15. Surgical management of ovarian dermoid cysts in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nicole Smith , Justin Lim , Carolyn Ziegler , Lisa Allen , Andrea Simpson , Sari Kives
{"title":"15. Surgical management of ovarian dermoid cysts in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Nicole Smith ,&nbsp;Justin Lim ,&nbsp;Carolyn Ziegler ,&nbsp;Lisa Allen ,&nbsp;Andrea Simpson ,&nbsp;Sari Kives","doi":"10.1016/j.jpag.2025.01.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ovarian dermoid cysts are benign germ-cell tumors commonly found in pediatric and adolescent patients. Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy has become the preferred surgical approach over laparotomy due to its benefits of shorter hospital stay, reduced post-operative pain, and quicker recovery. However, there remains concern for higher rates of cyst rupture (and possible peritonitis) and future dermoid cyst recurrence, when compared to laparotomy. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the existing evidence on these surgical methods to assess whether the shift to laparoscopy has led to these unintended outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search in five academic medical databases was conducted with an information specialist, using keywords and MeSH terms for ovarian dermoid cysts, laparotomy, laparoscopy, or minimally invasive surgery in children, from database inception to August 29, 2024. This study was exempt from Research Ethics Board (REB) approval. Randomized, quasi-randomized trials, and prospective/retrospective cohort studies were eligible. Two independent authors reviewed titles/abstracts, full texts, and extracted data, resolving conflicts with a third author as required. Risk of bias was assessed with appropriate tools. A meta-analysis using risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals was performed with a Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed by I², with I2 &gt; 50% interpreted as high degree of heterogeneity requiring random-effects modelling.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1021 title/abstracts were reviewed, with six studies eligible for inclusion (2000 – 2022; Canada, United States, Poland). In total, 492 (58%) patients underwent laparoscopy and 353 (42%) underwent laparotomy. For meta-analysis, five studies were included for cyst rupture and four studies were included for dermoid cyst recurrence. Random-effect meta-analysis (I2=58%) showed a significantly higher risk of cyst rupture with laparoscopy (RR = 2.47, 95% CI 1.40-4.37). Four studies reported on peritonitis, with no cases observed. Fixed-effect meta-analysis (I2 =5%) found no significant difference in dermoid cyst recurrence between laparoscopy and laparotomy (RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.41-2.08).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Laparoscopy remains the preferred approach for the surgical management of ovarian dermoid cysts in children. Despite a higher risk of intraoperative cyst rupture, our systematic review highlights that</div><div>subsequent post-operative peritonitis was not clinically observed. Further, dermoid cyst recurrence rates remained similar between laparoscopy and laparotomy, further encouraging the use of laparoscopy when possible. Limitations of our systematic review include the limited number of included studies, all of which were observational studies with small sample sizes, and the presence of unaccounted confounders such as cyst size, patient age and BMI, and varying indications for surgical management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16708,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology","volume":"38 2","pages":"Pages 228-229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1083318825000488","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Ovarian dermoid cysts are benign germ-cell tumors commonly found in pediatric and adolescent patients. Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy has become the preferred surgical approach over laparotomy due to its benefits of shorter hospital stay, reduced post-operative pain, and quicker recovery. However, there remains concern for higher rates of cyst rupture (and possible peritonitis) and future dermoid cyst recurrence, when compared to laparotomy. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the existing evidence on these surgical methods to assess whether the shift to laparoscopy has led to these unintended outcomes.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search in five academic medical databases was conducted with an information specialist, using keywords and MeSH terms for ovarian dermoid cysts, laparotomy, laparoscopy, or minimally invasive surgery in children, from database inception to August 29, 2024. This study was exempt from Research Ethics Board (REB) approval. Randomized, quasi-randomized trials, and prospective/retrospective cohort studies were eligible. Two independent authors reviewed titles/abstracts, full texts, and extracted data, resolving conflicts with a third author as required. Risk of bias was assessed with appropriate tools. A meta-analysis using risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals was performed with a Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed by I², with I2 > 50% interpreted as high degree of heterogeneity requiring random-effects modelling.

Results

1021 title/abstracts were reviewed, with six studies eligible for inclusion (2000 – 2022; Canada, United States, Poland). In total, 492 (58%) patients underwent laparoscopy and 353 (42%) underwent laparotomy. For meta-analysis, five studies were included for cyst rupture and four studies were included for dermoid cyst recurrence. Random-effect meta-analysis (I2=58%) showed a significantly higher risk of cyst rupture with laparoscopy (RR = 2.47, 95% CI 1.40-4.37). Four studies reported on peritonitis, with no cases observed. Fixed-effect meta-analysis (I2 =5%) found no significant difference in dermoid cyst recurrence between laparoscopy and laparotomy (RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.41-2.08).

Conclusions

Laparoscopy remains the preferred approach for the surgical management of ovarian dermoid cysts in children. Despite a higher risk of intraoperative cyst rupture, our systematic review highlights that
subsequent post-operative peritonitis was not clinically observed. Further, dermoid cyst recurrence rates remained similar between laparoscopy and laparotomy, further encouraging the use of laparoscopy when possible. Limitations of our systematic review include the limited number of included studies, all of which were observational studies with small sample sizes, and the presence of unaccounted confounders such as cyst size, patient age and BMI, and varying indications for surgical management.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
251
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology includes all aspects of clinical and basic science research in pediatric and adolescent gynecology. The Journal draws on expertise from a variety of disciplines including pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, reproduction and gynecology, reproductive and pediatric endocrinology, genetics, and molecular biology. The Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology features original studies, review articles, book and literature reviews, letters to the editor, and communications in brief. It is an essential resource for the libraries of OB/GYN specialists, as well as pediatricians and primary care physicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信