Testing preference of alfalfa hay of different relative feed value and brome hay in lactating Jersey cows

K.K. Buse, P.J. Kononoff
{"title":"Testing preference of alfalfa hay of different relative feed value and brome hay in lactating Jersey cows","authors":"K.K. Buse,&nbsp;P.J. Kononoff","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forages comprise a large portion of dairy cattle rations, and quality can have a large influence on feed intake and milk production. Although factors like particle size, fiber content, and digestibility affect it, palatability can also play a role in feed intake. The objective of this study was to conduct an experiment to evaluate the effect of relative feed value (RFV) on feed preference. A taste preference sequential elimination experiment using 16 lactating Jersey cows (210 ± 4 DIM, 27.4 ± 3.24 kg/d milk yield, 19.6 ± 1.52 kg/d DMI; ± SD) was conducted to test this objective. Reduced-lignin alfalfa hay diets with a high RFV (213; HIRFV), mid RFV (163; MDRFV), and low RFV (94; LORFV) were compared with a control smooth brome grass hay (75 RFV; Brome). Cows were offered 0.45 kg of each alfalfa treatment and 0.23 kg of the hay treatment in a randomized arrangement within the feed bunk for 1 h or until the feed was fully consumed or consumed in the greatest amount. Feeds were offered for 9 d with all treatments offered the first 4 d. The most preferred feed was then removed, and the remaining 3 feeds were offered for 3 d. The process was repeated for the last 2 d. Feed preference was ranked from 1 to 4 with 1 being the most preferred and 4 the least; this was in the order they were removed. The rankings of each treatment for each cow were summed and averaged. The probability of a treatment being chosen first was determined using the Plackett-Luce model. The preference ranking of HIRFV was highest (1.06 ± 0.25), followed by LORFV (2.56 ± 0.63), MDRFV (2.75 ± 0.58), and Brome (3.25 ± 0.93). The probability of HIRFV being selected first is 95.7% ± 0.79%, whereas the probabilities of LORFV, MDRFV, and Brome being selected first are 2.09% ± 0.38%, 1.70% ± 0.38%, and 0.55% ± 0.46%, respectively. These results support the notion that higher quality alfalfa hay is preferred by cows. The secondary preference of LORFV could be associated with the presence of byproducts of Maillard reactions, which would lower the RFV while providing more favorable flavors than were present in MDRFV and Brome.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"6 2","pages":"Pages 223-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224001650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forages comprise a large portion of dairy cattle rations, and quality can have a large influence on feed intake and milk production. Although factors like particle size, fiber content, and digestibility affect it, palatability can also play a role in feed intake. The objective of this study was to conduct an experiment to evaluate the effect of relative feed value (RFV) on feed preference. A taste preference sequential elimination experiment using 16 lactating Jersey cows (210 ± 4 DIM, 27.4 ± 3.24 kg/d milk yield, 19.6 ± 1.52 kg/d DMI; ± SD) was conducted to test this objective. Reduced-lignin alfalfa hay diets with a high RFV (213; HIRFV), mid RFV (163; MDRFV), and low RFV (94; LORFV) were compared with a control smooth brome grass hay (75 RFV; Brome). Cows were offered 0.45 kg of each alfalfa treatment and 0.23 kg of the hay treatment in a randomized arrangement within the feed bunk for 1 h or until the feed was fully consumed or consumed in the greatest amount. Feeds were offered for 9 d with all treatments offered the first 4 d. The most preferred feed was then removed, and the remaining 3 feeds were offered for 3 d. The process was repeated for the last 2 d. Feed preference was ranked from 1 to 4 with 1 being the most preferred and 4 the least; this was in the order they were removed. The rankings of each treatment for each cow were summed and averaged. The probability of a treatment being chosen first was determined using the Plackett-Luce model. The preference ranking of HIRFV was highest (1.06 ± 0.25), followed by LORFV (2.56 ± 0.63), MDRFV (2.75 ± 0.58), and Brome (3.25 ± 0.93). The probability of HIRFV being selected first is 95.7% ± 0.79%, whereas the probabilities of LORFV, MDRFV, and Brome being selected first are 2.09% ± 0.38%, 1.70% ± 0.38%, and 0.55% ± 0.46%, respectively. These results support the notion that higher quality alfalfa hay is preferred by cows. The secondary preference of LORFV could be associated with the presence of byproducts of Maillard reactions, which would lower the RFV while providing more favorable flavors than were present in MDRFV and Brome.
泌乳泽西奶牛对不同相对饲料价值苜蓿干草和溴化干草的偏好试验
饲料占奶牛口粮的很大一部分,饲料质量对采食量和产奶量有很大影响。虽然颗粒大小、纤维含量和消化率等因素会影响其,但适口性也会在采食量中发挥作用。本试验旨在研究相对饲料价值(RFV)对饲料偏好的影响。选取16头泌乳泽西奶牛(210±4 DIM、27.4±3.24 kg/d产奶量、19.6±1.52 kg/d DMI)进行味觉偏好序贯消除试验;±SD)来检验这一目标。高RFV的还原性木质素苜蓿干草饲粮(213;HIRFV),中期RFV (163;MDRFV)和低RFV (94;对照光滑雀麦干草(75 RFV;布罗姆)。在饲料舱内随机安排饲喂苜蓿处理0.45 kg,干草处理0.23 kg,饲喂1 h或直至饲料消耗殆尽或消耗最多。饲喂9 d,所有处理均饲喂前4 d。然后去除最喜欢的饲料,其余3种饲料饲喂3 d。最后2 d重复该过程。饲料偏好从1到4排序,1为最喜欢的饲料,4为最不喜欢的饲料;这是他们被移走的顺序。对每头奶牛各处理的排名进行求和和平均。使用Plackett-Luce模型确定首先选择治疗方法的概率。HIRFV的偏好等级最高(1.06±0.25),其次是LORFV(2.56±0.63)、MDRFV(2.75±0.58)和Brome(3.25±0.93)。HIRFV被优先选择的概率为95.7%±0.79%,而LORFV、MDRFV和Brome被优先选择的概率分别为2.09%±0.38%、1.70%±0.38%和0.55%±0.46%。这些结果支持了奶牛更喜欢高质量的苜蓿干草的观点。LORFV的次要偏好可能与美拉德反应副产物的存在有关,这将降低RFV,同时提供比MDRFV和Brome更有利的风味。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信