The effect of benchmarking on management practices and equid welfare on Prince Edward Island, Canada

M. Mills , K. Proudfoot , I. Elsohaby , J. Burns , M. Ross , S. McKenna , C. Ritter , K. MacMillan
{"title":"The effect of benchmarking on management practices and equid welfare on Prince Edward Island, Canada","authors":"M. Mills ,&nbsp;K. Proudfoot ,&nbsp;I. Elsohaby ,&nbsp;J. Burns ,&nbsp;M. Ross ,&nbsp;S. McKenna ,&nbsp;C. Ritter ,&nbsp;K. MacMillan","doi":"10.1016/j.anopes.2025.100093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There are challenges with assessing the welfare of equines due to their diverse uses and management practices. The objectives of this study were to (1) describe the prevalence of animal-based welfare outcomes and compliance with Canada’s National Farm Animal Care Council Code of Practice for the Care and Handling of Equines on equine farms in Prince Edward Island, Canada, and (2) determine the effect of benchmarking on compliance and awareness of the Code of Practice, as well as any changes in practices and animal-based welfare outcomes on these farms. Sixty farms were enrolled and were visited for an initial equine welfare assessment; all farms were then provided a benchmarking report that compared data collected from their equids to the other farms and the Code of Practice. Of these, 50 farms were re-visited the following year for a second assessment. The prevalence of animal-based outcomes in both years is presented descriptively, and differences between years were analyzed using paired t-tests and Chi-squared tests. On the second visit, 54% (n = 27) of farms showed more awareness of the Code of Practice and 48% (n = 24) of farms showed an improvement in at least one category of Code of Practice requirements. Of the animal-based measures, there was a significant reduction in the prevalence of unhealthy body condition score (−17.72, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), integument lesions (−6.22, <em>P</em> = 0.020), and hoof abnormalities (−4.541, <em>P</em> = 0.026) from the first to the second visit. Although it is not clear if these changes occurred solely due to the benchmarking report, the results suggest that horse and donkey owners may be motivated to improve equid care and management using this approach. This study adds to the existing knowledge of equid welfare by providing a practical framework for the development of animal welfare assessments and the potential role of benchmarking in improving the welfare of horses and donkeys on Prince Edward Island and abroad.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100083,"journal":{"name":"Animal - Open Space","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100093"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal - Open Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772694025000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are challenges with assessing the welfare of equines due to their diverse uses and management practices. The objectives of this study were to (1) describe the prevalence of animal-based welfare outcomes and compliance with Canada’s National Farm Animal Care Council Code of Practice for the Care and Handling of Equines on equine farms in Prince Edward Island, Canada, and (2) determine the effect of benchmarking on compliance and awareness of the Code of Practice, as well as any changes in practices and animal-based welfare outcomes on these farms. Sixty farms were enrolled and were visited for an initial equine welfare assessment; all farms were then provided a benchmarking report that compared data collected from their equids to the other farms and the Code of Practice. Of these, 50 farms were re-visited the following year for a second assessment. The prevalence of animal-based outcomes in both years is presented descriptively, and differences between years were analyzed using paired t-tests and Chi-squared tests. On the second visit, 54% (n = 27) of farms showed more awareness of the Code of Practice and 48% (n = 24) of farms showed an improvement in at least one category of Code of Practice requirements. Of the animal-based measures, there was a significant reduction in the prevalence of unhealthy body condition score (−17.72, P < 0.001), integument lesions (−6.22, P = 0.020), and hoof abnormalities (−4.541, P = 0.026) from the first to the second visit. Although it is not clear if these changes occurred solely due to the benchmarking report, the results suggest that horse and donkey owners may be motivated to improve equid care and management using this approach. This study adds to the existing knowledge of equid welfare by providing a practical framework for the development of animal welfare assessments and the potential role of benchmarking in improving the welfare of horses and donkeys on Prince Edward Island and abroad.
基准管理对加拿大爱德华王子岛管理实践和马科动物福利的影响
由于马的不同用途和管理实践,评估马的福利存在挑战。本研究的目的是:(1)描述动物福利结果的普遍程度,以及加拿大爱德华王子岛马场对加拿大国家农场动物护理委员会护理和处理马的实践守则的遵守情况;(2)确定基准测试对遵守和认识实践守则的影响,以及这些农场在实践和动物福利结果方面的任何变化。对60个农场进行了登记,并进行了初步的马福利评估;然后向所有农场提供一份基准报告,将从他们的马群收集的数据与其他农场和行为准则进行比较。其中,50个农场在第二年进行了第二次评估。描述性地呈现了两年中基于动物的结局的患病率,并使用配对t检验和卡方检验分析了年份之间的差异。在第二次访问中,54% (n = 27)的农场对《工作守则》的认识有所提高,48% (n = 24)的农场在至少一项《工作守则》要求方面有所改善。在以动物为基础的测量中,不健康身体状况评分的患病率显著降低(- 17.72,P <;从第一次到第二次就诊的患者中,被皮病变(- 6.22,P = 0.020)和蹄异常(- 4.541,P = 0.026)。虽然目前尚不清楚这些变化是否仅仅是由于基准报告,但结果表明,马和驴的主人可能有动力通过这种方法改善马的护理和管理。这项研究为动物福利评估的发展提供了一个实用的框架,并为改善爱德华王子岛和国外马和驴的福利提供了基准测试的潜在作用,从而增加了对马科动物福利的现有知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信