Integrating information from off-board sensors into the submarine control room: workload, situation awareness, and performance consequences.

IF 2 3区工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL

Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1080/00140139.2025.2470251

Shayne Loft, Zachary L Howard, Stephen Pond, Jessica Irons, Steph Michailovs, Derek Swe, Jason Bell, Troy A W Visser, Gavin Pinniger, Megan Schmitt

{"title":"Integrating information from off-board sensors into the submarine control room: workload, situation awareness, and performance consequences.","authors":"Shayne Loft, Zachary L Howard, Stephen Pond, Jessica Irons, Steph Michailovs, Derek Swe, Jason Bell, Troy A W Visser, Gavin Pinniger, Megan Schmitt","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2470251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Off-board sensors have the potential to provide submarine control rooms with otherwise inaccessible information to supplement data gathered by on-board sensors. Using Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as a representative test case, we examined how team performance, workload and situation awareness were impacted by receiving raw, compared to processed, sensor data from one or two off-board UAVs. Sixteen teams of three participants were trained to compile a tactical picture and to complete missions. Teams receiving processed off-board sensor data compiled more accurate tactical pictures, completed missions faster, and reported lower workload, compared to teams receiving raw off-board sensor data. Situation awareness, objective workload, and perceived usability were comparable between conditions. Scenarios with two UAVs took longer to complete, with other outcomes unaffected. These outcomes provide evidence that humans can integrate additional and distinct sources of information to form a cohesive combined picture, even when those data are partially redundant.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2470251","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Off-board sensors have the potential to provide submarine control rooms with otherwise inaccessible information to supplement data gathered by on-board sensors. Using Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as a representative test case, we examined how team performance, workload and situation awareness were impacted by receiving raw, compared to processed, sensor data from one or two off-board UAVs. Sixteen teams of three participants were trained to compile a tactical picture and to complete missions. Teams receiving processed off-board sensor data compiled more accurate tactical pictures, completed missions faster, and reported lower workload, compared to teams receiving raw off-board sensor data. Situation awareness, objective workload, and perceived usability were comparable between conditions. Scenarios with two UAVs took longer to complete, with other outcomes unaffected. These outcomes provide evidence that humans can integrate additional and distinct sources of information to form a cohesive combined picture, even when those data are partially redundant.

查看原文本刊更多论文

将来自船外传感器的信息集成到潜艇控制室：工作量、态势感知和性能后果。

船外传感器有可能向潜艇控制室提供其他无法获取的信息，以补充船上传感器收集的数据。使用无人驾驶飞行器（uav）作为代表性测试案例，我们检查了接收来自一到两架机载无人机的原始传感器数据与处理后的传感器数据相比，团队绩效、工作量和态势感知是如何受到影响的。由三人组成的16个小组接受了编制战术图和完成任务的训练。与接收原始机载传感器数据的团队相比，接收处理过的机载传感器数据的团队编制了更准确的战术图片，更快地完成了任务，并且报告了更低的工作量。情境感知、客观工作量和感知可用性在不同条件下具有可比性。两架无人机的场景需要更长的时间来完成，其他结果不受影响。这些结果提供了证据，证明人类可以整合额外的和不同的信息来源，形成一个有凝聚力的组合图像，即使这些数据部分是冗余的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Ergonomics 工程技术-工程：工业

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

12.50%

发文量

147

审稿时长

6 months

期刊介绍： Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.