Numerical investigation of the combined impact of flow channel's geometry and baffle blockage on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells

IF 5.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Niyi Olukayode , Hui Qian , Shenrong Ye , Mingruo Hu , Yanjun Dai , Sheng Sui
{"title":"Numerical investigation of the combined impact of flow channel's geometry and baffle blockage on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells","authors":"Niyi Olukayode ,&nbsp;Hui Qian ,&nbsp;Shenrong Ye ,&nbsp;Mingruo Hu ,&nbsp;Yanjun Dai ,&nbsp;Sheng Sui","doi":"10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2025.126885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the combined effects of flow field cross-sectional shapes and baffle blockage on mass transfer and performance improvement in PEMFCs. Four single-path serpentine channels, square, trapezoidal, triangular, and dovetail, are analysed individually and combined with various designs of rectangular baffles. The effective mass transfer coefficient (<em>EMTC</em>) and the efficient evaluation criterion (<em>EEC</em>) were adopted to evaluate the comprehensive performance of the flow field and baffle designs. Results show that channel width significantly influences mass transfer behaviour, current density, pressure drop, and reactant concentration profiles, while channel depth shows minimal effect. The dovetail channel exhibits superior PEMFC performance, improving current density by 10.47 % over the conventional square channel. Introducing typical, single-hole and multi-hole baffles to the flow field improves mass transfer and enhances fuel cell performance. Typical baffles increase current density by 5.86 %, while single- and multi-hole baffles achieve increments of 6.21 % and 7.61 %, respectively. Although the conventional baffles cause a high pressure drop, adding a central hole reduces the pressure drop while enhancing performance. Finally, the dovetail flow field-baffle arrangement achieves a 14.95 % increase in current density at 0.4 V. In contrast, the triangular flow field-baffle configuration provides the most uniform reactant distribution with minimal pressure drop. This study underscores the crucial role of optimizing flow field geometry and baffle structure to enhance mass transfer and PEMFC performance, highlighting their importance for diverse PEMFC applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":336,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer","volume":"242 ","pages":"Article 126885"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0017931025002261","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the combined effects of flow field cross-sectional shapes and baffle blockage on mass transfer and performance improvement in PEMFCs. Four single-path serpentine channels, square, trapezoidal, triangular, and dovetail, are analysed individually and combined with various designs of rectangular baffles. The effective mass transfer coefficient (EMTC) and the efficient evaluation criterion (EEC) were adopted to evaluate the comprehensive performance of the flow field and baffle designs. Results show that channel width significantly influences mass transfer behaviour, current density, pressure drop, and reactant concentration profiles, while channel depth shows minimal effect. The dovetail channel exhibits superior PEMFC performance, improving current density by 10.47 % over the conventional square channel. Introducing typical, single-hole and multi-hole baffles to the flow field improves mass transfer and enhances fuel cell performance. Typical baffles increase current density by 5.86 %, while single- and multi-hole baffles achieve increments of 6.21 % and 7.61 %, respectively. Although the conventional baffles cause a high pressure drop, adding a central hole reduces the pressure drop while enhancing performance. Finally, the dovetail flow field-baffle arrangement achieves a 14.95 % increase in current density at 0.4 V. In contrast, the triangular flow field-baffle configuration provides the most uniform reactant distribution with minimal pressure drop. This study underscores the crucial role of optimizing flow field geometry and baffle structure to enhance mass transfer and PEMFC performance, highlighting their importance for diverse PEMFC applications.

Abstract Image

流道几何形状和挡板堵塞对质子交换膜燃料电池性能综合影响的数值研究
本研究考察了流场截面形状和挡板堵塞对pemfc传质和性能改善的综合影响。四种单路径蛇形通道,方形、梯形、三角形和燕尾形,分别进行了分析,并结合了各种矩形挡板的设计。采用有效传质系数(EMTC)和效率评价准则(EEC)对流场和挡板设计的综合性能进行了评价。结果表明,通道宽度显著影响传质行为、电流密度、压降和反应物浓度分布,而通道深度影响最小。燕尾通道表现出优异的PEMFC性能,比传统的方形通道提高了10.47%的电流密度。在流场中引入典型的单孔和多孔挡板可以改善传质,提高燃料电池的性能。典型挡流板增加电流密度5.86%,单孔和多孔挡流板分别增加6.21%和7.61%。虽然传统的挡板会造成很大的压降,但增加一个中心孔可以降低压降,同时提高性能。最后,在0.4 V时,燕尾流场挡板的布置使电流密度提高了14.95%。相反,三角形流场挡板结构以最小的压降提供了最均匀的反应物分布。该研究强调了优化流场几何形状和挡板结构对提高传质和PEMFC性能的关键作用,强调了它们在各种PEMFC应用中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
13.50%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer is the vehicle for the exchange of basic ideas in heat and mass transfer between research workers and engineers throughout the world. It focuses on both analytical and experimental research, with an emphasis on contributions which increase the basic understanding of transfer processes and their application to engineering problems. Topics include: -New methods of measuring and/or correlating transport-property data -Energy engineering -Environmental applications of heat and/or mass transfer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信