliflavus (n=1). Species identification was indeterminate in 6 isolates.
Among the E. faecalis isolates, 100% susceptibility was noted for vancomycin and linezolid, 95% for teicoplanin, 88% for penicillin, 86% for ampicillin, and 61% for gentamicin. For E. faecium, susceptibility rates were 95% for vancomycin and linezolid, 88% for teicoplanin, 36% for gentamicin, and only 11% for penicillin and ampicillin. Daptomycin was tested in 28 isolates, with 1 being resistant and 2 showing intermediate susceptibility. Among the 2 isolates that exhibited vancomycin and linezolid resistance, daptomycin remained susceptible.
Overall, 59% of patients improved, 30% expired, and 11% were discharged at their request and could not be followed up. Among the 95 patients with E. faecalis bacteremia, 67% survived, while among the 76 patients with E. faecium bacteremia, 64% survived. There was no statistically significant correlation between comorbidities, infection source, species, and clinical outcomes. Among those diagnosed with vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus, almost one-third (29%) succumbed. Among the 4 patients diagnosed with VRE, 3 did not survive.

Conclusion

Enterococcal bacteremia is associated with significant mortality, with approximately one-third of patients succumbing to the illness. However, vancomycin resistance remains relatively low even in Enterococcus faecium isolates.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
1020
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Infectious Diseases (IJID) Publisher: International Society for Infectious Diseases Publication Frequency: Monthly Type: Peer-reviewed, Open Access Scope: Publishes original clinical and laboratory-based research. Reports clinical trials, reviews, and some case reports. Focuses on epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and control of infectious diseases. Emphasizes diseases common in under-resourced countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信