Liquid Biopsy for Enhanced Specificity in Identifying Somatic Mutations in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Comparative Study of Cell-Free DNA and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue
Gayaththri Vimalathas, Oriane Cédile, Marie Louise Grube Kjeldsen, Mads Thomassen, Michael Boe Møller, Charlotte Guldborg Nyvold, Marcus Høy Hansen, Thomas Stauffer Larsen
{"title":"Liquid Biopsy for Enhanced Specificity in Identifying Somatic Mutations in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Comparative Study of Cell-Free DNA and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue","authors":"Gayaththri Vimalathas, Oriane Cédile, Marie Louise Grube Kjeldsen, Mads Thomassen, Michael Boe Møller, Charlotte Guldborg Nyvold, Marcus Høy Hansen, Thomas Stauffer Larsen","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor biopsy is the current mainstay of genotyping, but is limited by its invasiveness and tumor heterogeneity. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) constitutes a minimally invasive alternative that may better capture tumor-derived profiles from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). This study compares the performance and genomic concordance of cfDNA and FFPE tumor DNA in aggressive non-Hodgkin large B-cell lymphoma.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Paired diagnostic FFPE tissue and plasma samples from 15 patients were sequenced with a custom 53-gene panel.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Detection thresholds were empirically guided at 1% variant allele frequency (VAF) for cfDNA and 10% for unpaired FFPE DNA. The median number of cfDNA variants was 6 (interquartile range (IQR): 2–11) versus 63 (IQR: 15–250) in FFPE DNA at 1% VAF. Collectively, 102 somatic variants were shared between cfDNA and FFPE DNA with a median of 5 (range: 0–23). cfDNA showed a five-fold lower median VAF for shared variants than FFPE DNA (7% vs. 36%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Eighty percent of patients harbored at least one cfDNA variant. A maximum cfDNA recall rate of 83% was observed at FFPE DNA VAF > 50%. COSMIC database overlap was twice as high for cfDNA compared to FFPE DNA (22% vs. 11%) at 10% VAF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>cfDNA has superior specificity for somatic mutation detection but lower sensitivity than FFPE DNA. Modest concordance was demonstrated between the two compartments. Our results support a complementary role of ctDNA in mutational profiling at a 1% VAF threshold in a pragmatic and clinically applicable setup.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14120,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","volume":"47 4","pages":"669-679"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijlh.14454","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor biopsy is the current mainstay of genotyping, but is limited by its invasiveness and tumor heterogeneity. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) constitutes a minimally invasive alternative that may better capture tumor-derived profiles from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). This study compares the performance and genomic concordance of cfDNA and FFPE tumor DNA in aggressive non-Hodgkin large B-cell lymphoma.
Methods
Paired diagnostic FFPE tissue and plasma samples from 15 patients were sequenced with a custom 53-gene panel.
Results
Detection thresholds were empirically guided at 1% variant allele frequency (VAF) for cfDNA and 10% for unpaired FFPE DNA. The median number of cfDNA variants was 6 (interquartile range (IQR): 2–11) versus 63 (IQR: 15–250) in FFPE DNA at 1% VAF. Collectively, 102 somatic variants were shared between cfDNA and FFPE DNA with a median of 5 (range: 0–23). cfDNA showed a five-fold lower median VAF for shared variants than FFPE DNA (7% vs. 36%, p < 0.0001). Eighty percent of patients harbored at least one cfDNA variant. A maximum cfDNA recall rate of 83% was observed at FFPE DNA VAF > 50%. COSMIC database overlap was twice as high for cfDNA compared to FFPE DNA (22% vs. 11%) at 10% VAF.
Conclusion
cfDNA has superior specificity for somatic mutation detection but lower sensitivity than FFPE DNA. Modest concordance was demonstrated between the two compartments. Our results support a complementary role of ctDNA in mutational profiling at a 1% VAF threshold in a pragmatic and clinically applicable setup.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology provides a forum for the communication of new developments, research topics and the practice of laboratory haematology.
The journal publishes invited reviews, full length original articles, and correspondence.
The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology is the official journal of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, which addresses the following sub-disciplines: cellular analysis, flow cytometry, haemostasis and thrombosis, molecular diagnostics, haematology informatics, haemoglobinopathies, point of care testing, standards and guidelines.
The journal was launched in 2006 as the successor to Clinical and Laboratory Hematology, which was first published in 1979. An active and positive editorial policy ensures that work of a high scientific standard is reported, in order to bridge the gap between practical and academic aspects of laboratory haematology.