Experimental study on pedestrian movement on elevated platforms

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Xuehua Song , Jun Zhang , Jianlin Li , Hang Yu , Xintong Li , Weiguo Song , K.M. Liew
{"title":"Experimental study on pedestrian movement on elevated platforms","authors":"Xuehua Song ,&nbsp;Jun Zhang ,&nbsp;Jianlin Li ,&nbsp;Hang Yu ,&nbsp;Xintong Li ,&nbsp;Weiguo Song ,&nbsp;K.M. Liew","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Comprehending pedestrian movement behavior on platforms is crucial for enhancing the safety of railway tunnels, particularly during emergencies. This study performed a series of pedestrian walking and running experiments on a 0.6 m high platform. By analyzing the movement capability and spatial distribution characteristics, the potential influences and differences of crowd movement under unprotected and restricted boundaries were explored. The results reveal that both the motion modes and boundary types influence the behavior mechanism of pedestrians. Compared to the restricted boundary condition, it is found that the impact of unprotected boundary on pedestrian movement is primarily reflected in increased speed for walking (7 % faster) and increase of headway distance (about 25 %) for running. Pedestrians moving on the unprotected side exhibit smaller boundary distances than those on the restricted side but show greater heterogeneity in their distribution. The nearest neighbor distribution indicates that a higher acceptance of front neighbors among pedestrians near boundaries. Those running near the unprotected side need a larger movement comfort radius to accommodate their motion. This study provides empirical data to address the gap in the field, which can serve as a basis for modeling and enable the accurate simulation of pedestrian flows on platforms, thereby facilitating the development of more reasonable crowd guidance measures and ultimately enhancing tunnel evacuation safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 106836"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092575352500061X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehending pedestrian movement behavior on platforms is crucial for enhancing the safety of railway tunnels, particularly during emergencies. This study performed a series of pedestrian walking and running experiments on a 0.6 m high platform. By analyzing the movement capability and spatial distribution characteristics, the potential influences and differences of crowd movement under unprotected and restricted boundaries were explored. The results reveal that both the motion modes and boundary types influence the behavior mechanism of pedestrians. Compared to the restricted boundary condition, it is found that the impact of unprotected boundary on pedestrian movement is primarily reflected in increased speed for walking (7 % faster) and increase of headway distance (about 25 %) for running. Pedestrians moving on the unprotected side exhibit smaller boundary distances than those on the restricted side but show greater heterogeneity in their distribution. The nearest neighbor distribution indicates that a higher acceptance of front neighbors among pedestrians near boundaries. Those running near the unprotected side need a larger movement comfort radius to accommodate their motion. This study provides empirical data to address the gap in the field, which can serve as a basis for modeling and enable the accurate simulation of pedestrian flows on platforms, thereby facilitating the development of more reasonable crowd guidance measures and ultimately enhancing tunnel evacuation safety.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信