{"title":"Deep learning models as learners for EEG-based functional brain networks<sup />.","authors":"Yuxuan Yang, Yanli Li","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/adba8c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Functional brain network (FBN) methods are commonly integrated with deep learning (DL) models for EEG analysis. Typically, an FBN is constructed to extract features from EEG data, which are then fed into a DL model for further analysis. Beyond this two-step approach, there is potential to embed FBN construction directly within DL models as a feature extraction module, enabling the models to learn EEG representations end-to-end while incorporating insights from FBNs. However, a critical prerequisite is whether DL models can effectively learn the FBN construction process.<i>Approach.</i>To address this, we propose using DL models to learn FBN matrices derived from EEG data. The ability of DL models to accurately reproduce these matrices would validate their capacity to learn the FBN construction process. This approach is tested on two publicly available EEG datasets, utilizing seven DL models to learn four representative FBN matrices. Model performance is assessed through mean squared error (MSE), Pearson correlation coefficient (Corr), and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between predicted and actual matrices.<i>Main results.</i>The results show that DL models achieve low MSE and relatively high Corr and CCC values when learning the Coherence network. Visualizations of predicted and error matrices reveal that while DL models capture the general structure of all four FBNs, certain regions remain difficult to model accurately. Additionally, a paired<i>t</i>-test comparing global efficiency and nodal degree between predicted and actual networks indicates that most predicted networks significantly differ from the actual networks (p<0.05).<i>Significance.</i>These findings suggest that while DL models can learn the connectivity relationships of certain FBNs, they struggle to capture the intrinsic topological structures. This highlights the irreplaceability of traditional FBN methods in EEG analysis and underscores the need for hybrid strategies that combine FBN methods with DL models for a more comprehensive analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/adba8c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective.Functional brain network (FBN) methods are commonly integrated with deep learning (DL) models for EEG analysis. Typically, an FBN is constructed to extract features from EEG data, which are then fed into a DL model for further analysis. Beyond this two-step approach, there is potential to embed FBN construction directly within DL models as a feature extraction module, enabling the models to learn EEG representations end-to-end while incorporating insights from FBNs. However, a critical prerequisite is whether DL models can effectively learn the FBN construction process.Approach.To address this, we propose using DL models to learn FBN matrices derived from EEG data. The ability of DL models to accurately reproduce these matrices would validate their capacity to learn the FBN construction process. This approach is tested on two publicly available EEG datasets, utilizing seven DL models to learn four representative FBN matrices. Model performance is assessed through mean squared error (MSE), Pearson correlation coefficient (Corr), and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between predicted and actual matrices.Main results.The results show that DL models achieve low MSE and relatively high Corr and CCC values when learning the Coherence network. Visualizations of predicted and error matrices reveal that while DL models capture the general structure of all four FBNs, certain regions remain difficult to model accurately. Additionally, a pairedt-test comparing global efficiency and nodal degree between predicted and actual networks indicates that most predicted networks significantly differ from the actual networks (p<0.05).Significance.These findings suggest that while DL models can learn the connectivity relationships of certain FBNs, they struggle to capture the intrinsic topological structures. This highlights the irreplaceability of traditional FBN methods in EEG analysis and underscores the need for hybrid strategies that combine FBN methods with DL models for a more comprehensive analysis.