Soil organic carbon formation in grassland ecosystems: Higher efficiency of roots than shoots and rhizodeposition

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Qinglin Yin, Ying Liu, Jiangfeng Li, Jiaqi Wu, Yifan Wang, Haiyang Zhang, Heyong Liu, Liangchao Jiang, Jiaxin Yang, Yidi Wang, Yong Jiang, Xingguo Han, Jing Wang
{"title":"Soil organic carbon formation in grassland ecosystems: Higher efficiency of roots than shoots and rhizodeposition","authors":"Qinglin Yin,&nbsp;Ying Liu,&nbsp;Jiangfeng Li,&nbsp;Jiaqi Wu,&nbsp;Yifan Wang,&nbsp;Haiyang Zhang,&nbsp;Heyong Liu,&nbsp;Liangchao Jiang,&nbsp;Jiaxin Yang,&nbsp;Yidi Wang,&nbsp;Yong Jiang,&nbsp;Xingguo Han,&nbsp;Jing Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The formation and stability of soil organic carbon (SOC) are crucial for ecosystem carbon sequestration. Plant shoot litter, root litter, and rhizodeposition are the primary plant-derived carbon sources for SOC, and their quantities and proportions are susceptible to global change. However, their relative contributions to the formation and pool size of SOC and its fractions remain uncertain. In this study, we conducted a pot experiment followed by two incubation experiments, using natural <sup>13</sup>C abundance isotope tracing to disentangle the effects of plant rhizodeposition, shoot litter, and root litter on SOC. The results showed that rhizodeposition during plant growth increased SOC stability by enhancing mineral-associated organic carbon and reducing particulate organic carbon, without affecting total SOC in the short term. Neither shoot litter nor root litter impacted SOC during short-term decomposition. Over the entire plant life cycle, the efficiency of plant carbon incorporation into SOC from root litter was 10 and 12 folds of that from shoot litter and rhizodeposition, respectively. Our findings indicate that, although root litter is less abundant than shoot litter, it plays a pivotal role in driving new SOC formation. This should be taken into account when predicting SOC sequestration, particularly given the turnover of roots under global change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"250 ","pages":"Article 106523"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725000777","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The formation and stability of soil organic carbon (SOC) are crucial for ecosystem carbon sequestration. Plant shoot litter, root litter, and rhizodeposition are the primary plant-derived carbon sources for SOC, and their quantities and proportions are susceptible to global change. However, their relative contributions to the formation and pool size of SOC and its fractions remain uncertain. In this study, we conducted a pot experiment followed by two incubation experiments, using natural 13C abundance isotope tracing to disentangle the effects of plant rhizodeposition, shoot litter, and root litter on SOC. The results showed that rhizodeposition during plant growth increased SOC stability by enhancing mineral-associated organic carbon and reducing particulate organic carbon, without affecting total SOC in the short term. Neither shoot litter nor root litter impacted SOC during short-term decomposition. Over the entire plant life cycle, the efficiency of plant carbon incorporation into SOC from root litter was 10 and 12 folds of that from shoot litter and rhizodeposition, respectively. Our findings indicate that, although root litter is less abundant than shoot litter, it plays a pivotal role in driving new SOC formation. This should be taken into account when predicting SOC sequestration, particularly given the turnover of roots under global change.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信