Measuring cerebrovascular reactivity in a hemodialysis cohort

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Claire Seigworth , Isabelle Grassl , Dawn F. Wolfgram
{"title":"Measuring cerebrovascular reactivity in a hemodialysis cohort","authors":"Claire Seigworth ,&nbsp;Isabelle Grassl ,&nbsp;Dawn F. Wolfgram","doi":"10.1016/j.cccb.2025.100380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Introduction Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) can inform about cerebral vascular health and provide prognostic information on risk cerebral ischemic injury. Use of transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) is a non-invasive and inexpensive method to measure CVR and often uses a stimulus of increase in arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO<sub>2</sub>). We evaluate re-breathing and breath-hold to measure CVR in a medically complex hemodialysis cohort who are at risk for cerebral hypoperfusion due to circulatory stress of hemodialysis.</div><div>Methods CVR was measured using both a 30 s breath-hold and a re-breathing period. We used percent change in mean flow velocity of the middle cerebral artery, measured with TCD over the change in end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> to calculate CVR. Paired T-test was used to compare the parameters of CVR and Pearson correlation to evaluate relevant risk factors for lower CVR.</div><div>Results 16 participants completed both CVR measurements, with mean (SD) age of 64.2 (11.2) years. CVR measured from each technique was similar 3.4 (2.9) %/mmHg (breath-hold) vs 2.7 (1.6) %/mmHg, (re-breathing) <em>p</em> = 0.37. Older age and history of stroke were associated with lower CVR when measured with re-breathing but not with breath-hold technique.</div><div>Conclusions <em>Re</em>-breathing to increase pCO<sub>2</sub> and measure CVR is well-tolerated by a frail older medically complex patient population and may be a way to measure cerebrovascular health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72549,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100380"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666245025000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) can inform about cerebral vascular health and provide prognostic information on risk cerebral ischemic injury. Use of transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) is a non-invasive and inexpensive method to measure CVR and often uses a stimulus of increase in arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2). We evaluate re-breathing and breath-hold to measure CVR in a medically complex hemodialysis cohort who are at risk for cerebral hypoperfusion due to circulatory stress of hemodialysis.
Methods CVR was measured using both a 30 s breath-hold and a re-breathing period. We used percent change in mean flow velocity of the middle cerebral artery, measured with TCD over the change in end-tidal CO2 to calculate CVR. Paired T-test was used to compare the parameters of CVR and Pearson correlation to evaluate relevant risk factors for lower CVR.
Results 16 participants completed both CVR measurements, with mean (SD) age of 64.2 (11.2) years. CVR measured from each technique was similar 3.4 (2.9) %/mmHg (breath-hold) vs 2.7 (1.6) %/mmHg, (re-breathing) p = 0.37. Older age and history of stroke were associated with lower CVR when measured with re-breathing but not with breath-hold technique.
Conclusions Re-breathing to increase pCO2 and measure CVR is well-tolerated by a frail older medically complex patient population and may be a way to measure cerebrovascular health.
测量血液透析队列中的脑血管反应性
脑血管反应性(CVR)可以反映脑血管健康状况,并提供脑缺血损伤风险的预后信息。使用经颅多普勒超声(TCD)是一种无创且廉价的测量CVR的方法,通常使用刺激动脉二氧化碳分压(pCO2)的增加。我们在一个医学上复杂的血液透析队列中评估再呼吸和屏气来测量CVR,这些患者由于血液透析的循环应激而有脑灌注不足的风险。方法采用30 s屏气和再呼吸两种方法测量CVR。我们用TCD测量的大脑中动脉平均流速变化百分比除以潮末CO2变化来计算CVR。采用配对t检验比较CVR参数和Pearson相关性,评价降低CVR的相关危险因素。结果16名参与者完成了两项CVR测量,平均(SD)年龄为64.2(11.2)岁。每种技术测量的CVR相似,3.4 (2.9)%/mmHg(屏气)vs 2.7 (1.6) %/mmHg(再呼吸)p = 0.37。当用再呼吸法测量CVR时,年龄较大和卒中史与较低的CVR相关,但与屏气法无关。结论再呼吸增加pCO2和测量CVR在体弱多病的老年复杂患者群体中具有良好的耐受性,可能是一种测量脑血管健康的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior
Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior Neurology, Clinical Neurology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信