The placebo effect in the treatment of children with epilepsy: A systematic review

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Enduena Begolli , Camille Højer Winther , Maria J Miranda , Nanette Mol Debes
{"title":"The placebo effect in the treatment of children with epilepsy: A systematic review","authors":"Enduena Begolli ,&nbsp;Camille Højer Winther ,&nbsp;Maria J Miranda ,&nbsp;Nanette Mol Debes","doi":"10.1016/j.seizure.2025.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate the placebo effect in the treatment of children and adolescents with epilepsy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review of studies comparing anti-seizure medication (ASM) to placebo in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Eligible studies were identified through the database PubMed following PRISMA guidelines resulting in the identification of 1173 articles. Screening and inclusion were assessed by two independent reviewers and 17 studies met inclusion criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventeen studies involving children and adolescents with epilepsy were included in this review. Compared to levetiracetam (LEV) and perampanel (PER), the placebo did not show a significant reduction in seizures. However, compared to pregabalin (PGB) the placebo was significant in reducing seizures at lower doses. Results for eslicarbazepine (ESL) were contradictory. Placebo-treated patients generally had lower Child Behavior checklist (CBCL) problem scores than those on LEV, which was associated with higher Total Problem Scores and worse Aggressive Behavior scores. Adverse event (AE) rates in the placebo groups varied widely, from 14 % to 91.8 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This systematic review examined the effect of placebo treatment compared to ASMs in childhood epilepsy across 17 studies. The effectiveness of placebos was not significant compared to LEV and PER. However, there was a significant placebo effect compared to PGB, which was higher compared to low PGB doses than compared to high PGB doses. AE rates varied widely. Assessing long-term cognitive and behavioral outcomes was challenging due to short study durations and potential biases. Future research could play a critical role in preventing AEs in children undergoing ASM treatment by providing a deeper understanding of the placebo effect associated with these medications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49552,"journal":{"name":"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy","volume":"127 ","pages":"Pages 7-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059131125000524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the placebo effect in the treatment of children and adolescents with epilepsy.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of studies comparing anti-seizure medication (ASM) to placebo in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Eligible studies were identified through the database PubMed following PRISMA guidelines resulting in the identification of 1173 articles. Screening and inclusion were assessed by two independent reviewers and 17 studies met inclusion criteria.

Results

Seventeen studies involving children and adolescents with epilepsy were included in this review. Compared to levetiracetam (LEV) and perampanel (PER), the placebo did not show a significant reduction in seizures. However, compared to pregabalin (PGB) the placebo was significant in reducing seizures at lower doses. Results for eslicarbazepine (ESL) were contradictory. Placebo-treated patients generally had lower Child Behavior checklist (CBCL) problem scores than those on LEV, which was associated with higher Total Problem Scores and worse Aggressive Behavior scores. Adverse event (AE) rates in the placebo groups varied widely, from 14 % to 91.8 %.

Conclusion

This systematic review examined the effect of placebo treatment compared to ASMs in childhood epilepsy across 17 studies. The effectiveness of placebos was not significant compared to LEV and PER. However, there was a significant placebo effect compared to PGB, which was higher compared to low PGB doses than compared to high PGB doses. AE rates varied widely. Assessing long-term cognitive and behavioral outcomes was challenging due to short study durations and potential biases. Future research could play a critical role in preventing AEs in children undergoing ASM treatment by providing a deeper understanding of the placebo effect associated with these medications.
治疗儿童癫痫的安慰剂效应:系统回顾
目的探讨安慰剂治疗儿童及青少年癫痫的疗效。方法:我们对儿童和青少年癫痫患者的抗癫痫药物(ASM)与安慰剂的比较研究进行了系统回顾。根据PRISMA指南通过PubMed数据库确定了符合条件的研究,最终确定了1173篇文章。筛选和纳入由两名独立评论者评估,17项研究符合纳入标准。结果本综述纳入了17项涉及儿童和青少年癫痫的研究。与左乙拉西坦(LEV)和perampanel (PER)相比,安慰剂没有显示癫痫发作的显著减少。然而,与普瑞巴林(PGB)相比,低剂量安慰剂在减少癫痫发作方面具有显著性。埃斯卡巴西平(ESL)的结果是矛盾的。安慰剂组患者的儿童行为检查表(CBCL)问题得分普遍低于LEV组,总问题得分较高,攻击行为得分较差。安慰剂组的不良事件发生率差别很大,从14%到91.8%不等。结论:本系统综述考察了17项研究中安慰剂治疗与asm治疗在儿童癫痫中的效果。与LEV和PER相比,安慰剂的有效性不显著。然而,与PGB相比,安慰剂效应显著,与低剂量PGB相比,安慰剂效应高于高剂量PGB。AE的比率差别很大。由于研究时间短和潜在的偏差,评估长期的认知和行为结果具有挑战性。未来的研究可以通过更深入地了解与这些药物相关的安慰剂效应,在预防接受ASM治疗的儿童发生ae方面发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy
Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
231
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Seizure - European Journal of Epilepsy is an international journal owned by Epilepsy Action (the largest member led epilepsy organisation in the UK). It provides a forum for papers on all topics related to epilepsy and seizure disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信