The interaction of study sequence presentation mode and response assignment reveals the effects of multiple computational systems on an immediate visual recognition task

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Arnold L. Glass, Tingtao Wang, Allyson Fu
{"title":"The interaction of study sequence presentation mode and response assignment reveals the effects of multiple computational systems on an immediate visual recognition task","authors":"Arnold L. Glass,&nbsp;Tingtao Wang,&nbsp;Allyson Fu","doi":"10.3758/s13414-025-03032-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Participants responded whether a single digit was in the immediately preceding digit sequence by pressing one of two keys as rapidly as possible while trying to avoid errors. Each participant performed four different kinds of sessions: Either all of the digits of the study sequence were presented in the same position or the digits were presented in successive positions from left to right. Either the <i>same</i> response was assigned to the right key and the <i>different</i> response to the left key or vice versa. Response time (RT) was an increasing function of the length of the study sequence. RT was an increasing function of the target’s position in the study sequence when the <i>different</i> response was assigned to the right key. When the <i>same</i> response was assigned to the right key, RT was a decreasing function of the target’s position in the study sequence when the study sequence had been presented in one location but there was no effect of target position on RT when the study sequence had been presented from left to right. The effects of study sequence length and target position were independent in the three conditions in which there was an effect of target position. Also, RT decreased for targets that had previously appeared as test items but RT increased for lures that had previously appeared as test items. The results confirm a dual-system hypothesis of recognition involving both the perceived recency of the target and the retrieval of the previous context of the target.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":"87 3","pages":"952 - 967"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13414-025-03032-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-025-03032-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participants responded whether a single digit was in the immediately preceding digit sequence by pressing one of two keys as rapidly as possible while trying to avoid errors. Each participant performed four different kinds of sessions: Either all of the digits of the study sequence were presented in the same position or the digits were presented in successive positions from left to right. Either the same response was assigned to the right key and the different response to the left key or vice versa. Response time (RT) was an increasing function of the length of the study sequence. RT was an increasing function of the target’s position in the study sequence when the different response was assigned to the right key. When the same response was assigned to the right key, RT was a decreasing function of the target’s position in the study sequence when the study sequence had been presented in one location but there was no effect of target position on RT when the study sequence had been presented from left to right. The effects of study sequence length and target position were independent in the three conditions in which there was an effect of target position. Also, RT decreased for targets that had previously appeared as test items but RT increased for lures that had previously appeared as test items. The results confirm a dual-system hypothesis of recognition involving both the perceived recency of the target and the retrieval of the previous context of the target.

研究序列呈现模式和响应分配的交互作用揭示了多个计算系统对即时视觉识别任务的影响。
参与者通过尽可能快地按两个键中的一个来回答前一个数字是否在前一个数字序列中,同时尽量避免错误。每个参与者都进行了四种不同的会话:要么将研究序列中的所有数字以相同的位置呈现,要么将数字从左到右依次呈现。或者给右键分配相同的响应,给左键分配不同的响应,或者反之亦然。反应时间(RT)是研究序列长度的递增函数。当不同的反应被分配到正确的键时,RT是目标在研究序列中位置的递增函数。当相同的反应分配给右键时,当研究序列在一个位置呈现时,目标在研究序列中位置的RT是一个递减函数,而当研究序列从左到右呈现时,目标位置对RT没有影响。在有目标位置影响的三种情况下,研究序列长度和目标位置的影响是独立的。此外,对于先前作为测试项目出现的目标,RT减少,但对于先前作为测试项目出现的诱饵,RT增加。结果证实了识别的双重系统假设,包括对目标的感知近代性和对目标先前上下文的检索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信