Integrating circuit theory and network modeling to identify ecosystem carbon sequestration service flow networks

IF 5.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Chen Qu , Jia Xu , Wen Li , Yucen Zhai , Yiting Wang , Baozhu Liu , Shaoning Yan
{"title":"Integrating circuit theory and network modeling to identify ecosystem carbon sequestration service flow networks","authors":"Chen Qu ,&nbsp;Jia Xu ,&nbsp;Wen Li ,&nbsp;Yucen Zhai ,&nbsp;Yiting Wang ,&nbsp;Baozhu Liu ,&nbsp;Shaoning Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Current methods for mapping ecosystem service flows often fail to accurately capture the diverse biogeographical environments associated with these service flows when visualizing the structural features of ecosystem service flow networks. Taking the provinces of Liaoning, Jilin, and Heilongjiang in China as examples, we combined circuit theory and network model approaches to map ecosystem carbon sequestration service flow networks. We examined how network structure influences differences in the supply and demand for carbon sequestration services. Combining circuit theory and network models can be used to effectively map the flow of carbon sequestration services in ecosystems, showcasing its ability to represent these processes. From 2000 to 2020, the disparity between the supply and demand of carbon sequestration services has consistently grown, accompanied by a growing spatial imbalance in the distribution of supply and demand areas. The supply sources of carbon sequestration services have significantly declined while the demand sources have steadily increased. The length of the carbon flow corridors decreased sharply before stabilizing. There has been a continuous increase in the number of deficit nodes and disrupted edges within carbon sequestration service flow networks. The response of carbon sequestration services to landscape patterns and network topology indicators showed a nonlinear relationship, exhibiting a threshold effect. The findings have provided strategic insights for allocating and managing carbon resources at the regional level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51024,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Informatics","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 103077"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S157495412500086X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current methods for mapping ecosystem service flows often fail to accurately capture the diverse biogeographical environments associated with these service flows when visualizing the structural features of ecosystem service flow networks. Taking the provinces of Liaoning, Jilin, and Heilongjiang in China as examples, we combined circuit theory and network model approaches to map ecosystem carbon sequestration service flow networks. We examined how network structure influences differences in the supply and demand for carbon sequestration services. Combining circuit theory and network models can be used to effectively map the flow of carbon sequestration services in ecosystems, showcasing its ability to represent these processes. From 2000 to 2020, the disparity between the supply and demand of carbon sequestration services has consistently grown, accompanied by a growing spatial imbalance in the distribution of supply and demand areas. The supply sources of carbon sequestration services have significantly declined while the demand sources have steadily increased. The length of the carbon flow corridors decreased sharply before stabilizing. There has been a continuous increase in the number of deficit nodes and disrupted edges within carbon sequestration service flow networks. The response of carbon sequestration services to landscape patterns and network topology indicators showed a nonlinear relationship, exhibiting a threshold effect. The findings have provided strategic insights for allocating and managing carbon resources at the regional level.
整合电路理论和网络建模,识别生态系统固碳服务流网络
当前绘制生态系统服务流的方法在可视化生态系统服务流网络的结构特征时,往往不能准确地捕捉与这些服务流相关的多样性生物地理环境。以辽宁、吉林、黑龙江三省为例,将电路理论与网络模型方法相结合,绘制了生态系统固碳服务流网络。我们研究了网络结构如何影响碳固存服务的供需差异。结合电路理论和网络模型可以有效地绘制生态系统中碳固存服务的流动图,展示其代表这些过程的能力。2000 - 2020年,固碳服务的供需差距持续扩大,供需区域分布的空间不平衡加剧。固碳服务的供应来源明显减少,而需求来源稳步增加。碳流廊道长度急剧减少,而后趋于稳定。在碳封存服务流网络中,赤字节点和中断边缘的数量不断增加。固碳服务对景观格局和网络拓扑指标的响应呈非线性关系,表现出阈值效应。这些发现为在区域一级分配和管理碳资源提供了战略见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Informatics
Ecological Informatics 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
346
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ecological Informatics is devoted to the publication of high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of computational ecology, data science and biogeography. The scope of the journal takes into account the data-intensive nature of ecology, the growing capacity of information technology to access, harness and leverage complex data as well as the critical need for informing sustainable management in view of global environmental and climate change. The nature of the journal is interdisciplinary at the crossover between ecology and informatics. It focuses on novel concepts and techniques for image- and genome-based monitoring and interpretation, sensor- and multimedia-based data acquisition, internet-based data archiving and sharing, data assimilation, modelling and prediction of ecological data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信