{"title":"Neighbourhood socioeconomic disparities in active travel and car dependency in Australian urban settings","authors":"Takemi Sugiyama , Nyssa Hadgraft , Takumi Abe , Nick Petrunoff , Neville Owen , Manoj Chandrabose","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.105845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transportation can be relevant to socioeconomic inequalities in health since engaging in different modes of daily travel has health implications. Studies of area-level socioeconomic variations in active travel (walking/cycling) have had mixed findings, and little research has investigated variations in car use. Using Australian travel survey data, we examined associations of neighbourhood-level socioeconomic status (SES) with active travel (walked/cycled ≥30 min/d without using cars) and car dependency (car use without walking/cycling). Data from 41,097 adult participants were analysed using multi-level logistic regression. Relative to the highest SES areas, living in the lowest SES areas was associated with lower odds of engaging in active travel, but this association was attenuated after adjusting for neighbourhoods' population density and distance to the nearest city centre. Living in the lowest SES areas was associated with greater odds of car dependency, even after adjusting for these environmental characteristics. Area-level linear regression examining the prevalence of active travel and car dependency in 337 suburbs produced similar results: There was a strong socioeconomic gradient in the prevalence of car dependency, with disadvantaged areas showing a greater prevalence. Transport and planning initiatives should address this unequal distribution of car dependency, which may exacerbate health disparities in cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 105845"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125001453","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Transportation can be relevant to socioeconomic inequalities in health since engaging in different modes of daily travel has health implications. Studies of area-level socioeconomic variations in active travel (walking/cycling) have had mixed findings, and little research has investigated variations in car use. Using Australian travel survey data, we examined associations of neighbourhood-level socioeconomic status (SES) with active travel (walked/cycled ≥30 min/d without using cars) and car dependency (car use without walking/cycling). Data from 41,097 adult participants were analysed using multi-level logistic regression. Relative to the highest SES areas, living in the lowest SES areas was associated with lower odds of engaging in active travel, but this association was attenuated after adjusting for neighbourhoods' population density and distance to the nearest city centre. Living in the lowest SES areas was associated with greater odds of car dependency, even after adjusting for these environmental characteristics. Area-level linear regression examining the prevalence of active travel and car dependency in 337 suburbs produced similar results: There was a strong socioeconomic gradient in the prevalence of car dependency, with disadvantaged areas showing a greater prevalence. Transport and planning initiatives should address this unequal distribution of car dependency, which may exacerbate health disparities in cities.
期刊介绍:
Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.