Prediction models for intrapartum fetal hypoxia: A systematic review

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Holly J. Giles-Clark , Sasha M. Skinner , May M. Linn , Daniel L. Rolnik , Ben W. Mol
{"title":"Prediction models for intrapartum fetal hypoxia: A systematic review","authors":"Holly J. Giles-Clark ,&nbsp;Sasha M. Skinner ,&nbsp;May M. Linn ,&nbsp;Daniel L. Rolnik ,&nbsp;Ben W. Mol","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intrapartum fetal hypoxia (IFH) occurs infrequently and many cases occur unexpectedly, highlighting the importance of identifying at-risk fetuses to prevent hypoxic injury during birth.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This systematic review aims to evaluate existing prediction models for IFH and ascertain the predictor variables that were incorporated into most models.</div></div><div><h3>Search strategy</h3><div>We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to December 2023 for synonyms of fetal distress, operative birth and neonatal asphyxia, with a filter for prediction models.</div></div><div><h3>Selection criteria</h3><div>Prediction models for IFH were included. IFH was defined as evidence of hypoxia or operative intervention for suspected fetal distress.</div></div><div><h3>Data collection and analysis</h3><div>Two authors independently extracted information on study design, outcome definition and validation. We evaluated study quality using the PROBAST tool. The number of models in which each predictor variable significantly contributed to the risk of IFH was quantified.</div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>From 874 articles, 23 publications reported on 41 eligible prediction models. 32 models reported on model development only, while seven models across three studies included both development and internal validation. Of these, two models were also externally validated and refit to the validation data, but investigated fetuses with antenatally-suspected growth restriction, limiting generalisability. Frequently reported predictor variables included parity (13 studies), cerebroplacental ratio (10 studies) and oxytocin use (6 studies).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>No prediction models for IFH applicable to the general population are currently ready for clinical application. External validation of existing models or development of new, reliable models applicable to all pregnant women is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 99-111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211525001216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intrapartum fetal hypoxia (IFH) occurs infrequently and many cases occur unexpectedly, highlighting the importance of identifying at-risk fetuses to prevent hypoxic injury during birth.

Objectives

This systematic review aims to evaluate existing prediction models for IFH and ascertain the predictor variables that were incorporated into most models.

Search strategy

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to December 2023 for synonyms of fetal distress, operative birth and neonatal asphyxia, with a filter for prediction models.

Selection criteria

Prediction models for IFH were included. IFH was defined as evidence of hypoxia or operative intervention for suspected fetal distress.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently extracted information on study design, outcome definition and validation. We evaluated study quality using the PROBAST tool. The number of models in which each predictor variable significantly contributed to the risk of IFH was quantified.

Main results

From 874 articles, 23 publications reported on 41 eligible prediction models. 32 models reported on model development only, while seven models across three studies included both development and internal validation. Of these, two models were also externally validated and refit to the validation data, but investigated fetuses with antenatally-suspected growth restriction, limiting generalisability. Frequently reported predictor variables included parity (13 studies), cerebroplacental ratio (10 studies) and oxytocin use (6 studies).

Conclusions

No prediction models for IFH applicable to the general population are currently ready for clinical application. External validation of existing models or development of new, reliable models applicable to all pregnant women is needed.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信