Elevated C-reactive protein and cardiovascular risk.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jia Ee Chia, Song Peng Ang
{"title":"Elevated C-reactive protein and cardiovascular risk.","authors":"Jia Ee Chia, Song Peng Ang","doi":"10.1097/HCO.0000000000001215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review critically examines the evolving role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in cardiovascular disease (CVD), addressing its pathogenesis and relationship with various CVDs including coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure, and atrial fibrillation.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>CRP is mechanistically implicated in endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and plaque destabilization. Recent studies demonstrate that lipid-lowering agents (statins, bempedoic acid) and anti-inflammatory therapies (canakinumab, colchicine) reduce CRP levels and improve outcomes in CAD. In heart failure, elevated CRP predicts adverse events, though evidence on phenotypes varies, and novel therapies (glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) lower CRP independently of weight loss. For atrial fibrillation, CRP correlates with postoperative incidence and recurrence postablation, though data remain inconsistent. Guidelines offer differing opinion with the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines cautiously endorsing CRP for risk stratification in intermediate-risk individuals, while European guidelines advise against its routine use for primary prevention, reflecting unresolved questions about CRP's additive value.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>CRP remains a pivotal inflammation biomarker in CVD, yet its causal role and clinical applicability require clarification. While CRP-guided therapies show promise, discrepancies in guidelines highlight the need for robust trials to determine whether targeting CRP directly improves outcomes. Future research should focus on CRP's pathophysiological mechanisms and validate its utility in personalized CVD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":55197,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review critically examines the evolving role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in cardiovascular disease (CVD), addressing its pathogenesis and relationship with various CVDs including coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure, and atrial fibrillation.

Recent findings: CRP is mechanistically implicated in endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and plaque destabilization. Recent studies demonstrate that lipid-lowering agents (statins, bempedoic acid) and anti-inflammatory therapies (canakinumab, colchicine) reduce CRP levels and improve outcomes in CAD. In heart failure, elevated CRP predicts adverse events, though evidence on phenotypes varies, and novel therapies (glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) lower CRP independently of weight loss. For atrial fibrillation, CRP correlates with postoperative incidence and recurrence postablation, though data remain inconsistent. Guidelines offer differing opinion with the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines cautiously endorsing CRP for risk stratification in intermediate-risk individuals, while European guidelines advise against its routine use for primary prevention, reflecting unresolved questions about CRP's additive value.

Summary: CRP remains a pivotal inflammation biomarker in CVD, yet its causal role and clinical applicability require clarification. While CRP-guided therapies show promise, discrepancies in guidelines highlight the need for robust trials to determine whether targeting CRP directly improves outcomes. Future research should focus on CRP's pathophysiological mechanisms and validate its utility in personalized CVD management.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Cardiology
Current Opinion in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Cardiology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fourteen disciplines published across the year – including arrhythmias, molecular genetics, HDL cholesterol and clinical trials – every issue also contains annotated reference detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信