About the assessment of the degree of oxidation of cellulose during periodate reaction: Comparison of different characterization techniques and their discrepancies

IF 2.4 3区 化学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Lorette Brault , Nathalie Marlin , Gérard Mortha , Jérémy Boucher , Dominique Lachenal
{"title":"About the assessment of the degree of oxidation of cellulose during periodate reaction: Comparison of different characterization techniques and their discrepancies","authors":"Lorette Brault ,&nbsp;Nathalie Marlin ,&nbsp;Gérard Mortha ,&nbsp;Jérémy Boucher ,&nbsp;Dominique Lachenal","doi":"10.1016/j.carres.2025.109438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study focuses on the side reactions responsible for the low efficiency of the periodate-chlorite oxidation sequence of cellulose. Discrepancies are systematically observed between different commonly-used characterization methods for assessing the degree of oxidation (DO) of cellulose. Indeed, the different titration methods of the aldehyde groups found in the dialdehyde cellulose (DAC) generated by the Malaprade reaction on cellulose, do not generally fit the titration of the carboxyl groups found in the dicarboxycellulose (DCC), generated after chlorite oxidation of the DAC. Possible side reactions affecting the Malaprade and chlorite reactions, or affecting the accuracy of the titrations, are presented here and discussed. Studying periodate consumption, iodate generation, organic acids release during the reactions, fiber mass yield, sodium hydroxide consumption during the β-alkoxy-elimination reaction of DAC, <sup>13</sup>C NMR spectra of DAC and DCC, and carboxyl titration of DCC, allowed to conclude that chlorite did not fully oxidize the aldehyde groups in the DAC, but only about one aldehyde out of two. It was found that the non-oxidized aldehydes in the DAC were hindered by hemiacetal-type linkages. This study refutes several well-established hypotheses from the literature when applied to reactions under mild conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9415,"journal":{"name":"Carbohydrate Research","volume":"552 ","pages":"Article 109438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbohydrate Research","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008621525000643","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on the side reactions responsible for the low efficiency of the periodate-chlorite oxidation sequence of cellulose. Discrepancies are systematically observed between different commonly-used characterization methods for assessing the degree of oxidation (DO) of cellulose. Indeed, the different titration methods of the aldehyde groups found in the dialdehyde cellulose (DAC) generated by the Malaprade reaction on cellulose, do not generally fit the titration of the carboxyl groups found in the dicarboxycellulose (DCC), generated after chlorite oxidation of the DAC. Possible side reactions affecting the Malaprade and chlorite reactions, or affecting the accuracy of the titrations, are presented here and discussed. Studying periodate consumption, iodate generation, organic acids release during the reactions, fiber mass yield, sodium hydroxide consumption during the β-alkoxy-elimination reaction of DAC, 13C NMR spectra of DAC and DCC, and carboxyl titration of DCC, allowed to conclude that chlorite did not fully oxidize the aldehyde groups in the DAC, but only about one aldehyde out of two. It was found that the non-oxidized aldehydes in the DAC were hindered by hemiacetal-type linkages. This study refutes several well-established hypotheses from the literature when applied to reactions under mild conditions.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Carbohydrate Research
Carbohydrate Research 化学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
183
审稿时长
3.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Carbohydrate Research publishes reports of original research in the following areas of carbohydrate science: action of enzymes, analytical chemistry, biochemistry (biosynthesis, degradation, structural and functional biochemistry, conformation, molecular recognition, enzyme mechanisms, carbohydrate-processing enzymes, including glycosidases and glycosyltransferases), chemical synthesis, isolation of natural products, physicochemical studies, reactions and their mechanisms, the study of structures and stereochemistry, and technological aspects. Papers on polysaccharides should have a "molecular" component; that is a paper on new or modified polysaccharides should include structural information and characterization in addition to the usual studies of rheological properties and the like. A paper on a new, naturally occurring polysaccharide should include structural information, defining monosaccharide components and linkage sequence. Papers devoted wholly or partly to X-ray crystallographic studies, or to computational aspects (molecular mechanics or molecular orbital calculations, simulations via molecular dynamics), will be considered if they meet certain criteria. For computational papers the requirements are that the methods used be specified in sufficient detail to permit replication of the results, and that the conclusions be shown to have relevance to experimental observations - the authors'' own data or data from the literature. Specific directions for the presentation of X-ray data are given below under Results and "discussion".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信