Minimally invasive surgical techniques compared to an extensile lateral approach in the management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Scott D Purdie, Niamh Hoskins, Regina Jesslyn Sumarlie, Natthaya Eiamampai, Paul Lebeslé, Fergus Wood, Anagha Chinmayee, Wei Qi Lim, Sriskandarasa Senthilkumaran, Louise Fisher, Santosh Baliga
{"title":"Minimally invasive surgical techniques compared to an extensile lateral approach in the management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Scott D Purdie, Niamh Hoskins, Regina Jesslyn Sumarlie, Natthaya Eiamampai, Paul Lebeslé, Fergus Wood, Anagha Chinmayee, Wei Qi Lim, Sriskandarasa Senthilkumaran, Louise Fisher, Santosh Baliga","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Developments in minimally invasive surgical techniques (MIS) have sparked debate over the optimal intervention for calcaneal fractures. This meta-analysis compares the extensile lateral approach (ELA) to two MIS techniques; the sinus tarsi approach and percutaneous approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across seven databases for randomised control trials (RCTs). The clinical outcomes were wound complications, functional scores (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score, and Maryland Foot Score) and radiological measures (Böhler's and Gissane's angles).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen RCTs (n = 1367; mean age: 36.3 years; 25.7 % female) were included. MIS significantly reduced wound complications compared to ELA (RR 6.48, 95 %CI 4.03-10.41, p < 0.00001, n = 1380, GRADE: High). Functional scores favoured MIS, and radiological outcomes were equivalent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both MIS techniques reduce wound complications, improve functional outcomes, and achieve comparable anatomical reduction, making them suitable alternatives to the extensile lateral approach, to significantly improve patient's outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2025.02.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Developments in minimally invasive surgical techniques (MIS) have sparked debate over the optimal intervention for calcaneal fractures. This meta-analysis compares the extensile lateral approach (ELA) to two MIS techniques; the sinus tarsi approach and percutaneous approaches.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across seven databases for randomised control trials (RCTs). The clinical outcomes were wound complications, functional scores (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score, and Maryland Foot Score) and radiological measures (Böhler's and Gissane's angles).

Results: Fourteen RCTs (n = 1367; mean age: 36.3 years; 25.7 % female) were included. MIS significantly reduced wound complications compared to ELA (RR 6.48, 95 %CI 4.03-10.41, p < 0.00001, n = 1380, GRADE: High). Functional scores favoured MIS, and radiological outcomes were equivalent.

Conclusions: Both MIS techniques reduce wound complications, improve functional outcomes, and achieve comparable anatomical reduction, making them suitable alternatives to the extensile lateral approach, to significantly improve patient's outcomes.

Level of evidence: Level 1.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信