Shawqi Mohammed Farea, Mehmet Emin Mumcuoglu, Mustafa Unel
{"title":"An Explainable AI approach for detecting failures in air pressure systems","authors":"Shawqi Mohammed Farea, Mehmet Emin Mumcuoglu, Mustafa Unel","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Air Pressure System (APS) plays a crucial role in heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs), supplying pressurized air to essential subsystems such as braking and suspension. APS failures normally lead to vehicles being stranded on the road with associated safety and financial risks. Although detecting these failures is essential to prevent such events, the detection trustworthiness is equally important given the high sensitivity of this issue. This paper addresses the problem of APS failure detection using Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM), a highly intelligible and interpretable glass-box model. A dataset of operational driving data from 110 healthy vehicles, without any APS failures, and 30 faulty vehicles, with detected APS failures, was collected. First, essential preprocessing steps were developed to deal with the hierarchical big data and to extract indicative features. The main objective of EBM is to distinguish faulty vehicles from healthy ones based on those features while providing explanations for its decisions. The model succeeded in detecting most of the faulty vehicles with a small proportion of false alarms (roughly 5%); the overall accuracy was 91.4% and the F1 score was 0.80. In addition, the provided explanations were thoroughly investigated to evaluate the validity and trustworthiness of the model decisions. At the same time, the explanations themselves were assessed based on domain knowledge to prove their efficacy and relevance. When compared with a human expert analysis, these explanations highly align with the experts’ knowledge of the APS problem. The proposed methodology is easily adaptable for other time-series predictive maintenance applications across different fields.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11677,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Failure Analysis","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 109441"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630725001827","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Air Pressure System (APS) plays a crucial role in heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs), supplying pressurized air to essential subsystems such as braking and suspension. APS failures normally lead to vehicles being stranded on the road with associated safety and financial risks. Although detecting these failures is essential to prevent such events, the detection trustworthiness is equally important given the high sensitivity of this issue. This paper addresses the problem of APS failure detection using Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM), a highly intelligible and interpretable glass-box model. A dataset of operational driving data from 110 healthy vehicles, without any APS failures, and 30 faulty vehicles, with detected APS failures, was collected. First, essential preprocessing steps were developed to deal with the hierarchical big data and to extract indicative features. The main objective of EBM is to distinguish faulty vehicles from healthy ones based on those features while providing explanations for its decisions. The model succeeded in detecting most of the faulty vehicles with a small proportion of false alarms (roughly 5%); the overall accuracy was 91.4% and the F1 score was 0.80. In addition, the provided explanations were thoroughly investigated to evaluate the validity and trustworthiness of the model decisions. At the same time, the explanations themselves were assessed based on domain knowledge to prove their efficacy and relevance. When compared with a human expert analysis, these explanations highly align with the experts’ knowledge of the APS problem. The proposed methodology is easily adaptable for other time-series predictive maintenance applications across different fields.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Failure Analysis publishes research papers describing the analysis of engineering failures and related studies.
Papers relating to the structure, properties and behaviour of engineering materials are encouraged, particularly those which also involve the detailed application of materials parameters to problems in engineering structures, components and design. In addition to the area of materials engineering, the interacting fields of mechanical, manufacturing, aeronautical, civil, chemical, corrosion and design engineering are considered relevant. Activity should be directed at analysing engineering failures and carrying out research to help reduce the incidences of failures and to extend the operating horizons of engineering materials.
Emphasis is placed on the mechanical properties of materials and their behaviour when influenced by structure, process and environment. Metallic, polymeric, ceramic and natural materials are all included and the application of these materials to real engineering situations should be emphasised. The use of a case-study based approach is also encouraged.
Engineering Failure Analysis provides essential reference material and critical feedback into the design process thereby contributing to the prevention of engineering failures in the future. All submissions will be subject to peer review from leading experts in the field.