Bladder Wash as an Alternative Postmortem Toxicology Specimen: Forensic Pathologists' Perspectives.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Luke N Rodda, Kylie E Candela, Amy P Hart, Ellen G Moffatt, Sue Pearring, Karen S Scott
{"title":"Bladder Wash as an Alternative Postmortem Toxicology Specimen: Forensic Pathologists' Perspectives.","authors":"Luke N Rodda, Kylie E Candela, Amy P Hart, Ellen G Moffatt, Sue Pearring, Karen S Scott","doi":"10.1097/PAF.0000000000001034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In postmortem forensic investigations, where the bladder is voided or dehydrated prior to autopsy, it is possible to wash the bladder with saline to collect the resulting \"bladder wash\" and any residual urine for toxicological analysis. Although this method is not yet commonplace or standard, a recent study has demonstrated that bladder wash is an effective alternative specimen in postmortem forensic toxicology. The current study aimed to assess forensic pathologists' opinions on the use of bladder wash samples both before and after reviewing bladder wash toxicological data. An online survey was distributed to forensic pathologists from NAME, and responses were analyzed to identify any shifts in perceptions after data presentation. The findings revealed that most forensic pathologists recognized the benefits of bladder wash collection and analysis as well as its usefulness in determining the cause and manner of death, with noticeable changes in perspective following exposure to supporting data. This study highlights the potential value of standardizing the easy and accessible collection of bladder wash for postmortem toxicological analysis, thereby providing forensic pathologists with invaluable information when other biological specimens are unavailable.</p>","PeriodicalId":55535,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000001034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: In postmortem forensic investigations, where the bladder is voided or dehydrated prior to autopsy, it is possible to wash the bladder with saline to collect the resulting "bladder wash" and any residual urine for toxicological analysis. Although this method is not yet commonplace or standard, a recent study has demonstrated that bladder wash is an effective alternative specimen in postmortem forensic toxicology. The current study aimed to assess forensic pathologists' opinions on the use of bladder wash samples both before and after reviewing bladder wash toxicological data. An online survey was distributed to forensic pathologists from NAME, and responses were analyzed to identify any shifts in perceptions after data presentation. The findings revealed that most forensic pathologists recognized the benefits of bladder wash collection and analysis as well as its usefulness in determining the cause and manner of death, with noticeable changes in perspective following exposure to supporting data. This study highlights the potential value of standardizing the easy and accessible collection of bladder wash for postmortem toxicological analysis, thereby providing forensic pathologists with invaluable information when other biological specimens are unavailable.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drawing on the expertise of leading forensic pathologists, lawyers, and criminologists, The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology presents up-to-date coverage of forensic medical practices worldwide. Each issue of the journal features original articles on new examination and documentation procedures. While most articles are available as web based articles, PDF and in ePub reader format, some earlier articles do not have PDFs available. If you would like to view an article in the ePub format, you will need to download an ePub reader to view this file, a number of which are available for free online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信