Inclusivity in Nursing Education: Mixed Methods Inquiry Into Knowledge and Attitudes of Faculty About Neurodiverse Students.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nurse Educator Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001838
Megan Arbour, Kathryn Hansen, Maria Milazzo, Jane Houston, Kelly Walker
{"title":"Inclusivity in Nursing Education: Mixed Methods Inquiry Into Knowledge and Attitudes of Faculty About Neurodiverse Students.","authors":"Megan Arbour, Kathryn Hansen, Maria Milazzo, Jane Houston, Kelly Walker","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neurodiverse and disabled individuals are underrepresented in nursing education, often facing marginalization, lack of support, and implicit bias.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assessed nursing faculty's preparedness to teach neurodiverse students by examining their knowledge and attitudes about neurodiversity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convergent parallel mixed methods design was used, involving a survey emailed to 469 nursing faculty at 3 North American institutions. The survey included the Faculty Preparedness Questionnaire-Neurodiversity and open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that faculty has moderate knowledge of neurodiversity but desire more training. Attitudes were generally positive, though some implicit biases were present. Qualitative analysis revealed themes of natural variation, acceptance, and the need for more support and training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Faculty members showed a willingness to learn and support neurodiverse students, but professional development is needed to reduce ableism and enhance inclusive teaching practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":" ","pages":"183-188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001838","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neurodiverse and disabled individuals are underrepresented in nursing education, often facing marginalization, lack of support, and implicit bias.

Purpose: This study assessed nursing faculty's preparedness to teach neurodiverse students by examining their knowledge and attitudes about neurodiversity.

Methods: A convergent parallel mixed methods design was used, involving a survey emailed to 469 nursing faculty at 3 North American institutions. The survey included the Faculty Preparedness Questionnaire-Neurodiversity and open-ended questions.

Results: The study found that faculty has moderate knowledge of neurodiversity but desire more training. Attitudes were generally positive, though some implicit biases were present. Qualitative analysis revealed themes of natural variation, acceptance, and the need for more support and training.

Conclusion: Faculty members showed a willingness to learn and support neurodiverse students, but professional development is needed to reduce ableism and enhance inclusive teaching practices.

护理教育的包容性:教师对神经多样性学生的知识和态度的混合方法调查。
背景:神经多样性和残疾个体在护理教育中的代表性不足,经常面临边缘化,缺乏支持和隐性偏见。目的:本研究通过考察护理教师对神经多样性的知识和态度,评估护理教师对神经多样性学生的教学准备情况。方法:采用趋同平行混合方法设计,通过电子邮件对北美3家机构的469名护理教员进行调查。调查包括教师准备问卷-神经多样性和开放式问题。结果:研究发现,教师对神经多样性知识的了解程度一般,但需要更多的培训。态度总体上是积极的,尽管存在一些内隐偏见。定性分析揭示了自然变化、接受程度以及需要更多支持和培训的主题。结论:教师表现出学习和支持神经多样性学生的意愿,但需要专业发展来减少残疾歧视和加强包容性教学实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nurse Educator
Nurse Educator 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信